The Second 'Equity Gap': Exit Problems for Seed and Early Stage Venture Capitalists and Their Investee Companies

Abstract

DR. GORDON MURRAY IS WITH THE WARWICK Business School, University of Warwick, England. The availability of venture capital funds for early stage investment (such as seed capital and start-up equity finance) remains limited in the United Kingdom. This paper investigates one element of the relationship between early stage venture capital investors and their larger, development capital counterparts. It is hypothesised that there could be a complementarity of activity between investors in early and later stage activities. Particularly, the later stage, venture (development) capitalists could provide a material source of follow-on funding for investee companies within the portfolios of the financially constrained, early stage funds. A population of fifteen UK venture capital organisations specialising in seed capital, start-up and early stage financing were identified. Twelve of these investors were interviewed using a telephone survey. The findings indicated that both parties rarely shared deal flow activity. While development capitalists were the preferred source of follow-on finance for their investee companies, the early stage respondents did not believe that development capitalists were, or would be in the future, an important means of either refinancing or exiting from their portfolio companies. The lack of provision of follow-on finance from the established venture capital industry suggests that the young, growing and potentially successful firm funded by an early stage investor faces a second equity gap. This gap occurs when the growing firm seeks additional finance for commercial expansion once the available resources from its early stage investor are exhausted.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bannock, G. (1991), Venture Capital and the Equity Gap, London, National Westminster Bank.

Binks, M. R. , Ennew, C. T. , and Reed, G. V. (1992), 'Information Asymmetries and the Provision of Finance to Small Firms', International Small Business Journal, 11, 1-1.

Bolton,J. E. (1971), SmallFirms, Report of the Committee of Enquiry on Small Firms, Cmnd. 4811, London, HMSO.

Brealey, R. , and Myers, S. (1984), Principles of Corporate Finance, (2nd Ed.), London, McGraw Hill.

British Venture Capital Association (1984-92), Annual Reports on Investment Activity, London, BVCA.

Butchart, R. L. (1987), 'A New Definition of the High-technology Industries', Economic Trends, 400, February, pp82-88.

Bygrave, W. D. , and Timmons, J. A. (1992), Venture Capital at the Crossroads, Boston MA, Harvard Business School Press.

Cabinet Advisory Council on Science and Technology (ACOST) (1990), The Enterpb,rise Challenge: Overcoming Barriers to Growth in Small Firms, London.

Confederation of British Industry (1993), Finance for Growth: Meeting the Needs of Small and Medium Enterprises, London, CBI.

10.

Cowling, M. , Samuels,J. , and Sugden, R. (1991), Small Firms and Clearing Banks, Report for the Association of British Chambers of Commerce, London.

11.

Department of Trade and Industry, The Insolvency Service (1992), Insolvency: General Annual Report for the Year 1991, London, HMSO.

12.

Dixon, R. (1991), 'Venture Capital and the Appraisal of Investments', Omega, 19, 5, pp333-344.

13.

European Venture Capital Association (1987-92), EVCA Yearbook: Venture Capital in Europe, Brussels, KPMG/EVCA.

14.

Flynn, D. M. (1991), 'The Critical Relationship Between Venture Capitalists and Entrepreneurs: Planning, Decision Making and Control', Small Business Economics, 3, pp185-196.

15.

Gorman, M. , and Sahlman, W. A. (1989), 'What Do Venture Capitalists Do?', Journal of Business Venturing, 4, pp231-248.

16.

Harrison, R. T. , and Mason, C. M. (1991), 'Informal Investment Networks: A Case Study from the UK', Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 3, pp269-279.

17.

KPMG Peat Marwick (1992), A Directory of Sources of Venture Capital Under 250,000, HMSO, London.

18.

Kay, J. (1992), 'Innovation in Corporate Strategy'. In Bowen, A., and Ricketts (eds.), Stimulating Innovation in Industry, NEDO, London.

19.

Keasey, K , and Watson, R. (1992), Investment and FinancingDecisions and the Performance of Small Firms, National Westminster Bank, London.

20.

Levy Gee (1992), The United Kingdom Venture Capital Database, Levy Gee Chartered Accountants, London.

21.

Lorenz, T. (1989), Venture Capital Today (2nd Ed.), Woodhead-Faulkner, London.

22.

MacMillan, I. C. , Siegal, R. , and Subba Narishima, P. N. (1989), 'Criteria Used by Venture Capitalists to Evaluate New Business Proposals', Journal of Business Venturing, 1,1, pp126-141.

23.

MacMillan, H. (1931), Report of the Committee on Finance and Industry, Cmnd. 3897, HMSO: London.

24.

Monck, C. S. P. , Porter, R. B. , Quintas, P. , Storey, D. J. , and Wynarczyk, P. (1988), Science Parks and the Growth of High-technology Firms, Croom Helm and Peat Marwick McLintock, London.

25.

Moore, B. (1993), Financial Constraints to the Growth and Development of Small, High-technology Firms, Small Business Research Centre, Cambridge University, England.

26.

Murray, G. C. (1991), Change and Maturity in the UK Venture Capital Industry, 1991-95, BVCA, London.

27.

Murray, G. C. , and Francis, D. (1992), The European Seed Capital Fund Scheme: A Review of the First Three Years, DGXXIII, Commission of the European Communities, Brussels.

28.

Murray, G. C. , and Lott,J. (1994 forthcoming), 'Have UK Venture Capitalists a Bias Against Investment in New Technology-based Firms?', Research Policy.

29.

National Economic Development Office (1992), 'Draft Report on the Financing of Biotechnology in the UK', London.

30.

National Economic Development Office (1986), External Capitalfor SmallFirms. A Review of Recent Developments. Committee on Finance for Industry, London.

31.

National Venture Capital Association (1992), 'Annual Report 1991', Venture Economics Inc., Arlington VA.

32.

Oakley, R. (1984), High-technology Firms, Francis Pinter, London.

33.

Organisation of Economic Co-operation and Development (1992), Industrial Policy in OECD Countries: Annual Review, OECD, Paris.

34.

Pavitt, K , Robinson, M. , and Townsend,J. (1988), 'A Fresh Look at the Size Distribution of Innovating Firms'. In Arcangeli, F. , David, P. , and Dosi, G. (eds.), The Diffusion of New Technologies: Modern Patterns in Introducing and Adopting Innovations, Oxford University Press, London.

35.

Poindexter, J. B. (1976), 'The Efficiency of Financial Markets: The Venture Capital Case', unpublished doctoral dissertation, New York University, New York Bulletin, 30(1), Feb., pp78-83.

36.

Roberts, E. B. (1991), Entrepreneurs in High-Technology, Oxford University Press, New York.

37.

Rothwell, R. (1989), 'Small Firms, Innovation and Industrial Change', Small Business Economics, 1, pp51-64.

38.

Small Business Research Trust (1990), Quarterly Survey of Small Firms in Britain, 6,2-2.

39.

Van Glinow, M. A. , and Mohrman, S. A. (1990), Managing Complexity in High-technology Organisations, Oxford.

40.

Wells, W. A. (1974), 'Venture Capital Decision Making', unpublished doctoral dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh.

41.

Wetzel, W. E. (1983), 'Angels and Informal Risk Capital', Sloan Management Review, 24, Summer, pp23-34.

42.

Wilson, H. (1979), The Financing of Small Firms, Interim Report of the Committee to Review the Functioning of Financial Institutions, Cmnd. 7503, HMSO: London.