The interest in knowledge management (KM) and its capabilities exists in all business sectors. Since 2009, and building on the result of Heisig's (2009) study, a few researchers have tried to create a new unified knowledge management framework, such as Evans et al. (2015) and Shongwe (2016). These frameworks and other heterogeneous knowledge management frameworks have been presented as holistic solutions that meet all sectors’ needs globally. Aiming to assist non-profit organizations implementing knowledge management programs, and as a part of a PhD thesis, this qualitative case study provides a practical and effective holistic KM framework dedicated to guiding NPOs in achieving their goals in serving surrounding communities and countries. This paper highlights pertinent issues in Knowledge Management framework development and implementation, which enhances the academic understanding and the practical implementation avenues for KM researchers and managers in the non-profit sector by suggesting common components of KM programs in NPOs led by a framework. This study is unique in presenting knowledge management components and framework derived from NPOs’ country, language, and culture to meet their specific needs and guide them in implementing successful KM programs.
Asrar-ul-HaqMAnwarS (2016) A systematic review of knowledge management and knowledge sharing: trends, issues, and challenges. Cogent Business & Management3: 1127744. DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2015.1127744.
2.
BashirKRehmanMBashirA, et al. (2022) Designing and evaluating a collaborative knowledge management framework for leaf disease detection. Computer Systems Science and Engineering42: 751–777. DOI: 10.32604/csse.2022.022247.
3.
BloiceLBurnettS (2016) Barriers to knowledge sharing in third sector social care: a case study. Journal of Knowledge Management20: 125–145. DOI: 10.1108/JKM-12-2014-0495.
4.
BluhmDHarmanWLeeTW, et al. (2011) Qualitative research in management: a decade of progress. Journal of Management Studies48: 1866–1891. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00972.x.
5.
BolisaniEBratianuC (2018a). The elusive definition of knowledge, pp. 1–22. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-60657-6_1.
6.
BolisaniEBratianuC (2018b). The emergence of knowledge managemen, 23–47. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-60657-6_2.
CabritaMRViedma MartiJM (2012). Entrepreneurial excellence in the knowledge economy-intellectual capital benchmarking systems. DOI: 10.1057/9781137024077.
10.
CallD (2005) Knowledge management - not rocket science. Journal of Knowledge Management9: 19–30. DOI: 10.1108/13673270510590191.
11.
CarterMCarterC (2020) The creative business model canvas. Social Enterprise Journal16: 141–158, ahead-of-print. DOI: 10.1108/SEJ-03-2019-0018.
12.
Casadesus-MasanellRRicartJE (2012) 22 Competing through business models1. Edward Elgar Publishing, Vol. 460.
13.
CentobelliPCerchioneREspositoE (2018) ‘Aligning enterprise knowledge and knowledge management systems to improve efficiency and effectiveness performance: A three-dimensional Fuzzy-based decision support system’, Expert Systems with Applications, 91, pp. 107–126.
ChenLFongP (2012) Revealing performance heterogeneity through knowledge management maturity evaluation: a capability-based approach. Expert Systems with Applications39: 13523–13539. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.07.005.
16.
ChooC (1996) The knowing organization: how organizations use information to construct meaning, create knowledge and make decisions. International Journal of Information Management Management16: 329–340. DOI: 10.1016/0268-4012(96)00020-5.
17.
ChuaA (2009) The dark side of successful knowledge management initiatives. Journal of Knowledge Management13: 32–40. DOI: 10.1108/13673270910971806.
CreswellJWPothCN (2016) Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Sage publications.
20.
CrickJ (2020) Qualitative research in marketing: what can academics do better?Journal of Strategic Marketing29: 1–40. DOI: 10.1080/0965254X.2020.1743738.
21.
DalkirK (2010) Measuring the impact of social media: connection, communication and collaboration. Social Knowledge24–36. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60960-203-1.ch002.
DavenportTH (2007) Information technologies for knowledge management. In: Knowledge Creation and Management: New Challenges for Managers. Oxford University Press, 97–117.
24.
DenieffeS (2020) Commentary: purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing25: 174498712092815. DOI: 10.1177/1744987120928156.
25.
DollahSAbduhARosmaladewiR (2017). Benefits and drawbacks of NVivo QSR application. DOI: 10.2991/icest-17.2017.21.
26.
EleziEBamberC (2018) A guiding conceptual framework for individualized knowledge management model building. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy6: 343–369. DOI: 10.25019/MDKE/6.3.01.
27.
EmmelN (2013) Sampling and Choosing Cases in Qualitative Research: A Realist Approach. Sage. DOI: 10.4135/9781473913882.
28.
EvansMDalkirKBidianC (2015) A holistic view of the knowledge life cycle: the knowledge management cycle (KMC) model. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management12(1): 47.
29.
FaniAAFardHD (2015) Knowledge management and organizational resilience in Iranian public organizations. Information and Knowledge Management5: 32–43, available at: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:55256845
30.
FaniAAHasanDYakhkeshiH (2017) Knowledge management and organizational resilience organizational learning as a mediator in Iranian public organizations. Information and Knowledge Management7: 37–48, available at: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:157304251
FteimiN (2015) Analyzing the literature on knowledge management frameworks: towards a normative knowledge management classification schema. In: European Conference on Information Systems. available at: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:16582701
33.
GaoFLiMNakamoriY (2002) Critical systems thinking as a way to manage knowledge. Systems Research and Behavioral Science20: 3–19. DOI: 10.1002/sres.512.
34.
GoswamiAAgrawalRGoswamiM (2021) Influence of national culture on knowledge management process: literature review and research agenda. Benchmarking: An International Journal28: 1186–1212, ahead-of-print. DOI: 10.1108/BIJ-04-2020-0171.
35.
GubaEG (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In: Handbook of Qualitative Research/Sage. Sage.
36.
HeisigP (2009) Harmonisation of knowledge management - comparing 160 KM frameworks around the globe. Journal of Knowledge Management13: 4–31. DOI: 10.1108/13673270910971798.
37.
HeisigP (2014). Knowledge management - advancements and future research needs - results from the global knowledge research network study, 151–182. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-09501-1_7.
38.
HenzJLOliveiraM (2024) Knowledge management implementation: a systematic literature review. Knowledge and Process Management31: 1–11. DOI: 10.1002/kpm.1780.
39.
HislopDBosuaRHelmsR (2018). Knowledge management in organizations: a critical introduction.
40.
HolzerABendahanSKocherB, et al., (2016). Fostering knowledge sharing in NGOs, 1–4. DOI: 10.1145/2909609.2909614.
41.
HsiehPLinBChinhoL (2009) The construction and application of knowledge navigator model (KNMTM): the evaluation of knowledge management maturity. Expert Systems with Applications36: 4087–4100. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.03.005.
42.
HubertC (2012). The new edge in knowledge: how knowledge management is changing the way we do business. DOI: 10.4043/23620-MS.
43.
HumeCHumeM (2008) The strategic role of knowledge management in nonprofit organizations. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing13: 129–140. DOI: 10.1002/nvsm.316.
44.
HumeMHumeC (2015) The critical role of internal marketing in knowledge management in not-for-profit organizations. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing27: 23–47. DOI: 10.1080/10495142.2014.934567.
45.
HumeCHumeM (2016) What about us? Exploring small to medium Australian not for-profit firms and knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management20: 104–124. DOI: 10.1108/JKM-12-2014-0497.
HusainSGulR (2019) Research trends in knowledge management: past. In: Proceedings of the 2019 3rd International Conference on Information System and Data Mining. Association for Computing Machinery, 208–217. DOI: 10.1145/3325917.3325949.
48.
HyanekVProuzovaZ (2015) Real structure of the NON-profit institutions’ funding resources: market or government?Equilibrium10: 151. DOI: 10.12775/EQUIL.2015.040.
49.
IfijehG (2011) ‘Budgeting for knowledge management in organizations’, Chinese Librarianship: an International Electronic Journal, No. 31, pp. 1–10. Available at:https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:167428885
50.
IsrailidisJSiachouEKellyS (2020) Why organizations fail to share knowledge: an empirical investigation and opportunities for improvement. Information Technology & People34: 1513–1539, ahead-of-print. DOI: 10.1108/ITP-02-2019-0058.
51.
JoyceAPaquinR (2016) The triple layered business model canvas: a tool to design more sustainable business models. Journal of Cleaner Production135: 1474–1486. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.067.
52.
KeaneSCormicanKSheahanJ (2018) Comparing how entrepreneurs and managers represent the elements of the business model canvas. Journal of Business Venturing Insights Insights9: 65–74. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbvi.2018.02.004.
53.
KhazievaNTomeECaganovaD (2018) Why knowledge management fails. In: European Conference on Knowledge Management. Academic Conferences International Limited, 390–XXVII.
54.
KongE (2010) Analyzing BSC and IC’s usefulness in nonprofit organizations. Journal of Intellectual Capital11: 284–304. DOI: 10.1108/14691931011064554.
55.
KroghGIchijoKNonakaI (2000). Enabling knowledge creation: how to unlock the mystery of tacit knowledge and release the power of innovation. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195126167.001.0001.
56.
KuanYWElaineA (2004) Knowledge management implementation frameworks. Knowledge and Process Management11: 93–104. DOI: 10.1002/kpm.193.
57.
KumarSGuptaS (2012) Role of knowledge management systems (KMS) in multinational organization: an overview. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering2(10): 8–16.
58.
LaiHChuT-H (2000). Knowledge management: a review of theoretical frameworks and industrial cases. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE, Vol. 10, pp. 2. DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2000.926705.
59.
LawtonG (2001) Knowledge management: ready for prime time?IEEE Computer34: 12–14.
60.
LeQTuamsukK (2019a). Developing of conceptual model of knowledge management to non-profit sectors, pp. 84–89. DOI: 10.1145/3355166.3355178.
61.
LeQTuamsukK (2019b). Developing of conceptual model of knowledge management to non-profit sectors, pp. 84–89. DOI: 10.1145/3355166.3355178.
62.
Le DinhTRickenbergTAFillHG, et al. (2015) Enterprise content management systems as a knowledge infrastructure: the knowledge-based content management framework. International Journal of E-Collaboration11: 49–70. DOI: 10.4018/ijec.2015070104.
63.
LucierC (2003) When knowledge adds up to nothing: why knowledge management fails and what you can do about it. Development and Learning in Organizations17: 32–35.
64.
LuneHBergBL (2017) Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences. Pearson.
65.
MakanjeraJ (2020) Exploring Strategies for Capturing Requirements for Developing ICT4D Applications, PhD Thesis. Walden University.
66.
MalhotraY (2003) Why Knowledge Management Systems Fail? Enablers and Constraints of Knowledge Management in Human Enterprises. Information Today, Vol. 1. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-24746-3_30.
67.
MalinJParalkarV (2018) Educational knowledge brokerage and mobilization: the marshall memo case. International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership12: 14. DOI: 10.22230/ijepl.2017v12n7a790.
68.
MarbergAKorziliusHKranenburgH (2019) What is in a theme? Professionalization in nonprofit and nongovernmental organizations research. Nonprofit Management and Leadership30: 125. DOI: 10.1002/nml.21355.
69.
MehmoodBRehmanH (2015) Aggregate production function for knowledge economies in asia: system gmm inference. In: Pakistan Economic and Social Review. Department of Economics, University of the Punjab, pp. 97–112.
70.
MeyerMHZackMH (1996) The Design and Development of Information Products. MIT Sloan Management Review.
71.
MicicR (2015) Leadership role in certain phases of knowledge management processes. Ekonomika61: 47–56. DOI: 10.5937/ekonomika1504047M.
72.
NahrNLehnerF (2016) Main research topics in knowledge management: a content analysis of ECKM publications. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management14: 5–17.
73.
NakashMBaruchson-ArbibSBouhnikD (2021) A holistic model of the role, development, and future of knowledge management: proposal for exploratory research. Knowledge and Process Management29: 1–8. DOI: 10.1002/kpm.1694.
74.
NonakaIKonnoN (1998) “The concept of ”Ba”: building a foundation for knowledge creation. California Management Review40: 40–54. DOI: 10.2307/41165942.
75.
NonakaIZhuZ (2012). Pragmatic strategy: eastern wisdom, global success. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511736568.
76.
NorthKKumtaG (2018). Knowledge management, value creation through organizational learning. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-03698-4.
77.
OsterwalderA (2004). The business model ontology – a proposition in a design science approach.
78.
PalinkasLHorwitzSMGreenCA, et al. (2013) Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and policy in mental health42: 533–544. DOI: 10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y.
79.
PattonM (2002) Two decades of developments in qualitative inquiry: a personal, experiential perspective. Qualitative Social Work1: 261–283.
PriorSGreenwoodMPriorS, et al. (2020) Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing25: 652–661. DOI: 10.1177/1744987120927206.
82.
Quimby-WorrellC (2019) Health literacy and type 2 diabetes in Barbados. Qualitative Report24(2): 319–332. DOI: 10.46743/2160-3715/2019.3762.
83.
RagsdellG (2013) Voluntary sector organisations: untapped sources of lessons for knowledge management. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Intellectual Capital, Knowledge Management & Organizational Learning, 349–355.
84.
RathiDGivenLForcierE (2016) Knowledge needs in the non-profit sector: an evidence-based model of organizational practices. Journal of Knowledge Management20: 23–48. DOI: 10.1108/JKM-12-2014-0512.
85.
RibeiroSNaganoM (2018) Main dimensions that impact knowledge management and university-business-government collaboration in the Brazilian scenario. Revista de Gestão Gest˜ao25: 258–273. DOI: 10.1108/REGE-05-2018-0074.
86.
RothbergHEricksonS (2016) Putting knowledge to work: the intelligent learning organization. In: European Conference on Knowledge Management. Academic Conferences International Limited, 780.
87.
SanderseJde LangenFPerezSF (2020) “Proposing a business model framework for nonprofit organizations”, English. Journal of Applied Economics and Business Research10(1): 40–53.
88.
Savin-BadenMMajorC (2023). Qualitative research: the essential guide to theory and practice. DOI: 10.4324/9781003377986.
89.
ShongweM (2016) An analysis of knowledge management lifecycle frameworks: towards a unified framework. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management14(3): 140–153.
90.
SimsekMDundarE (2017) Investigating EFL coursebook research in Turkey: trends in graduate theses of the 2001-2013 period. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice17: 969. DOI: 10.12738/estp.2017.3.0090.
91.
SivasubramanianSPerezM (2016) Process model for knowledge management. WD Info81: 1.
92.
SmitBOnwuegbuzieA (2018) Observations in qualitative inquiry: when what you see is not what you see. International Journal of Qualitative Methods17: 160940691881676. DOI: 10.1177/1609406918816766.
93.
SparvieroS (2019) The case for a socially oriented business model canvas: the social enterprise model canvas. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship10: 232–251. DOI: 10.1080/19420676.2018.1541011.
94.
SpenderJ-C (2014) Business Strategy: Managing Uncertainty, Opportunity, and Enterprise. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199686544.001.0001.
StoreyJBarnettE (2000) Knowledge management initiatives: learning from failure. Journal of Knowledge Management4: 145–156. DOI: 10.1108/13673270010372279.
97.
SztangretI (2015). IT business and science sector ecosystem vs. holistic knowledge relations model in selected cases. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.4218.9283.
98.
SztangretIGanassaliJ (2015). Holistic knowledge management model in the case of it sector. DOI: 10.5176/2251-2039_IE15.6.
99.
TengJSongS (2010) An exploratory examination of knowledge sharing behaviors: solicited and voluntary. Journal of Knowledge Management15: 104–117. DOI: 10.1108/13673271111108729.
ViaderAEspinaM (2014) Are not-for-profits learning from for-profit-organizations? A look into governance. Corporate Governance: International Journal of Business in Society14: 4. DOI: 10.1108/CG-11-2012-0083.
102.
WalshJBerkeryELannonJ (2023) Managing ambidexterity in a knowledge management strategy for an International Non-Governmental Organisation. European Conference on Knowledge Management24: 1732–1735. DOI: 10.34190/eckm.24.2.1436.
103.
WebbSP (2017) Knowledge Management: Linchpin of Change. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781351227223.
104.
WeberR (2007) Addressing failure factors in knowledge management. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management5: 333.
105.
WiigKM (1993) Knowledge management foundations : thinking about thinking : how people and organizations create. Represent and Use Knowledge / K.M. Wiig.
ZagzebskiL (2017). The lesson of gettier, 179–190. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198724551.003.0011.
108.
ZareMSardarAA (2019) Overview of the relationship between social capital and organizational readiness for implementing knowledge management in the defensive industry. available at: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:169778637
109.
ZylWRHenningSPollJA (2022) A framework for knowledge management system adoption in small and medium enterprises. Computers11(9): 128, available at. DOI: 10.3390/computers11090128. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-431X/11/9/128
