Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

DR ALAN HANKINSON is with the Portsmouth Polytechnic Business School, England. This longitudinal investigation is an examination of output determination in a sample of 60 small engineering firms in the East Dorset and West Hampshire regions of England during the period of 1979-88. The work is a critical survey of the motivations behind output determination. The findings indicate disconcerting problems of output determination within the small firm of up to 100 employees but especially those in mechanical engineering compared with electrical engineering. As a result of these non-optimum attitudes to output determination, financial returns tended to remain disappointing for the small engineering firm. The author suggests that firms must appraise and monitor their performances more purposefully. Output must be regarded as an important aspect of marketing which the firm itself must control and not be regarded as an external factor beyond the firm's influence.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1 A. Hankinson , "The Investment Problem", 1983, Dorset Institute of Higher Education Monograph.

2 E. Ames , "Soviet Economic Processes", 1965, Irwin, Homewood, Ill., Reprinted in G.C. Archibald (ed), "The Theory of the Firm", 1971, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth.

3 M.J. Kafoglis , "Output of the Restrained Firm", 1969, American Economic Review.

4 H. Averch and L.L. Johnson , "Behaviour of the Firm Under Regulatory Constraint", 1962, American Economic Review.

5 J.L. Stein and G.H. Borts , "Behaviour of the Firm Under Regulatory Constraint", 1972, American Economic Review.

6 M. Chevalier and D. Zumino , "Product Line Strategy", 1974, Management Decision, Vol. 12, Part 3, pp 127-138.

7 S. K. Mullick and D. P. Haussener , "Production Decisions for New Products", 1974, Management Accounting, (USA), Vol. 56 Part 2, pp 27-32.

8 C.H. Nielsen , "The Price and Output Decisions of the Firm Under Uncertainty", Swedish Journal of Economics, 1975, Vol. 77, Part 4, pp 459-469.

9 D. Erlenkotter and R.R. Trippi , "Optimal Investment Scheduling with Price Sensitive Dynamic Demand", 1976, Management Science, Vol. 23, pp 1-11.

10.

10 D.M. Holthausen , "Input Choices and Uncertain Demand", 1976, American Economic Review, Vol. LXVI, pp 94-103.

11.

11 G. Gregory , S.A. Klesniks , and J.A. Piper , "Batch Production Decisions and the Small Firm", 1983, Journal of the Operational Research Society, (UK), pp 469-477.

12.

12 T.R. Saving , "Estimation of Optimum Plant Size by the Survivor Technique", 1961, Quarterly Journal of Economics, p 569-569.

13.

13 C. Pratten and R. Dean , "The Economics of Large Scale Production in British Industry", 1965, Department of Applied Economics, Occasional Paper No. 3, Cambridge University Press.

14.

14 C.D. Jones , "Consultancy in the Smaller Firm", Department of Industry, London, 1974.

15.

15 A. Hankinson , "The Investment Problem", 1983, Dorset Institute of Higher Education Monograph, pp 246-247.

16.

16 A. Hankinson , "Pricing Behaviour: A Study of Pricing Behaviour of Dorset-Hampshire Small Engineering Firms 1983-1985", ICMA supported project, Dorset Institute of Higher Education, 1985.

Small Firms' Output Determination: An Attitude Problem

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References