The social, psychological, physical, and financial benefits of digital inclusion are of increasing importance for older persons. However, older persons are often less inclined to utilise technological communication with reports of perceived poor technology acceptance. In this context, a study was conducted to investigate communication technology acceptance in older persons living in residential care. A cross sectional survey of residents (≥60 yrs) of four inner city residences in Durban, South Africa was conducted to assess communication technology access and technology acceptance defined as Usage Behaviour. A researcher-administered questionnaire was based on the Senior Technology Acceptance Model (STAM). Descriptive statistics of STAM factors and structural equation model (SEM) were conducted to test this model, to quantify the importance of various technology acceptance factors on Usage Behaviour among older persons living in residential care. The survey had a 72.1% response rate (n=277). Most of the respondents owned mobile phones (87.6%), although there was low smartphone ownership. Family desire to communicate and ease of use motivated mobile phone acquisition. Behaviour Intention, Facilitating Conditions, Attitude to Life and Satisfaction and education level were significantly associated with Usage Behaviour. Gerontechnology Anxiety and Age showed significant negative associations with Usage Behaviour. The acceptance of communication technology in this setting was low and predominantly influenced by Attitudinal and Technological Context factors together with age and education.
AjzenI (2011) The theory of planned behaviour: Reactions and reflections. Psychology & Health26(9): 1113–1127. DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2011.613995.
2.
Al-ShorbajiN (2013) The world health assembly resolutions on eHealth: eHealth in support of universal health coverage. Methods of Information in Medicine. Available at: http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/24310395.
3.
AndreassonK (2015) Digital Divides: The New Challenges and Opportunities of e-Inclusion. New York: CRC Press.
4.
BallCFrancisJHuangK-T, et al. (2017) The physical–digital divide: exploring the social gap between digital natives and physical natives. Journal of Applied Gerontology. SAGE Publications Inc: 073346481773251. DOI: 10.1177/0733464817732518.
5.
BarnardYBradleyMDHodgsonF, et al. (2013) Learning to use new technologies by older adults: Perceived difficulties, experimentation behaviour and usability. Computers in Human Behavior29(4): 1715–1724. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.006.
6.
BroadyTChanACaputiP (2010) Comparison of older and younger adults’ attitudes towards and abilities with computers: Implications for training and learning. British Journal of Educational Technology41(3): 473–485. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00914.x.
7.
BrownSAVenkateshVGoyalS (2012) Expectation confirmation in technology use. Information Systems Research23(2): 474–487. DOI: 10.1287/isre.1110.0357.
ChenKChanAHS (2011) A review of technology acceptance by older adults. Gerontechnology10(1): 1–12. DOI: 10.4017/gt.2011.10.01.006.00.
10.
ChenKChanAHS (2014) Gerontechnology acceptance by elderly Hong Kong Chinese: a senior technology acceptance model (STAM). Ergonomics57(5): 635–652. DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2014.895855.
11.
ChippsJJarvisMA (2017) Technology-assisted communication in older persons in a residential care facility in South Africa. Information Development33(4): 393–405. DOI: 10.1177/0266666916664388.
12.
DavisFDBagozziRPWarshawPR (1989) User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science35(8): 982–1003. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982.
13.
de VeerAJEPeetersJMBrabersAE, et al. (2015) Determinants of the intention to use e-Health by community dwelling older people. BMC Health Services Research15(1): 103. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-015-0765-8.
14.
DelelloJAMcWhorterRR (2017) Reducing the digital divide: connecting older adults to iPad technology. Journal of Applied Gerontology36(1): 3–28. DOI: 10.1177/0733464815589985.
15.
GaoQEbertDChenX, et al. (2015) Design of a mobile social community platform for older Chinese people in Urban Areas. Human Factors and Ergonomics In Manufacturing 25(1): 66–89. DOI: 10.1002/hfm.20523.
16.
HardillIOlphertCW (2012) Staying connected: Exploring mobile phone use amongst older adults in the UK. Geoforum43(6): 1306–1312. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.03.016.
KuerbisAMullikenAMuenchF, et al. (2017) Older adults and mobile technology: Factors that enhance and inhibit utilization in the context of behavioral health. Mental Health and Addiction Research2(2): 1–11. DOI: 10.15761/MHAR.1000136.
LawtonMPBrodyEM (1969) Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. The Gerontologist9(3 Part 1): 179–186. DOI: 10.1093/geront/9.3_Part_1.179.
21.
LeeCCoughlinJF (2015) PERSPECTIVE: Older adults’ adoption of technology: an integrated approach to identifying determinants and barriers. Journal of Product Innovation Management32(5): 747–759. DOI: 10.1111/jpim.12176.
22.
LeungRTangCHaddadS, et al. (2012) How older adults learn to use mobile devices: survey and field investigatons. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing4(3): 1–33. DOI: 10.1145/2399193.2399195.
23.
LiuNYuR (2017) Identifying design feature factors critical to acceptance and usage behavior of smartphones. Computers in Human Behavior70: 131–142. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.073.
24.
MaQChanAHSChenK (2016) Personal and other factors affecting acceptance of smartphone technology by older Chinese adults. Applied Ergonomics54: 62–71. DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2015.11.015.
25.
MarangunićNGranićA (2015) Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013. Universal Access in the Information Society14(1): 81–95. DOI: 10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1.
26.
MasiCMChenH-YHawkleyLC, et al. (2011) A meta-analysis of interventions to reduce loneliness. Personality and Social Psychology Review15(3): 219–266. DOI: 10.1177/1088868310377394.
27.
McDowellI (2006) Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
28.
MimiMYTChanKLAnthonySWW, et al. (2017) The use of smart phones and their mobile applications among older adults in Hong Kong: An exploratory study. GSTF Journal of Nursing and Health Care (JNHC) 1(2). Available at: http://dl6.globalstf.org/index.php/jnhc/article/view/327.
29.
Officer A, SchneidersMLWuD, et al. (2016) Valuing older people: time for a global campaign to combat ageism. Bulletin of the World Health Organization94(10): 710–710A. DOI: 10.2471/BLT.16.184960.
30.
OlphertWDamodaranL (2013) Older people and digital disengagement: a fourth digital divide?Gerontology59(6): 564–570. DOI: 10.1159/000353630.
PillayURobertsBRuleS (2006) South African Social Attitudes: Changing Times, Diverse Voices. South African Social Attitudes Changing Times, Diverse Voices. Cape Town: HSRC Press. Available at:http://repository.hsrc.ac.za/handle/20.500.11910/6859.
33.
RenaudKvan BiljonJ (2008) Predicting technology acceptance and adoption by the elderly. In: Proceedings of the 2008 annual research conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists on IT research in developing countries riding the wave of technology - SAICSIT ’08, New York, New York, USA, 2008, pp. 210–219. ACM Press. DOI: 10.1145/1456659.1456684.
34.
SaccolAZReinhardN (2006) The hospitality metaphor as a theoretical lens for understanding the ICT adoption process. Journal of Information Technology21(3): 154–164. DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000067.
35.
ShinD-H (2017) Conceptualizing and measuring quality of experience of the internet of things: Exploring how quality is perceived by users. Information & Management54(8): 998–1011. DOI: 10.1016/j.im.2017.02.006.
36.
ShinD-HLeeSHwangY (2017) How do credibility and utility play in the user experience of health informatics services?Computers in Human Behavior67: 292–302. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.007.
37.
ShklovskiIKrautRCummingsJ (2008) Keeping in touch by technology. In: Proceeding of the Twenty-Sixth Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’08, New York, April 2008, pp. 807–816. ACM Press. DOI: 10.1145/1357054.1357182.
38.
SlegersKvan BoxtelMPJJollesJ (2008) Effects of computer training and internet usage on the well-being and quality of life of older adults: a randomized, controlled study. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences63(3): P176–P184. DOI: 10.1093/geronb/63.3.P176.
39.
ThorsonJADavisRE (2000) Relocation of the institutionalized aged. Journal of Clinical Psychology56(1): 131–138. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4679(200001)56:1<131:: AID-JCLP12>3.0.CO;2-S.
40.
van BiljonJRenaudK (2008) A Qualitative Study of the applicability of technology acceptance models to senior mobile phone users. In: International Conference on Conceptual Modeling, Barcelona, Spain, 2008, pp. 228–237. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-87991-6_28.
41.
van DykTRenaudKvan BiljonJ (2012) Moses – Method for selecting senior mobile phones: supporting design & choice for the elderly. In: Proceedings of the South African Institute for Computer Scientists and Information Technologists Conference on - SAICSIT ’12, New York, New York, USA, October 2012, pp. 277–285. SAICSIT ’12. ACM Press. DOI: 10.1145/2389836.2389869.
42.
World Bank (2016) World Development Report 2016: Digital Dividends. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank. DOI: 10.1596/978-1-4648-0671-1.
ZhouJRauPLPSalvendyG (2014) Older adults’ use of smart phones: An investigation of the factors influencing the acceptance of new functions. Behaviour and Information Technology33(6): 552–560. DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2013.780637.
47.
ZillienNHargittaiE (2009) Digital distinction: status-specific types of internet usage. Social Science Quarterly90(2): 274–291. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2009.00617.x.
