Livestock are a key asset for the global poor. However, access to relevant information is a critical issue for both livestock development practitioners and the poor themselves. Therefore, the authors describe the development of the 3D Animal Health Resource Room (AHRR), a web-based environment to disseminate educational materials on key animal health and production constraints faced by the poor in Bolivia and India. The aim of the analysis was to explore the applicability and demand for a 3D resource as a ‘lead technology' or if the technology suited ‘lead users' only. The authors tested the 3D AHRR across seven non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in India and Bolivia. The results found that users prioritized the level of interaction or the social experience in the 3D space over content and immersion
AdupaJAsabaJ (2003) Electronic delivery of agricultural information to the rural communities in Uganda. Ontario: International Development Research Centre (IDRC).
2.
AhujaVUmali-DeiningerDde HaanC (2003) Market structure and the demand for veterinary services in India. Agricultural Economics29(1):27–42.
3.
AladwaniAPalviaP (2002) Developing and validating an instrument for measuring user-perceived web quality. Information and Management39 (6): 467–476.
4.
BrightmanD (ed) (2000) Emerging strategies for effective e-learning solutions. Learning Without Limits3 (2000). Available at:http://www.triagetraining.com/LwoL3.pdf
5.
ChapmanRTrippR (2003). Changing incentives for agricultural extension: a review of privatised extension in practice. ODI AgREN Network Paper No. 132, Overseas Development Institute, London.
6.
De HaanCSchillhorn Van VeenTBrandenburgBGautheirJLegallFMearnsRSimeonM (2001) Livestock development: implications for rural poverty, the environment and global food security. Washington DC: World Bank.
7.
FullerR (2006) Forging opportunities: a study of livelihoods and knowledge pursuit by poor urban livestock keepers in India and Bolivia. PhD thesis. Livestock Development Group, Reading: University of Reading.
8.
GlendenningCFicarelliR (2011) Content development and management processes of ICT initiative in Indian agriculture. Information Development27(4): 301–314.
9.
GroenewegKBuyuGRomneyDMinjauwB (2006) Livestock farmer field schools: guidelines for facilitation and technical manual. ILRI, Nairobi, Kenya.
10.
HeeksR. (2010) Development 2.0: the IT enabled transformation of international development. Communications of the ACM53(4): 22–24.
11.
HeffernanCMisturelliF (2000) The delivery of livestock services to the poor: findings from Kenya. Report for DFID’s Animal Health Programme. London: DFID.
12.
HeffernanCNielsenL (2007) The livestock guru: the design and testing of a tool for knowledge transfer among the poor. Information Technologies for International Development4(1): 113–121.
13.
HolzingerASmolleJReibneggerG (2005) Learning Objects (LO): an object oriented approach to manage e-learning content. In LazakidouA. (ed.) Encyclopaedia of Informatics in Healthcare & Biomedicine. Hershey, Pennsylvania: Idea Group.
14.
International Fund for Agricultural Development (2004) Livestock services and the poor. Report for the Global Initiative on Livestock Services and the Poor. Rome: World Bank and IFAD.
15.
JamesJ (2011) Internet skills in developing countries: how much do we know?Information Development27(2): 94–99.
LinYHeffernanC (2009) Addressing animal health knowledge gaps in southern countries: the creation of a 2D animal health resource room. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries39 (6) November.
18.
LinYHeffernanC (2010) Creating the Livestock Guru: ICTs to enhance livestock-related knowledge among poor households in Orissa, India. Tropical Animal Health and Production42:1353–1361.
19.
LeungWChenT (2003) A multi-user 3D virtual environment with interactive collaboration and shared whiteboard technologies. Journal of Multimedia Tools and Applications20 (1): 7–23.
20.
MoralMCerneaD (2005) Design and evaluate learning objects in the new framework of the semantic web. Formatex 2005. Available at:http://www.formatex.org/micte2005/357.pdf
21.
MortonJMatthewmanR (1996) Improving livestock production through extension. ODI Natural Resource Perspectives (12): November.
22.
MortonJWilsonR (2000) The institutional marginality of livestock production extension: the case of Burkina-Faso. Livestock Research for Rural Development12(1) http://lrrd.cipav.org.co/lrrd12/1/mor121.htm
23.
NielsenLHeffernanC (2006) New tools to connect people and places: the impact of ICTs on learning among resource poor farmers in Bolivia. Journal of International Development18 (6): 889–900.
24.
NielsenLHeffernanCLinYYuJ (2010) The Daktari: A multi-media learning program for poor livestock keepers in Kenya. Computers and Education54(2010): 1241–1247.
25.
O'LearyRRamsdenA (2002) Virtual learning environments: teaching. In: DaviesP. (ed.) The handbook for economics lecturers. Bristol: University of Bristol.
26.
OkadaA (2004) The collective building of knowledge in collaborative learning environments. In RobertsT (ed) Computer-supported collaborative learning in higher education. London: Idea Group Publishing.
27.
PatelN (2010) Not your average farmers: designing for lead users in ICT4D research. Interactions17(5):50–52.
PotW (2004) Means to improve social interaction in virtual learning environments. Paper presented atThe Twente Student Conference on IT, 2005. The Netherlands: University of Twente.
30.
RandolphTShellingEGraceDNicholsonCLeroyJColeDDemmentM.OmoreAZinsstagJRuelM (2007) Invited review: role of livestock in human nutrition and health for poverty reduction in developing countries. Journal of Animal Science85(11): 2788–2800.
31.
SabvasachiRRangnekarD (2007) Farmer participatory need-based extension (FPNE) approach: a sustainable model adopted by co-operative milk unions in Andhra Pradesh, India. Livestock Research for Rural Development19(10). http://lrrd.cipav.org.co/lrrd19/10/roy19144.htm
32.
SasidharPChandelB (2002) Rational delivery of private livestock extension services – interventions. Manage Extension Research Review3(2): 121–131.
33.
SemmensP (2004) The potential for learning objects to support flexible learning in higher education. Learning Technology Newsletter6(2): 23–27.
34.
ShibandaG (1991) Information for agriculture in Kenya. Information Development7(3): 141–146.
35.
SmithR (2004) Guidelines for authors of learning objects. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium (NMC).
36.
TavaresRHepworthMDe Souza CostaS (2011) Investigating citizens’ information needs through participative research: a pilot study in Candangolândia, Brazil. Information Development27(2): 125–138.
37.
UnwinT (2009) ICT4D: information and communication technology for development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38.
Von HippelE (1986) Lead users: a source of novel product concepts. Management Science32(7): 791–805.
39.
WadsworthJ (1990) Developing efficient extension strategies: results of an experiment involving Costa Rican livestock producers. Agricultural Systems, 34(3): 259–275.
WakeMLisgartenL (2003) In focus: VLEs and pharmacy-learning from experience. Pharmacy Education3(3): 209–214.
42.
WileyD (2000) Learning object design and sequencing theory. PhD Thesis. Provost, Utah: Brigham Young University.
43.
YuJHeffernanC (2011) The Livestock Guru: meeting the knowledge needs of poor livestock keepers in Tamil Nadu, India. The Journal of Knowledge Management and E-Learning3(2): 290–305.
44.
ZijpW. (1994). Improving the transfer and use of agricultural information: a guide to information technology. Washington, DC: World Bank.
