The theories of justice according to Rawls, Dworkin, Habermas and Sen, although from a predominantly Anglo-Saxon background, are useful for the Latin American reality. Such views of justice bring forward the requirement for developing indicators with a wider scope, so that they measure diverse aspects such as: income, commodities, freedoms, economic, cultural, educative, political and well-being factors. Concluding remarks summarize relevant aspects of justice that can enrich the needed reflection and discussion for new Latin American models of justice.
BarryB (1989) Theories of Justice (Vol. 1). California: University of California Press.
2.
CaballeroJ (2006) La teoría de la justicia de John Rawls. Voces y contextos2(1): 1–22.
3.
Center for Democracy and Governance (1998) Handbook of Democracy and Governance Program Indicators. Washington: U. S. Agency for International Development. Available at: http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/Pnacc390.pdf (accessed 15 June 2016).
DworkinR (1986). Law’s Empire. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
6.
HabermasJ (1998a) Debate sobre el liberalismo político. Barcelona: Paidós.
7.
HabermasJ (1998b) Facticidad y validez: Sobre el derecho y el estado democrático de derecho en términos de teoría del discurso (5th. ed.) Madrid: Trotta.
8.
MosseRSontheimerL (1996) Performance Monitoring Indicators Handbook. World Bank Technical Paper no. 334.Washington: World Bank.
9.
NozickR (1974) Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.
10.
PoggeTÁlvarezD (2010) Justicia global: Dos enfoques. Isegoría (43): 573–588.
11.
RawlsJ (1971) A Theory of Justice. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
