South Korea is a world leader in human capital and research investment. However, compared to other countries with similar levels of resource input, Korea has relatively weaker output performance. This is a concern for the Korean government and the funding agencies that invest heavily in R&D activities. Since knowledge sharing among members influences the output performance within an R&D sector, this paper investigates the factors that affect the knowledge sharing intention and behavior among members of a national R&D center in Korea. A total of 286 members in the Biology Research Information Center participated in a survey. The results show that intrinsic and extrinsic motivations significantly influence the members’ intention to share knowledge. Cognitive and relational capital also exert significant effects on the members’ knowledge sharing intention. Structural capital, however, does not have any significant effect on intention. The members’ intention to share knowledge links significantly to their actual knowledge sharing behavior.
AbdullahNLHamzahNArshadRIsaRMGhaniRA (2011) Psychological contract and knowledge sharing among academicians: mediating role of relational social capital. International Business Research4: 231.
2.
AhnB-YLeeE-B (2009) A comparative analysis of bioinformation website services. Journal of Information Management (KISTI)40: 157–181.
3.
AjzenIFishbeinM (1980) Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
4.
AtkinsDEDroegemeierKKFeldmanSI. (2003) Revolutionizing science and engineering through cyberinfrastructure: Report of the National Science Foundation blue-ribbon advisory panel on cyberinfrastructure. Report of the National Science Foundation Blue-Ribbon Advisory Panel on Cyberinfrastructure. National Science Foundation.
5.
AuhSMengucB (2013) Knowledge sharing behaviors of industrial salespeople: An integration of economic, social psychological, and sociological perspectives. European Journal of Marketing47: 1333–1355.
6.
BartolKMSrivastavaA (2002) Encouraging knowledge sharing: The role of organizational reward systems. Journal of Leadership and Organization Studies9: 64–76.
7.
Battelle (2013) 2014 Global R&D Funding Forecast. R&D Magazine. Battelle.
BourdieuP (1986) The forms of capital. In: RichardsonJ (ed) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood, 241–258.
10.
BrownJSDuguidP (1991) Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science2: 40–57.
11.
BurtRS (1992) Structural Holes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12.
ChangHHChuangS-S (2011) Social capital and individual motivations on knowledge sharing: Participant involvement as a moderator. Information & Management48: 9–18.
13.
ChangYWongSFParkM-C (2014) A three-tier ICT access model for intention to participate online: A comparison of developed and developing countries. Information Development. Published online before print April 10, 2014, doi:10.1177/0266666914529294.
14.
ChenCJHungSW (2010) To give or to receive? Factors influencing members’ knowledge sharing and community promotion in professional virtual communities. Information & Management47: 226–236.
15.
ChoiJHScottJE (2013) Electronic word of mouth and knowledge sharing on social network sites: A social capital perspective. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research8: 69–82.
16.
ChenCM, L.J.CKinShuk (2009) Examining the factors influencing participants’ knowledge sharing behavior in virtual learning communities. Journal of Educational Technology & Society12: 134–148.
17.
ChiuCMHsuMHWangET (2006) Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision Support Systems42: 1872–1888.
18.
ChongSNormileD (2006) How young Korean researchers helped unearth a scandal. Science311: 22–25.
19.
ChowWSChanLS (2008) Social network, social trust and shared goals in organizational knowledge sharing. Information & Management45: 458–465.
20.
CohenDPrusakL (2001) In Good Company: How Social Capital Makes Organizations Work. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
21.
ColemanJS (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology94: S95–S120.
22.
ConstantDSproullLKieslerS (1996) The kindness of strangers: The usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice. Organization Science7: 119–135.
23.
CummingsJFinholtTFosterI. (2008) Beyond being there: A blueprint for advancing the design, development, and evaluation of virtual organization. Final Report from Workshops on Building Effective Virtual Organizations. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation58.
24.
De ClercqDDimovDThongpapanlNT (2013) Organizational social capital, formalization, and internal knowledge sharing in entrepreneurial orientation formation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice37: 505–537.
25.
DeciELRyanRM (1987) The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology53: 1024–1037.
26.
DuttaSLanvinB (2013) The Global Innovations Index 2013: The local dynamics of innovation. In: DuttaSLanvinB (eds.) The Global Innovations Index 2013: The Local Dynamics of Innovation. Geneva, Ithaca, and Fontainebleau: Cornell University, INSEAD, WIPO, 1–393.
27.
EkehPP (1974) Social Exchange Theory: The Two Traditions, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28.
FulkJYuanYC (2013) Location, motivation, and social capitalization via enterprise social networking. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication19: 20–37.
29.
GefenDKarahannaEStraubDW (2003) Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quarterly27: 51–90.
30.
HairJFBlackWCBabinBJAndersonRE (2009) Multivariate Data Analysis. New Jersey: Upper Saddle River, Pearson Prentice Hall.
31.
HanakiNNakajimaROguraY (2010) The dynamics of R&D network in the IT industry. Research Policy39: 386–399.
32.
HansenMT (1999) The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly44: 82–111.
33.
HazenBTCegielskiCHannaJB (2011) Diffusion of green supply chain management: Examining perceived quality of green reverse logistics. The International Journal of Logistics Management22: 373–389.
34.
HauYSKimYG (2011) Why would online gamers share their innovation-conducive knowledge in the online game user community? Integrating individual motivations and social capital perspectives. Computers in Human Behavior27: 956–970.
35.
HauYSKimBLeeHKimYG (2013) The effects of individual motivations and social capital on employees’ tacit and explicit knowledge sharing intentions. International Journal of Information Management33: 356–366.
36.
HuLRandelAE (2014) Knowledge sharing in teams: Social capital, extrinsic incentives, and team innovation. Group & Organization Management39: 213–243.
37.
HuangC-C (2009) Knowledge sharing and group cohesiveness on performance: An empirical study of technology R&D teams in Taiwan. Technovation29: 786–797.
38.
JungH (1996) Special Report: Specialized Research Information Center Project. Digital Library3: 46–51.
39.
KimTTLeeGPaekSLeeS (2013) Social capital, knowledge sharing and organizational performance: What structural relationship do they have in hotels?International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management25: 683–704.
40.
KimYJeongJLeeS (2007) A study on operational model of subject-based online community for open access system – with special reference to community service functions and researcher’s participation will. Journal of the Korean Society for information Management24: 5–31.
41.
LeeMC (2009) Factors influencing the adoption of Internet banking: An integration of TAM and TPB with perceived risk and perceived benefit. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications8: 130–141.
42.
LinCP (2011) Modeling job effectiveness and its antecedents from a social capital perspective: A survey of virtual teams within business organizations. Computers in Human Behavior27: 915–923.
43.
LinH-F (2007) Effects of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation on employee knowledge sharing intentions. Journal of Information Science33: 135–149.
MuraMLettieriERadaelliGSpillerN (2013) Promoting professionals’ innovative behaviour through knowledge sharing: The moderating role of social capital. Journal of Knowledge Management17: 527–544.
46.
MarwellGOliverP (1993) The Critical Mass in Collective Action: A Micro-Social Theory, New York: Cambridge University Press.
NahapietJGhoshalS (1998) Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. The Academy of Management Review23: 242–266.
49.
OlatokunWNwaforCI (2012) The effect of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation on knowledge sharing intentions of civil servants in Ebonyi State, Nigeria. Information Development28: 216–234.
50.
PoltWGasslerHSchibanyA. (2001) Benchmarking industry—science relations: The role of framework conditions. Science and Public Policy28: 247–258.
51.
PutnamRD (2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Touchstone.
52.
RidingsCGefenDArinzeB (2002) Some antecedents and effects of trust in virtual communities. Journal of Strategic Information Systems11: 271–295.
53.
ShengMHartonoR (2013) An exploratory study of knowledge creation and sharing in online community: A social capital perspective. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence(ahead-of-print), 1-15.doi:10.1080/14783363.2013.776769.
54.
TsaiWGhoshalS (1998) Social capital and value creation: An empirical study of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal41: 464–476.
55.
TsaiYHMaHCLinCPChiuCKChenSC (2014) Group social capital in virtual teaming contexts: A moderating role of positive affective tone in knowledge sharing. Technological Forecasting and Social Change86: 13–20.
56.
UslanerEM (2000) Social capital and the net. Communications of the ACM43: 60–65.
57.
WangSNoeRAWangZM (2014) Motivating knowledge sharing in knowledge management systems a quasi-field experiment. Journal of Management40: 978–1009.
58.
WaskoMMFarajS (2005) Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quarterly29: 35–57.
59.
WellmanBQuan-HaaseAWitteJ. (2001) Does the Internet increase, decrease, or supplement social capital? Social networks, participation, and community commitment. American Behavioral Scientist45: 437–456.
60.
WenJKobayashiS (2001) Exploring collaborative R&D network: some new evidence in Japan. Research Policy30: 1309–1319.
61.
WuJLuX (2013) Effects of extrinsic and intrinsic motivators on using utilitarian, hedonic, and dual-purposed information systems: A meta-analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Systems13: 153–191.
62.
Yli-RenkoHAutioESapienzaHJ (2001) Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology based firms. Strategic Management Journal22: 587–613.
63.
YoonCWangZW (2011) The role of citizenship behaviors and social capital in virtual communities. Journal of Computer Information Systems52: 106–115.
64.
YuYHaoJXDongXYKhalifaM (2013) A multilevel model for effects of social capital and knowledge sharing in knowledge-intensive work teams. International Journal of Information Management33: 780–790.
