Information and Communication Technologies for Development (ICT4D) scholars have often criticised that most researchers in this field tend not to use theory to build, test or extend further concepts in their projects (Ogan et al., 2009, Heeks, 2007) while Burrell and Toyama (2009) reflected that it is precisely because of its breadth and range of research that ICT4D lacks a common foundation of concepts and terms. Heeks (2007) lamented that very little work has been deduced from the ‘D’ of ICT4D. In this paper, the author will attempt to review recent literature which contributed to arguably the two most contentious concept-based researches in ICT for Development – Amartya Sen’s and philosopher Martha Nussbaum’s capabilities approach (Sen, 1999a, Nussbaum, 1988) against a very different vulnerabilities approach of poverty and debate the validity of both approaches to ICT4D research. This paper posits that both paradigms can be applied to the same development project depending on its enthymeme and suggests the acceptance that all of these viewpoints will and should continue to coexist within the realms of the academic and practitioner communities for the benefit of this new and emerging field called ICT4D.
AbrahamR (2007) Mobile phones and economic development: evidence from the fishing industry in India. Information Technologies & International Development4(1): 5–17.
2.
AlampayEA (2006) Beyond access to ICTs: measuring capabilities in the information society. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT2(3).
3.
AlkireS (2007) Choosing dimensions: the capability approach and multidimensional poverty. Chronic Poverty Research Centre Working Paper No. 88.
4.
AlwangJSiegelPBJorgensenSL (2001) Vulnerability: a view from different disciplines. Social protection discussion paper series. Human Development Network - The World Bank, 1–42.
5.
AnandSSenA (2000) The income component of the Human Development Index. Journal of Human Development1: 83–106.
6.
ArdicN (2012) Understanding the ‘Arab Spring’: justice, dignity, religion and international politics. Afro Eurasian Studies1(1): 8–52.
7.
AshleyCCarneyD (1999) Sustainable livelihoods: lessons from early experience. London: Department for International Development (DFID) - United Kingdom, 1–65.
8.
BarjaGGiglerB-S (2005) The concept of information poverty and how to measure it in the Latin American context. In: GalperinHMariscalJ (eds) Regional dialog on the information society (DIRSI). Uraguay: International Development Research Centre (Canada), 11–28.
9.
BasuK (2001) On the goals of development. In: MeierGMStiglitzJE (eds) Frontiers of development economics: The future in perspective. New York: Oxford University Press, 66–101.
10.
BirdsallWF (2011) Human capabilities and information and communication technology: the communicative connection. Ethics and Information Technology13: 93–106.
11.
BirkmannJFernandoN (2008) Measuring revealed and emergent vulnerabilities of coastal communities to tsunami in Sri Lanka. Disasters32: 82–105.
12.
BohleHG (2001) Vulnerability and criticality: perspectives from social geography. IHDP update, 2: 3–5.
13.
BriguglioL (1997) Alternative economic vulnerability indices for developing countries. Report prepared for the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
14.
BrownAEGrantGG (2010) Highlighting the duality of the ICT and development research agenda. Information Technology for Development16: 96–111.
15.
BucheleSFOwusu-AningR (2007) The one laptop per child (OLPC) project and its applicability to Ghana. Proceedings of the 2007 International Conference on Adaptive Science and Technology. 113–118.
16.
BurrellJToyamaK (2009) What constitutes good ICTD research?USC Annenberg School for Communication5: 82–94.
ChibAAleK (2009) Extending the technology-community-management model to disaster recovery: assessing vulnerability in rural Asia. In: International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development (ICTD) 2009, Doha, 17–19 April 2009, pp.328–336.
19.
ChibALwinMOAngJ. (2008) Midwives and mobiles: using ICTs to improve healthcare in Aceh Besar, Indonesia 1. Asian Journal of Communication18: 348–364.
20.
ChokoshviliD (2011) The role of the Internet in democratic transition: case study of the Arab Spring. Department of Public Policy – Central European University. Budapest, Nádor utca9: 51.
21.
ClarkeAC. (2005) Communications for goodness' sake. Promoting ICT for Human Development in Asia 2004: Realizing the Millennium Development Goals. India: Elsevier,
v–vi.
22.
CohenN (2001) What works: Grameen telecom’s village phones. A Digital Dividend Study by The World Resources Institute. World Resources Institute – Digital Dividend.
23.
CommosioungMDugganEW (2008) Increasing competitiveness in SIDS by building ICT resilience: an extension of the vulnerability hypothesis framework. The Round Table97: 397–417.
24.
CorbridgeS (2002) Development as freedom: the spaces of Amartya Sen. Progress in Development Studies2: 183–217.
25.
DuncombeR (2006) Using the livelihoods framework to analyze ICT applications for poverty reduction through microenterprise. Information Technologies & International Development3: 81–100.
26.
EasterlyW (2001) The elusive quest for growth: economists' adventures and misadventures in the tropics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27.
EllisF (2000) Rural livelihoods and diversity in developing countries. Oxford University Press.
28.
EscobarA (1985) Encountering development: the making and unmaking of the Third World. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
29.
EstevaG (1992) “Development”. In: SachsW (ed) The development dictionary: a guide to knowledge as power. London: Zed Books, 6–26.
30.
FieldingD. (2002) Health and wealth: a structural model of social and economic development. Review of Development Economics6: 393–414.
31.
Fukuda-ParrS (2011) Theory and policy in international development: human development and capability approach and the Millennium Development Goals. International Studies Review13: 122–132.
32.
GarnhamN (1999) Amartya Sen’s ‘‘capability’’ approach to the evaluation of welfare: its application to communications. In: CalabreseABurgelmanJ-C (eds) Communication, citizenship, and social policy: rethinking the limits of the welfare state. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
33.
GasperD (2002) Is Sen's capability approach an adequate basis for considering human development?Review of Political Economy14: 435–461.
34.
GreenbergA (2005) ICTs for poverty alleviation: basic tool and enabling sector. In: TröftenP-E (ed). Montreal, Quebec, Canada H4A 3N5: Sida - ICT for Development Secretariat, Department for Infrastructure and Economic Cooperation, 1–60.
35.
GrunfeldH (2007) Framework for evaluating contributions of ICT to capabilities, empowerment and sustainability in disadvantaged communities. In: CPRsouth2 Conference, Chennai, India, 15–17 December 2007, pp.1–21.
36.
HaqM (1995) Reflections on human development. New York: Oxford University Press.
37.
HawkinsR. (2002) Ten lessons for ICT and education in the developing world. The Global Information Technology Report 2001–2002: readiness for the networked world. The World Bank Institute, 38–43.
38.
HeeksR (2007) Theorizing ICT4D research. Information Technologies & International Development3: 1–4.
39.
HeeksR (2008) ICT4D 2.0: The next phase of applying ICT for international development. Computer41: 26–33.
40.
HeijmansA (2001) Vulnerability: a matter of perception. Disaster Management Working Paper 4/2001. London: Benfield Greig Hazard Research Centre, 1–17.
41.
InfoDev (2008) Enhancing the livelihoods of the rural poor through ICT, a knowledge map. In: McNamaraK (ed) Working Paper No. 9. InfoDev.
42.
JamesJ (2005) Technological blending in the age of the Internet: a developing country perspective. Telecommunications Policy29: 285–296.
43.
JamesJ (2010) New technology in developing countries: a critique of the one-laptop-per-child program. Social Science Computer Review28: 381–390.
44.
JensenR (2007) The digital provide: Information (technology), market performance, and welfare in the South Indian fisheries sector. The Quarterly Journal of Economics122: 879–924.
45.
KalyUPrattCRMitchellJ. (2003) The demonstration Environmental Vulnerability Index (EVI). South Pacific Applied Geoscience Commission (SOPAC) Technical Report 384. Suva, Fiji.
46.
KanburRSquireL (1999) The evolution of thinking about poverty: exploring the interactions. The World Bank, Washington DC.
47.
KarnaniA (2007) Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid: a mirage. California Management Review. University of Michigan-Stephen M. Ross School of Business, 42.
48.
KhanAA (2012) The role social of media and modern technology in Arab Spring. Far East Journal of Psychology and Business7: 56–63.
49.
KraemerKLDedrickJSharmaP (2009) One laptop per child: vision vs. reality. Communications of the ACM52: 66–73.
50.
LandrumNE (2007) Advancing the “base of the pyramid” debate. Strategic Management Review1: 1–12.
51.
LigonESchechterL (2003) Measuring vulnerability. The Economic Journal113: C95–C102.
52.
MansellR (2006) Ambiguous connections: entitlements and responsibilities of global networking. Journal of International Development18: 901–913.
53.
McNamaraK (2003) Information and communication technologies, poverty and development: learning from experience. In: infoDev Annual Symposium. Geneva, Switzerland, 9–10 December 2003, pp. i–86. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
54.
MoserC (1996) Confronting crisis. a comparative study of household responses to poverty and vulnerability in four poor urban communities. Environmentally Sustainable Development Studies and Monographs Series No. 8. Washington, DC: The World Bank, 112.
55.
MoserC (2001) Insecurity and social protection–has the World Bank got it right?Journal of International Development13: 361–368.
56.
MunozH (1981) From dependency to development : strategies to overcome underdevelopment and inequality, Boulder: Westview.
57.
NgwenyamaOAndoh-BaidooFKBollouF. (2006) Is there a relationship between ICT, health, education and development? An empirical analysis of five West African Countries from 1997–2003. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries23.
58.
NussbaumMC (1988) Nature, functioning and capability: Aristotle on political distribution. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy6.
59.
OganCLBashirMCamajL. (2009) Development communication: the state of research in an era of ICTs and globalization. International Communication Gazette71: 655–670.
60.
OLPC (2013) OLPC's mission is to empower the world's poorest children through education. Available at: http://one.laptop.org/about/mission(accessed 12 April 2013)
61.
OosterlakenIHovenJVD (2011) Editorial: ICT and the capability approach. Ethics and Information Technology13: 65–67.
62.
PrahaladCK (2009) The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid: eradicating poverty through profits – 5th anniversary ed. revised and updated, New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc.
63.
PrahaladCKHammondA (2002) Serving the world's poor, profitably. Harvard Business Review80: 48–59.
64.
RatanALBailurS (2007) Welfare, agency and ICT for development. Information and Communication Technologies and Development (ICTD) Conference 2007. 1–12.
65.
RawlsJ (2001) The law of peoples: with” The idea of public reason revisited”: Harvard University Press.
66.
RichardsonDRamirezRHaqM (2000) Grameen Telecom’s village phone programme in rural Bangladesh: a multi-media case study. Report for the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA), 17 March 2000. Ontario, Canada.
67.
RobeynsI (2000) An unworkable idea or a promising alternative? Sen's capability approach re-examined. Center for Economic Studies - Discussions Paper Series (DPS) 00.30. Cambridge, UK: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven - Faculty of Economics and Applied Economics, Department of Economics, 1–32.
68.
RoemerJE (1998) Theories of distributive justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
SchipperLPellingM (2006) Disaster risk, climate change and international development: scope for, and challenges to, integration. Disasters30: 19–38.
71.
SenA (1985) Well-being, agency and freedom: the Dewey lectures 1984. The Journal of Philosophy82: 169–221.
72.
SenA (1999a) Development as freedom, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
73.
SenA (1999b) The possibility of social choice. The American Economic Review89: 349–378.
74.
SenA (2005) Human rights and capabilities. Journal of Human Development6: 151–166.
75.
SenA (2010) The mobile and the world. Information Technologies & International Development6 (Special Issue): 1–3.
76.
TarafdarMSinghR (2011) A market separations perspective to analyze the role of ICT in development at the bottom of the pyramid. In: SIG GlobDev Fourth Annual Workshop, Shanghai, China, 3 December 2011, pp.1–17.
77.
ThapaDSeinMKSæbøØ (2012) Building collective capabilities through ICT in a mountain region of Nepal: where social capital leads to collective action. Information Technology for Development18: 5–22.
78.
ToreroMBraunJV (2005) Information and communication technologies for the poor. In: ToreroMBraunJV (eds) Information and Communication Technologies for Development and Poverty Reduction: The Potential of Telecommunications. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), 1–6.
79.
UNDP (2005) Promoting ICT for human development in Asia 2004: realizing the Millennium Development Goals. Report for the UNDP. Regional Human Development Report: Promoting ICT for Human Development in Asia. India: Elsevier.
WisnerB (2002) Who? What? Where? When? in an emergency: notes on possible indicators of vulnerability and resilience: by phase of the disaster management cycle and social actor. Environment and Human Security, Contributions to a workshop in Bonn. 23–25.
