There are strong arguments about the positive effect of information and communication technologies (ICTs) on companies’ performance. This effect is also extensive for micro and small enterprises (MSEs), which tend to adopt ICTs in lower levels in comparison with large companies. In this context, this paper has two goals: to analyze the effect of firms’ size on (a) the relationship between strategic planning and ICTs use; (b) the relationship between ICTs use and interaction with customers. The sample of the study comprises 171 Brazilian MSEs, and we used confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling to test our hypotheses. The main results indicated that even in small companies, size is an important variable to explain the antecedents and consequents of ICTs use. The positive effect of ICTs use was stronger among small companies, reinforcing the relevance of technology for them.
AgarwalR (1998) Small firm survival and technological activity. Small Business Economics11: 215–224.
2.
AndersonJCGerbingDW (1988) Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin103(3): 411–423.
3.
AulakhPSKotabeMTeegenH (2000) Export strategies and performance of firms from emerging economies: Evidence from Brazil, Chile, and Mexico. The Academy of Management Journal43(3): 342–361.
4.
BagozziRPYiY (2012) Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science40(1): 8–34.
BarbosaDHMusettiMA (2010) Logistics information systems adoption: An empirical investigation in Brazil. Industrial Management and Data System110(6): 787–804.
7.
BeckTDemirguc-KuntA (2006) Small and medium-size enterprises: Access to finance as a growth constraint. Journal of Banking and Finance30: 2931–2943.
8.
BrenesERMetzgerMRequenaB (2011) Strategic management in Latin America: Issues and assessment. Journal of Business Research64(3): 231–235.
9.
ChangL-MChangS-IHoCTYenDCChiangM-C (2011) Effects of IS characteristics on e-business success factors of small- and medium-sized enterprises. Computers in Human Behavior27: 2129–2140.
10.
CireraXMarinAMarkwaldR (2015) Explaining export diversification through firm innovation decisions: The case of Brazil. Research Policy44(10): 1962–1973.
11.
ConnorT (1999) Customer-led and market-oriented: A matter of balance. Strategic Management Journal20: 1157–1163.
12.
CraggPBKingM (1993) Small-firm computing: Motivators and inhibitors. MIS Quarterly17(1): 47–60.
13.
DavisPSBabakusEEnglisPDPettT (2010) The influence of CEO gender on market orientation and performance in service small and medium-sized service business. Journal of Small Business Management48(4): 475–496.
14.
DonosoPCrittendenVL (2008) Strategic management in Latin America. Journal of Business Research61(6): 587–589.
15.
DuttaSEvrardP (1999) Information technology and organization within European small enterprises. European Management Journal17(3): 239–251.
16.
EllisPD (2006) Market orientation and performance: A meta-analysis and cross-national comparisons. Journal of Management Studies43(5): 1089–1107.
17.
FerreiraJBRochaASilvaJF (2014) Impacts of technology readiness on emotions and cognition in Brazil. Journal of Business Research67(5): 865–873.
18.
FornellCLarckerDF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research18(1): 39–50.
19.
FinkD (1998) Guidelines for the successful adoption of information technology in small and medium enterprises. International Journal of Information Management18(4): 243–253.
20.
GaskillLRAukenHEVKimH-S (1994) Impact of operational planning on small business retail performance. Journal of Small Business Strategy5(1): 21–35.
21.
HultGTMKetchenDJJrSlaterSF (2005) Market orientation and performance: An integration of disparate approaches. Strategic Management Journal26: 1173–1181.
22.
HwangY (2010) The moderating effects of gender on e-commerce systems adoption factors: An empirical investigation. Computers in Human Behavior26: 1753–1760.
23.
JaworskiBJKohliAK (1993) Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing57: 53–70.
24.
KaraASpillanJEDeshieldsOWJr (2005) The effect of a market orientation on business performance: A study of small-sized service retailers using MARKOR scale. Journal of Small Business Management43(2): 105–118.
25.
KeilMTanBCYWeiK-KSaarinenTTuunainenVWassenaarA (2000) A cross-cultural study on escalation of commitment behavior in software projects. MIS Quarterly24(2): 299–325.
26.
KelliherFReinlL (2009) A resource-based view of micro-firm management practice. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development16(3): 521–532.
27.
KoleMA (1983) Going outside for MIS implementation. Information and Management6(5): 261–268.
28.
KohliAKJaworskiBJ (1990) Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing54: 1–18.
29.
LaforetS (2008) Size, strategic, and market orientation effects on innovation. Journal of Business Research61:753–764.
30.
LevyMPowellP (2000) Information systems strategy for small and medium sized enterprises: An organizational perspective. Journal of Strategic Information Systems9: 63–84.
31.
LylesMABairdISOrrisJBKuratkoDF (1993) Formalized planning in small business: Increasing strategic choices. Journal of Small Business Management: 38–50.
32.
MalhotraRTemponiC (2010) Critical decisions for ERP integration: Small business issues. International Journal of Information Management30(1): 28–37.
33.
MichaelSC (2007) Can information technology enable profitable diversification? An empirical examination. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management24: 167–185.
34.
MillerNJBesserTLGaskillLRSappSG (2003) Community and managerial predictors of performance in small rural US retail and service firms. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services10(4): 215–230.
35.
MochMKMorseEV (1977) Size, centralization and organizational adoption of innovations. American Sociological Review42(5): 716–725.
36.
NascoSAToledoEGMykytynPPJr (2008) Predicting electronic commerce adoption in Chilean SMEs. Journal of Business Research61(6): 697–705.
37.
NguyenTHNewbyMMacaulayMJ (2015) Information technology adoption in small business: Confirmation of a proposed framework. Journal of Small Business Management53(1): 207–227.
38.
RajuPSLonialSCCrumMD (2011) Market orientation in the context of SMEs: A conceptual framework. Journal of Business Research64(12): 1320–1326.
39.
RobinsonRBLoganJESalemMY (1986) Strategic versus operational planning in small retail firms. American Journal of Small Business10(3): 7–16.
40.
SEBRAE – Serviço Brasileiro de Apoio às Micro e Pequenas Empresas [Brazilian Micro and Small Business Support Service] (2014) Anuário do Trabalho na Micro e Pequena Empresa [Job Yearbook of Brazilian Micro and Small Enterprises]. Available at: http://www.sebrae.com.br/. Accessed: October 10, 2015.
41.
SlaterSFNarverJC (1998) Customer-led and market-oriented: Let’s not confuse the two. Strategic Management Journal19: 1001–1006.
42.
SlaterSFNarverJC (1999) Market-oriented is more than being customer-led. Strategic Management Journal20: 1165–1168.
43.
ThongJYL (1999) An integrated model of information systems adoption in small businesses. Journal of Management Information Systems15(4): 187–214.
44.
YenHRSheuC (2004) Aligning ERP implementation with competitive priorities of manufacturing firms: An exploratory study. International Journal of Production Economics92: 207–220.
