There is a growing interest in the INNOPAC library automation system, which has been implemented by several libraries in the Southern African region over the past 10 years. The majority of these libraries have installed this library system through consortia membership, and others have done it individually. This article evaluates the performance of the INNOPAC library system in five libraries in the Southern African region using the performance criteria of Functionality, Usability, Support and Training, and Vendor. The article identifies the strengths and weaknesses of the system, and makes recommendations for implementation in other similar libraries in the region. It also outlines a proposal for an INNOPAC-based consortium for the Southern African region.
*Mamvoto, J.T. ( 2005) Library automation at the University of Zimbabwe and other University libraries in Zimbabwe. Online. Available: http://ir.uz.ac.zw:8080/dspace/bitstream/uzlib/14/1/Mamvoto_conference_paper_final.pdf
10.
Myhill, M. ( 2000) Time for change, a personal insight into library system’s implementation: experiences at Exeter University Library. Program, 43(1), 89-101.
11.
*National University of Science and Technology (Zimbabwe). ( 2007). Online. Available: http://nust.ac.zw/library/index.htm
12.
Nfila, R.B., Dintwe, M.N. and Rao, K.N. ( 2005) Experiences of systems migration at the University of Botswana Library: a case study. Program: Electronic Library and information Systems, 39(3), 348-256.
13.
Reynolds, D. ( 1985) Library automation: issues and implications. New York: Bowker.
14.
Rowley, J. ( 1993) Computers for libraries. 3rd ed. London: Library Association .
15.
University of Namibia Library. (2007) Online. Available: http://library.unam.na/
16.
University of South Africa Library (2007). Online. Available: http://www.unisa.ac.za/library
17.
*N.B. The Zimbabwe websites were functioning at the time of writing, but are not responding at the time of going to press.
