Tensegrity Systems and Geodesic Domes

Abstract

The name Buckminster Fuller is associated with the development of geodesic domes and with tensegrity systems. The principle of the latter is that rigidity is obtained by selfstressing alone. The shapes of domes constructed using tensegrity systems are not generally known a priori; these domes belong to the class of systems with indeterminate shape, such as cable systems. A form-finding method using the dynamic relaxation technique with attenuation of kinetic energy is presented here. The results given by this general method are compared with known solutions in certain cases and make it possible to quantify the deviations between geometries of tensegrity systems and polyhedral geometries.

An example is given to illustrate the possibilities of the combination of the principle of tensegity systems with that of geodesic domes. It is a double-layer, double-curvature system whose shape respects the selfstressing criterion. Industrial construction of the system can be envisaged thanks to the design of an assembly node which permits variations in curve radius.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Motro

, Review of the development of geodesic domes, in: Makowski

Z.S.

, ed, Analysis, Design and Construction of Braced Domes, Granada Publishing London, 1984, 387–411.

Fuller

R.B.

Synergetics explorations in the geometry of thinking, Collier Books, New York, 1975.

Edmondson

, The deresonated tensegrity dome, Synergetica Journal of Synergetics, 1 (4), 1986, 1–7.

Tardiveau

, Siestrunck R, Efforts et déformations dans les assemblages en treillis critiques et surcritiques en élasticité lineaire, Compte-rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, 280 (3), Paris, 1975.

Pellegrino

, Mechanics of kinematically indeterminate structures, PhD Thesis, University of Cambridge, 1986.

Tarnai

, Simultaneous Static and Kinematic Indeterminacy of Space Trusses with Cyclic Symmetry, Int. J. Solids Structures, 16, 1980 347–359.

Motro

Formes et Forces dans les Systèmes Constructifs. Cos des Systèmes Réticulés Spatiaux Autocontraints, Thèse d'Etat, Montpellier, 1983.

Cundall

, Explicite Finite Difference Methods in Geomechanics, in: Proceedings of the Conference on Numerical Methods in Geomechanics, 1976, 132–150.

Belkacem

, Recherche de forme par relaxation dynamique des structures réticulées spatiales autocontraintes, Thèse de Docteur-Ingénieur, Toulouse, 1987.

10.

Barnes

M.R.

, Form-finding, Analysis and Patterning of Tension Structures, in: Nooshin

, ed. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Space Structures. Elsevier Publishers, London, 1984, 730–737.

11.

Mincke

, Tensegrity Tragwerke, Zodiac 21, 1970.

12.

Pugh

An introduction to Tensegrity, University of California Press, Berkeley, 1976.

13.

Emmerich

D.G.

, Structures tendues et autotendantes. Monographies de géométrie constructive. Editions de l'Ecole d'Architecture de Paris La Villette, Paris, 1988.

14.

Vilnay

, Structures made of infinite regular tensegric nets, I.A.S.S. Bulletin, 63, 1977, 51–57.

15.

Vilnay

, Determinate Tensegric Shells, Journal of Structural Division ASCE, 107, NO ST10, 1981, 2029–2033.

16.

Emmerich

D.G.

, Equipartitions 2-Solides convexes et empilements, Editions de l'Ecole d'Architecture de Paris La Villette, Paris, 1987.

17.

Hanaor

, Preliminary investigation of Double-Layer Tensegrities, Proceedings of the International Conference on the Design and Construction of Non-Conventional Structures, 1987, vol. 2, pp 35–42.