This research study aimed to investigate the lack of student engagement in Chinese library science (LS) undergraduate education. Specifically, this study aimed to identify and understand the causes of the lack of student engagement and to articulate effective and pragmatic resolving strategies. This study adopted an inductive approach and a single case study design. The LS program at Wuhan University was employed as the case study, in which 29 full-time students were interviewed using a semi-structured question script. A thematic analysis of the interview transcripts pointed to 11 causes of the lack of student engagement. The conceptualisation of the research findings suggested revising the existing LS curricula and maintaining dynamic and interactive relationships among three main determinants of student engagement: curricular design, students’ individual interests, and career prospects. This study provides a perspective on the development and survival of LS education in China and shares important lessons and experiences for LS educators and policy makers across international borders.
AstinAW (1984) Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel25(4): 297–308.
2.
BenbasatIGoldsteinDMeadM (1987) The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems. MIS Quarterly11(3): 369–386.
3.
ChenCWuGShengZ. (2009) The development and prospects of library and information science education in Chinese mainland from 1949 to 2009. Library Journal63: 452–462.
4.
DerakhshanMHassanzadehMNazariM (2015) Developing Information Literate Librarians: A Study of LIS Academics Pedagogical Approaches in the Development of Information Literacy Competencies. The Journal of Academic Librarianship41(6): 777–785.
5.
EisenhardtKM (1989) Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review14(4): 532–550.
6.
FanF (2006) Collaboration and resource sharing among LIS schools in China. InProceedings of the Asia-Pacific Conference on Library & Information Education & Practice 2006 (A-LIEP 2006): 284–287.
7.
GuN (2010) On the professional identity and library science education. Library Tribune30(1), 161–163.
8.
HidiSRenningerKA (2006) The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist41(2): 111–127.
9.
HofstedeGHofstedeGJ (2005) Culture and Organizations: Software of the Mind. New York: McGraw-Hill USA.
10.
JinTBouthillierF (2012) The integration of intelligence analysis into LIS education. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science53(2): 130–148.
11.
JonesBD (2009) Motivating students to engage in learning: the MUSIC model of academic motivation. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education21(2): 272–285.
12.
JonesBDLlacer-ArrastiaSNewbillPB (2009) Motivating foreign language students using self-determination theory. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching3(2): 171–189.
13.
JuznicPUrbanijaJ (2003) Developing research skills in library and information science studies. Library Management24(6/7): 324–331.
14.
KingNHorrocksC (2010) Interviews in Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
15.
KuhGD (2009) What student affairs professionals need to know about student engagement. Journal of College Student Development50(6): 683–706.
16.
KuhGDGonyeaRM (2015) The role of the academic library in promoting student engagement in learning. College & Research Libraries76(3): 359–385.
17.
Levett-JonesTLathleanJHigginsI. (2009) Staff-student relationships and their impact on nursing students’ belongingess and learning. Journal of Advanced Nursing65: 316–324.
18.
LiuZ (2001) Social psychological factors with graduates specializing in library science unwilling to take up library service. Library Journal20(11): 45–48.
19.
MalekabadizadehFShokranehFHosseiniA (2009) The role of library and information science education in national development. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal): 259.
20.
ParsonsJTaylorL (2011) Improving student engagement. Current Issues in Education14(1): 88.
21.
PascarellaETerenziniP (1991) How College Affects Students: Findings and insights from twenty years of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
22.
PikeGRKuhGD (2005) A typology of student engagement for American colleges and universities. Research in Higher Education46(2): 185–209.
23.
QuanLWangWShuM (2010) Thoughts on the library science education and employment in china. Library and Information Service54(17): 49–120.
SaundersMLewisPThornhillA (2002) Research Methods for Business Students. New York: Prentice Hall.
26.
SimonsJVansteenkisteMLensW. (2004) Placing motivation and future time perspective theory in a temporal perspective. Educational Psychology Review16(2): 121–139.
27.
SmithKASheppardSDJohnsonDW. (2005) Pedagogies of engagement: Classroom-based practices. Journal of Engineering Education94(1): 87–101.
28.
StraussACorbinJ (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage Publications, Inc.
29.
WalkerKWPearceM (2014) Student engagement in one-shot library instruction. The Journal of Academic Librarianship40(3): 281–290.
30.
WangPXuJSongZ (2013) Crisis warning towards occupation deviation of library science students: based on stereotype of the future professionals toward the librarians. Library and Information Service57(21): 59–64.
31.
WuYChuJ (1997) Thoughts on strengthening professional ideological education in library science students. Journal of Library Science (1): 12–13.
32.
XiaoX (2004) The ultimate way out of the library science education lies in the reform of educational system. Journal of Academic Libraries22(1): 47–49.
33.
XiaoX (2007) Focusing on practical issues: A permanent direction of library science. Journal of Library Science in China5: 16.
34.
YangMHKaurTFergusonAW. (2009) Asia: public libraries, academic libraries, special libraries, LIS education. IFLA Publications, pp.133–220.
35.
YangQHongQ (2013) The reasonability analysis of LIS courses in 8 universities in China. Journal of the National Library of China22(4): 33–43.
36.
YuL (2006) Library science education demands strategic thinking. Library and Information (4): 26–33.
37.
ZepkeNLeachL (2010) Improving student engagement: Ten proposals for action. Active Learning in Higher Education11(3): 167–177.
38.
ZhouLNunesM (2012) Identifying knowledge sharing barriers in the collaboration of traditional and western medicine professionals in Chinese hospitals: A case study. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science44(4): 238–248.
39.
ZhouLNunesM (2015) Knowledge Sharing in Chinese Hospitals: Identifying sharing barriers in traditional Chinese and Western medicine collaboration. Heidelberg: Springer.
