The aim of this paper is to develop the findings of previous research on policies regarding online proactive information disclosure, both voluntary and mandatory. We present and analyze new evidence on the factors that influence decisions taken in this respect. This study is focused on Central America, a region that has received little previous research attention on these issues. To achieve the study goals, we analyze the online information disclosure made by local authorities, regarding both the degree of compliance with legal requirements and the volume of information provided voluntarily. Finally, with respect to the same two types of information provision, we determine the influence of environmental factors on online information disclosure. The results obtained show that transparency is more an issue of attitude than of laws, and highlight the existence of a large gap between legal requirements and actual performance.
AlbalateD (2013) The institucional, economic and social determinants of local government transparency. Journal of Economic Policy Reform16(1): 90–107.
2.
AltJDreyerD (2006) Fiscal transparency, political parties and debt in OECD countries. European Economic Review50(6):1403–1439.
3.
BaginskiSPHassellJMKimbroughMD (2004) Why do managers explain their earnings forecasts?. Journal of Accounting Research42(1): 1–29.
4.
BajoEBigelliMHillierDPetracciB (2009) The determinants of regulatory compliance: An analysis of insider trading disclosures in Italy. Journal of Business Ethics90(3): 331–343.
5.
BanksWFisherJNelsonM (1997) University accountability in England, Wales and Northern Ireland: 1992-1994. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation6(2): 211–227.
6.
BertotJCJaegerPTGrimesJ (2010) Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly27(3): 264–271.
7.
CaamañoJLagoSReyesFSantiagoA (2011) Budget transparency in local governments: An empirical analysis. International Studies Program, Working Paper pp.11–02. Georgia State University.
8.
CabaMCRodríguezMPLópezA (2008) E-Government process and incentives for online public financial information. Online Information Review32(3): 379–400.
9.
CabaMCRodríguezMPLópezA (2014) The determinants of government financial reports online. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences42: 5–37.
10.
ChanHChowK (2007) Public management policy and practice in Western China: Metapolicy, tacit knowledge, and implications for management innovation transfer. American Review of Public Administration37(4): 479–497.
11.
CherryMMcMenemyD (2013) Freedom of information and vexatious requests – The case of Scottish local government. Government Information Quarterly30: 257–266.
12.
Da CostaJBCamõesPJorgeSFernándesM (2007) Conformity and diversity of accounting and financial reporting practices in Portuguese local government. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences24(1): 2–14.
13.
DarchCUnderwoodP (2010) Freedom of Information in the Developing World: Demand, Compliance and Democratic Behaviours. Chandos.
14.
DasUQuintinMChenardK (2004) Does regulatory governance matter for financial system stability?: An empirical analysis. Bank of Canada Working Paper.
EscalerasMLinSRegisterC (2010) Freedom of information acts and public sector corruption. Public Choice145: 435–460.
17.
EstellerAPolo-OteroJ (2012) Fiscal transparency. Why does your local government respond?Public Management Review14(8): 1153–1173.
18.
GallegoIGarcíaIMRodríguezL (2009) Universities’ websites: Disclosure practices and the revelation of financial information. The International Journal of Digital Accounting Research9: 153–192.
19.
GandíaJLArchidonaMC (2008) Determinants of website information by Spanish city councils. Online Information Review32(1): 35–57.
20.
García-SánchezIFríasJRodríguezL (2013) Determinants of corporate social disclosure in Spanish local governments. Journal of Cleaner Production39: 60–72.
21.
GrimmelikhuijsenS (2009) Transparency of local public decision-making: Towards trust or demystification of government?Annual Conference of EGPA, Malta, 2–5September.
22.
GrimmelikhuijsenSWelchE (2012) Developing and testing a theoretical framework for computer-mediated transparency of local governments. Public Administration Review72(4): 562–571.
23.
GuillamónMDBastidaFBenitoB (2011) The determinants of local government’s financial transparency. Local Government Studies37(4): 391–406.
IslamR (2006) Does more transparency go along with better governance?. Economics & Politics18(2): 121–167.
26.
JorgeSMouraPPattaroAFand LourençoRP (2011) Local government financial transparency in Portugal and Italy: A comparative exploratory study on its determinants. CIGAR Conference, Ghent (Belgium) 9-10 June.
27.
KasznikRLevB (1995) To warn or not to warn: Management disclosures in the face of an earnings surprise. Accounting review113–134.
28.
KockNGaskinsL (2014) El papel mediador de Voz y Rendición de Cuentas en la relación entre la difusión de Internet y de Gobierno Corrupción en América Latina y el África subsahariana. Tecnología de la Información para el Desarrollo20(1): 23–43.
29.
LaswadFFisherROyelereP (2005) Determinants of voluntary Internet financial reporting by local government authorities. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy24: 101–121.
30.
MarcuccioMSteccoliniI (2009) Patterns of voluntary extended performance reporting in Italian local authorities. International Journal of Public Sector Management22(2): 146–167.
31.
MoonMJ (2002) The evolution of e-government among municipalities: Rhetoric or reality?Public Administration Review62(4): 424–433.
32.
NeumanL (2006) Mechanisms for monitoring and enforcing the right to information around the world. In Access to Information: Building a Culture of Transparency. Carter Center.
PinaVTorresLRoyoS (2007) Are ICT’s improving transparency and accountability in the EU regional and local governments? An empirical study. Public Administration85(2): 449–472.
35.
PinaVTorresLRoyoS (2010) Is e-government leading to more accountable and transparent local governments? An overall view. Financial Accountability & Management26(1): 3–20.
RellyJECuillierD (2010) A comparison of political, cultural, and economic indicators of access to information in Arab and non-Arab states. Government Information Quarterly27(4): 360–370.
38.
RobertsA (2006) Blacked Out: Government secrecy in the information age. New York: Cambridge University Press.
39.
SabaR (2004) El derecho de la persona a acceder a la información en poder del gobierno. Revista de Derecho Comparado de la información3: 145–185.
40.
SerranoCRuedaMPortilloP (2009) Factors influencing e-disclosure in local public administrations. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy27(2): 355–37.
41.
SuchmanMC (1995) Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review20(3): 571–610.
42.
TolbertCJMossbergerK (2006) The effects of e-government on trust and confidence in government. Public Administration Review66(3): 354–369.
43.
TolbertCJMossbergerKMcNealR (2008) Institutions, policy and e-government in the American States. Public Administration Review68(3): 549–563.
WorthyB (2013) Freedom of information and the MPs’ expenses scandal. In: HudsonJ. (Ed.) At the Public’s Expense? The Political Consequences of the 2009 British MPs’ Expenses Scandal. London: LB Tauris, pp-31–45.
46.
XiaoJYangHChowC (2004) The determinants and characteristics of voluntary internet-based disclosures by listed Chinese companies. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy23(3): 191–225.
