While Nigeria began its e-government initiatives in the early 2000s, the country is still in the early stages of e-government development, with very low e-government diffusion among its population. Through the administration of survey questionnaires, this paper first identifies the benefits of e-government, and then examines factors of e-government diffusion in Nigeria via three theoretical models of innovation diffusion (Technology Acceptance Model, Diffusion of Innovation theory, and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology). Results of the study suggest that the anticipated benefits of e-government in Nigeria are similar to those found in other studies in the e-government literature. Prominent factors of e-government diffusion found in the study capture the dimensions of the three theories. However, due to the unique nature of the Nigerian context, two factors (trust in government and reliable electricity supply) of e-government diffusion identified in the study are not within the dimensions of the theoretical models. The paper suggests that the Nigerian government should address the factors identified in the study (such as reliable electricity supply, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, relative advantage, etc.) in order to facilitate e-government diffusion in the country. The study therefore provides a basis within which policy makers should aim to improve the deployment and diffusion of e-government in Nigeria.
AdeyemiJAwojobiEOsisanwoTAppaHEzeuduBAghamaE (2014) Information society in Nigeria: the role of government and private sectors. Kuwait Chapter of Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review3(7): 85–100.
2.
AdeyemoA (2011) E-government implementation in Nigeria: an assessment of Nigeria’s global e-government ranking. Journal of Internet and Information System2(1): 11–19.
3.
AgunloyeO (2010) Progress on Nigeria’s e-government and e-payment projects. Paper presented at the AITEC Banking and Mobile Money Conference, Lagos, 11–12May.
4.
Akpan-ObongP (2007) Information and communication technologies in development: contextuality and promise. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Social Implications of Computers in Developing Countries, São Paulo, Brazil, May28–30.
5.
ApuluILathamAMoretonR (2011) Factors affecting the effective utilization and adoption of sophisticated ICT solutions: case studies of SMEs in Lagos, Nigeria. Journal of Systems and Information Technology13(2): 125–143.
6.
ApuluILathamA (2010) Benefits of information and communication technology in small and medium sized enterprises: A case study of a Nigerian SME. Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference, UK Academy for Information Systems, Oriel College, University of Oxford, Oxford, 23–24March.
7.
ArikpoIOsofisanAUsoroA (2009) Bridging the digital divide: the Nigerian journey so far. International Journal of Global Business2(1): 181–204.
8.
AsogwaB (2013) Electronic government as a paradigm shift for efficient public services: opportunities and challenges for Nigerian government. Library Hi Tech31(1): 141–159.
9.
AyoCEkongU (2008) E-voting implementation in Nigeria: Prospects and challenges. Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on e-Government, Lausanne, 10–11July.
10.
AzeezNAbidoyeAAdesinaAAgbeleKVenterIOyewoleA (2012) Threats to e-government implementation in the civil service: Nigeria as a case study. The Pacific Journal of Science and Technology13(1): 398–402.
11.
BannisterFConnollyR (2015) The great theory hunt: Does e-government really have a problem?Government Information Quarterly32: 1–11.
12.
BelangerFCarterL (2008) Trust and risk in e-government adoption. Journal of Strategic Information Systems17: 165–176.
13.
BenbasatIBarkiH (2007) Quo vadis TAM. Journal of the Association for Information Systems8(4): 211–218.
14.
CarterLBelangerF (2005) The utilization of e-government services: Citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Information Systems Journal15(1): 5–25.
15.
CarterLWeerakkodyV (2008) E-government adoption: A cultural comparison. Information Systems Frontiers10(4): 473–482.
16.
ChangICLiYCHungWFHwangHG (2005) An empirical study on the impact of quality antecedents on tax payers’ acceptance of Internet tax-filing systems. Government Information Quarterly22(3): 389–410.
17.
ChenCTsengSHuangH (2006) A comprehensive study of the digital divide phenomenon in Taiwanese government agencies. International Journal of Internet and Enterprise Management4(3): 244–56.
18.
ChircuAMLeeDH (2005) E-government: Key success factors for value discovery and realization. E-Government: An International Journal2(1): 11–25.
19.
ChukueziCO (2009) Gender and renewable energy in rural Nigeria. International NGO Journal4(7): 333–336.
DanilaRAbdullahA (2014) User’s satisfaction on e-government services: An integrated model. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences164: 575–582.
22.
DavisonRMWagnerCMaLC (2005) From government to e-government: A transition model. Information Technology & People18(3): 280–299.
23.
DavisFD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly13(3): 319–340.
24.
DugdaleADalyAPapandreaFMaleyM (2005) Accessing e-government: challenges for citizens and organizations. International Review of Administrative Sciences71(1): 109–118.
25.
ElkadiH (2013) Success and failure factors for e-government projects: A case from Egypt. Egyptian Informatics Journal14: 165–173.
26.
Escobar-RodriguezTCarvajal-TrujilloE (2014) Online purchasing tickets for low cost carriers: An application of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model. Tourism Management43: 70–88.
27.
EyitayoO (2008) Internet facilities and the status of Africa’s connectivity. In AinaOMutulaSTiamiyuM (eds.) Information and Knowledge Management in the Digital Age: Concept, Technologies and African Perspectives. Third World Information Services, Ibadan. pp. 31–49.
28.
EzeaniC (2010) Information and communication technology: An overview. In MaduECEzeaniCN (eds.) Modern Library and Information Science for Professionals in Africa. TextKinks, Ibadan.
29.
FuchsC (2006) eParticipation research: A case study on political online debate in Austria. Research Paper No. 1, ICT&S Center, University of Salszburg, Salszburg, 1–26.
30.
GefenDKarahannaEStraubDW (2003) Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quarterly27(1): 51–90.
31.
GilbertDBalestriniPLittleboyD (2004) Barriers and benefits in the adoption of e-government. International Journal of Public Sector Management17(4/5): 286–301.
32.
GrimmelikhuijsenSPorumbescuGHongBImT (2013) The effect of transparency on trust in government: A cross-national comparative experiment. Public Administration Review73(4): 575–586.
33.
GuhaJChakrabartiB (2014) Making e-government work: Adopting the network approach. Government Information Quarterly31: 327–336.
34.
HeeksR (2006) Implementing and Managing E-government: An International Text. Sage, London.
35.
HuangZ (2007) A comprehensive analysis of US counties’ e-government portals: Development status and functionalities. European Journal of Information Systems16: 149–164.
36.
HuangZBenyoucefM (2014) Usability and credibility of e-government websites. Government Information Quarterly31: 584–595.
37.
HungSYChangCMYuTJ (2006) Determinants of user acceptance of the government services: The case of online tax filing and payment system. Government Information Quarterly23: 97–122.
38.
HusseinRMohamedNAhlanAMahmudM (2011) E-government application: An integrated model on G2C adoption of online tax. Transforming Government, People, Process, and Policy5(3): 225–248.
39.
ImJJSeoJW (2005) E-government in South Korea: Planning and implementation. Electronic Government: An International Journal2: 188–204.
40.
International Telecommunication Union (2014) Nigeria Profile(Latest Data Available: 2013). Available at: http://www.itu.int/icteye.
41.
KraemerKLKingJL (2003) Information technology and administrative reform: Will the time after e-government be different?Available at: http://www.crito.uci.edu.
42.
LayneKLeeJ (2001) Developing fully functional e-government: A four-stage model. Government Information Quarterly18: 112–113.
43.
MartinsCOlivieraTPopovicA (2014) Understanding the Internet banking adoption: A Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology and perceived risk application. International Journal of Information Management34: 1–13.
44.
Ministry of Communication Technology (2012) National Broadband Plan. Available at: (http://commtech.gov.ng).
45.
MooreGCBenbasatI (1991) Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research2(3): 192–222.
46.
National Information Technology Development Agency (NITDA) (2007) Our Mandate. Available at: (http://nitda.gov.ng).
47.
National E-government Strategies (NeGSt) (2004) Mission, Vision, and Objectives. Available at: (www.negst.com/mission.htm).
48.
National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) (2011) NBS Annual Abstracts of Statistics. Available at: (www.nigerianstat.gov.ng).
49.
NdouV (2004) E-government for developing countries: Opportunities and challenges. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries18(1): 1–24.
50.
OjhaASahuGPGuptaMP (2009) Antecedents of paperless income tax filing by young professionals in India: An exploratory study. Transforming Government: People, Process, and Policy3(1): 65–90.
51.
OshikoyaT WHussainMN (2007) Information technology and the challenge of economic development. In Opoku-MensahASalihMA (eds.) African E-Markets Information and Economic Development. Economic Commission for Africa, Addis Ababa, 43–76.
52.
PersaudASehgalP (2005) Attitudes and perceptions of Canadians towards e-government. Paper presented at the International Conference on e-Government, Suffolk University, Boston, MA, 19–20October.
53.
PhangCWSutantoJLiYKankanhalliA (2005) Senior citizens’ adoption of e-government: In quest of the antecedents of perceived usefulness. Paper presented at the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Big Island, HI, 3–6January.
54.
PonsA (2004) E-government for Arab countries. Journal of Global Information Technology Management7(1): 30–46.
55.
RanaNPWilliamsMDDwivediYKWilliamsJ (2011) Reflecting on e-government research: Toward a taxonomy of theories and theoretical constructs. International Journal of Electronic Government Research7(4): 64–88.
56.
RaoSTroshaniI (2007) A conceptual framework and propositions for the acceptance of mobile services. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research2(2): 61–73.
57.
ReddickCG (2005) Citizen-initiated contacts with government: Comparing phones and websites. Journal of E-Government2(1): 27–53.
58.
ReffatR (2003) Developing a successful e-government. Working paper, University of Sydney, Sydney.
59.
RogersEM (1983) Diffusion of Innovations. The Free Press, New York, NY.
60.
RogersEM (1995) Diffusion of Innovations. The Free Press, New York, NY.
61.
SaundersMLewisPThornhillA (2003) Research Methods for Business Students. 3rd ed. Prentice-Hall, Harlow.
62.
SchauppLCCarterLMcBrideME (2010) E-file adoption: A study of US taxpayers’ intentions. Computers in Human Behavior26: 636–644.
63.
ShareefMAKumarUKumarV (2009) Identifying critical factors for adoption of e-government. Electronic Government: An International Journal6(1): 70–96.
64.
ShareefMAKumarVKumarUDwivediYK (2011) E-government adoption model (GAM): Differing service maturity levels. Government Information Quarterly28: 17–35.
65.
SunPLKuCYShihDH (2015) An implementation framework for e-government 2.0. Telematics and Informatics32: 504–520.
66.
TolbertCMossbergerK (2006) The effects of e-government on trust and confidence in government. Public Administration Review66(3): 354–369.
67.
TornatzkyLKleinK (1982) Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption implementation: A meta-analysis of findings. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management29(1): 28–45.
68.
United Nations E-government Survey (2012) E-government for the People. United Nations, NY.
69.
United Nations E-government Survey (2014) E-government for the Future We Want. United Nations, NY.
70.
Van SlykeCVBelangerFComunaleCL (2004) Factors influencing the adoption of web-based shopping: The impact of trust. Database for Advances in Information Systems35(2): 32–49.
71.
VassilakisCLepourasGFraserJHastonSGeorgiadisP (2005) Barriers to electronic service development. e-Service Journal4(1): 41–63.
72.
VenkateshVMorrisMGDavisGBDavisFD (2003) User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly27(3): 425–478.
73.
WalczuchaRLemminkbJStreukensbS (2007) The effect of service employees’ technology readiness on technology acceptance. Information & Management44(2): 206–215.
74.
WangYSLiaoYW (2008) Assessing e-government systems success: A validation of the DeLone and McLean model of information systems success. Government Information Quarterly25: 717–733.
75.
WangpipatwongSChutimaskulWPapasratornB (2008) Understanding citizen’s continuance intention to use e-government website: A composite view of Technology Acceptance Model and computer self-efficacy. The Electronic Journal of e-Government6(1): 55–64.
76.
WarkentinMGefenDPavlouPARoseM (2002) Encouraging citizen adoption of e-government by building trust. Electronic Markets12(3): 157–162.
77.
WeerakkodyVDhillonG (2009) Moving from e-government to t -government: A study of process reengineering. In ReddickCG (ed.) Handbook of Research on Strategies for Local E-government Adoption and Implementation: Comparative Studies 1. Information Science Reference, Hershey, PA.
78.
WelchEWHinnantCCMoonMJ (2005) Linking citizen satisfaction with e-government and trust in government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory15(3): 371–391.
79.
World Bank (2013) World Development Indicators, 2011-2012. Country Statistics, Nigeria, Washington DC.
80.
WuY (2014) Protecting personal data in e-government: A cross-country study. Government Information Quarterly31: 150–159.
81.
YinR (2009) Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 4th. ed. Sage Publications, London.
82.
ZhengYSchachterHLHolzerG (2014) The impact of government form on e-participation: A study of New Jersey municipalities. Government Information Quarterly31: 653–659.
83.
ZhouT (2012) Examining location-based services usage from the perspectives of Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology and privacy risk. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research13(2): 135–144.
