While opportunity beliefs, specifically the confidence in the viability of a new venture idea, are recognised as key drivers of entrepreneurial processes, the mechanisms through which they function remain unclear. We hypothesise that individuals adjust their opportunity confidence according to the valence of external assessments, with this effect amplified when the assessment comes from a prestigious source. Furthermore, we hypothesise that lower levels of opportunity confidence subsequently motivate efforts to revise the new venture idea. In two vignette experiments, we find empirical support for our hypotheses. In so doing, we offer insights into the cognitive mechanism through which assessment can motivate efforts to revise the content of new venture ideas as a way to (re)direct the entrepreneurial processes.
AlvarezSABarneyJB (2007) Discovery and creation: Alternative theories of entrepreneurial action. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal1(1–2): 11–26.
2.
AtkissonCO’BrienMJMesoudiA (2012) Adult learners in a novel environment use prestige-biased social learning. Evolutionary Psychology10(3): 519–537.
3.
BaerMBrownG (2012) Blind in one eye: How psychological ownership of ideas affects the types of suggestions people adopt. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes118(1): 60–71.
4.
BaronRMKennyDA (1986) The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology51(6): 1173–1182.
5.
BennettVMChatterjiAK (2023) The entrepreneurial process: Evidence from a nationally representative survey. Strategic Management Journal44(1): 86–116.
6.
BergenholtzCKlyverKVuculescuO (2023) Self-efficacy in disrupted environments: COVID-19 as a natural experiment. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice47(3): 724–750.
7.
BergerJCohenBPMorris ZelditchJ (1972) Status characteristics and social interaction. American Sociological Review37(3): 241–255.
8.
BorchertPSRochfordL (2017) Feedback valence during business idea development: Predictor of performance, motivator of change, or both?Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship29(5): 375–395.
9.
BohlmannCRauchAZacherH (2017) A lifespan perspective on entrepreneurship: Perceived opportunities and skills explain the negative association between age and entrepreneurial activity. Frontiers in Psychology8: 2015.
10.
BoudreauxCJNikolaevBNKleinP (2019) Socio-cognitive traits and entrepreneurship: The moderating role of economic institutions. Journal of Business Venturing34: 178–196.
11.
BriñolPPettyRE (2009) Persuasion: Insights from the self-validation hypothesis. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology41: 69–118.
12.
CamuffoACordovaAGambardellaA, et al. (2020) A scientific approach to entrepreneurial decision making: Evidence from a randomized control trial. Management Science66(2): 564–586.
13.
CardonMSZietsmaCSaparitoP, et al. (2005) A tale of passion: New insights into entrepreneurship from a parenthood metaphor. Journal of Business Venturing20(1): 23–45.
14.
CardonMSKirkCP (2015) Entrepreneurial passion as mediator of the self–efficacy to persistence relationship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice39(5): 1027–1050.
ChenJSCrosonDCElfenbeinDW, et al. (2018) The impact of learning and overconfidence on entrepreneurial entry and exit. Organization Science29(6): 989–1009.
17.
ChengJTTracyJL (2014) Toward a unified science of hierarchy: Dominance and prestige are two fundamental pathways to human social rank. In: The Psychology of Social Status. Springer, New York, NY, pp. 3–27.
18.
ChengJTTracyJLFoulshamT, et al. (2013) Two ways to the top: evidence that dominance and prestige are distinct yet viable avenues to social rank and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology104(1): 103–125.
19.
CloughDRFangTPVissaB, et al. (2019) Turning lead into gold: How do entrepreneurs mobilize resources to exploit opportunities?Academy of Management Annals13(1): 240–271.
20.
CrillyN (2018) ‘Fixation’ and ‘the pivot’: Balancing persistence with flexibility in design and entrepreneurship. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation6(1–2): 52–65.
21.
DalmasoMPavanGCastelliL, et al. (2012) Social status gates social attention in humans. Biology Letters8(3): 450–452.
22.
DavidssonP (2015) Entrepreneurial opportunities and the entrepreneurship nexus: A re-conceptualization. Journal of Business Venturing30(5): 674–695.
23.
DavidssonP (2023) Ditching discovery-creation for unified venture creation research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice47: 594–612.
24.
DavidssonPGruenhagenJH (2021) Fulfilling the process promise: A review and agenda for new venture creation process research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice45(5): 1083–1118.
25.
DavidssonPGrégoireDALexM (2021) Venture Idea Assessment (VIA): Development of a needed concept, measure, and research agenda. Journal of Business Venturing36(5): 106130.
26.
DimovD (2007) From opportunity insight to opportunity intention: The importance of person–situation learning match. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice31(4): 561–583.
27.
DimovD (2010) Nascent entrepreneurs and venture emergence: Opportunity confidence, human capital, and early planning. Journal of Management Studies47(6): 1123–1153.
28.
EngelYKaandorpMElfringT (2017) Toward a dynamic process model of entrepreneurial networking under uncertainty. Journal of Business Venturing32(1): 35–51.
29.
ElfringTKlyverKvan BurgE (2021) Entrepreneurship as Networking: Mechanisms, Dynamics, Practices, and Strategies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30.
FleurySAgnesACadosL, et al. (2020) Effects of social influence on idea selection in creativity workshops. Thinking Skills and Creativity37: 100691.
31.
FoulshamTChengJTTracyJL, et al. (2010) Gaze allocation in a dynamic situation: Effects of social status and speaking. Cognition117(3): 319–331.
32.
FreseMGielnikMM (2023) The psychology of entrepreneurship: Action and process. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior10(1): 137–164.
33.
GerpottFHLehmann-WillenbrockNSilvisJD, et al. (2018) In the eye of the beholder? An eye-tracking experiment on emergent leadership in team interactions. The Leadership Quarterly29(4): 523–532.
34.
GouldRV (2002) The origins of status hierarchies: A formal theory and empirical test. American Journal of Sociology107(5): 1143–1178.
35.
GrimesMG (2018) The pivot: How founders respond to feedback through idea and identity work. Academy of Management Journal61(5): 1692–1717.
36.
HenrichJ (2016) The secret of our success: How culture is driving human evolution, domesticating our species, and making us smarter. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
37.
JanischJVossenA (2022) Categorically right? How firm-level distinctiveness affects performance across product categories. Journal of Business Venturing37(4): 106228.
38.
JiangYDStraubCKlyverK, et al. (2021) Unfolding refugee entrepreneurs’ opportunity-production process—Patterns and embeddedness. Journal of Business Venturing36(5): 106138.
39.
JiménezÁVMesoudiA (2019) Prestige-biased social learning: Current evidence and outstanding questions. Palgrave Communications5(1): 1–12.
40.
KierASMcMullenJS (2018) Entrepreneurial imaginativeness in new venture ideation. Academy of Management Journal61(6): 2265–2295.
41.
KimJWKingBG (2014) Seeing stars: Matthew effects and status bias in Major League Baseball umpiring. Management Science60(11): 2619–2644.
42.
KimPHLongestKCAldrichHE (2013) Can you lend me a hand? Task-role alignment of social support for aspiring business owners. Work and Occupations40(3): 213–249.
43.
KirtleyJO’MahonyS (2023) What is a pivot? Explaining when and how entrepreneurial firms decide to make strategic change and pivot. Strategic Management Journal44(1): 197–230.
44.
KlyverKHonigBSteffensP (2018) Social support timing and persistence in nascent entrepreneurship: exploring when instrumental and emotional support is most effective. Small Business Economics51: 709–734.
45.
KlyverKSchenkelMTNielsenMS (2020) Can’t always get what I want: Cultural expectations of emotional support in entrepreneurship. International Small Business Journal38(7): 677–690.
46.
LeatherbeeMKatilaR (2020) The lean startup method: Early-stage teams and hypothesis-based probing of business ideas. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal14(4): 570–593.
47.
LifchitsGAndersonAGoldsteinDG, et al. (2021) Success stories cause false beliefs about success. Judgment and Decision Making16(6): 1439–1463.
48.
MarkMM (1990) From program theory to tests of program theory. New Directions for Program Evaluation1990(47): 37–51.
49.
McCannBTVroomG (2015) Opportunity evaluation and changing beliefs during the nascent entrepreneurial process. International Small Business Journal33(6): 612–637.
50.
McElreathRBellAVEffersonC, et al. (2008) Beyond existence and aiming outside the laboratory: Estimating frequency-dependent and pay-off-biased social learning strategies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences363(1509): 3515–3528.
51.
McMullenJSDimovD (2013) Time and the entrepreneurial journey: The problems and promise of studying entrepreneurship as a process. Journal of Management Studies50(8): 1481–1512.
52.
McMullenJSShepherdDA (2006) Entrepreneurial action and the role of uncertainty in the theory of the entrepreneur. Academy of Management Review31(1): 132–152.
53.
MorganTJHRendellLHoppittWJE, et al. (2012) The evolutionary basis for human social learning. Proceedings of the Royal Society B279: 653–662.
54.
PackardMDClarkBBKleinPG (2017) Uncertainty types and transitions in the entrepreneurial process. Organization Science28(5): 840–856.
55.
PatelPCTsionasMOghaziP, et al. (2022). No entrepreneur steps in the same river twice: Limited learning advantage for serial entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Research142: 1038–1052.
56.
Perry-SmithJEMannucciPV (2017) From creativity to innovation: The social network drivers of the four phases of the idea journey. Academy of Management Review42(1): 53–79.
57.
PirlottAGMacKinnonDP (2016) Design approaches to experimental mediation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology66: 29–38.
58.
PriceMEVan VugtM (2014) The evolution of leader–follower reciprocity: The theory of service-for-prestige. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience8: 363.
59.
RamoglouS (2021) Knowable opportunities in an unknowable future? On the epistemological paradoxes of entrepreneurship theory. Journal of Business Venturing36: 106090.
60.
RamoglouSChandraYJinQ (2025) Opportunity search in the era of GenAI: Navigating uncertainty in an expanding universe of imaginable but unknowable futures. Journal of Management Studies.
61.
RatcliffNJHugenbergKShriverER, et al. (2011) The allure of status: High-status targets are privileged in face processing and memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin37(8): 1003–1015.
62.
RyanRM (1982) Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology43(3): 450.
63.
ShepherdDAGruberM (2021) The lean startup framework: Closing the academic–practitioner divide. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice45(5): 967–998.
64.
ShepherdD (2015) Party On! A call for entrepreneurship research that is more interactive, activity based, cognitively hot, compassionate, and prosocial. Journal of Business Venturing30(4): 489–507.
65.
ShepherdDASattariRPatzeltH (2022) A social model of opportunity development: Building and engaging communities of inquiry. Journal of Business Venturing37(1): 106033.
66.
StaniewskiMW (2016) The contribution of business experience and knowledge to successful entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Research69(11): 5147–5152.
67.
Stone-RomeroEFRosopaPJ (2011) Experimental tests of mediation models: Prospects, problems, and some solutions. Organizational Research Methods14(4): 631–646.
68.
TingleyDYamamotoTHiroseK, et al. (2014) Mediation: R package for causal mediation analysis. Journal of Statistical Software59: 1–38.
69.
TormalaZLPettyRE (2002) What doesn't kill me makes me stronger: The effects of resisting persuasion on attitude certainty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology83(6): 1298.
70.
TreffersTKlyverKNielsenMS, et al. (2019) Feel the commitment: From situational emotional information to venture goal commitment. International Small Business Journal37(3): 215–240.
71.
VilanovaLVitanovaI (2020) Unwrapping opportunity confidence: How do different types of feasibility beliefs affect venture emergence?Small Business Economics55(1): 215–236.
72.
VogelP (2017) From venture idea to venture opportunity. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice41(6): 943–971.
73.
Von RuedenCGurvenMKaplanH (2008) The multiple dimensions of male social status in an Amazonian society. Evolution and Human Behavior29(6): 402–415.
74.
WilliamsDWWoodMSMitchellJR, et al. (2019) Applying experimental methods to advance entrepreneurship research: On the need for and publication of experiments. Journal of Business Venturing34(2): 215–223.
75.
WoodLAKendalRLFlynnEG (2013) Whom do children copy? Model-based biases in social learning. Developmental Review33(4): 341–356.
76.
WoodMSMcKinleyW (2010) The production of entrepreneurial opportunity: A constructivist perspective. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal4(1): 66–84.
77.
ZagglMA (2017) Manipulation of explicit reputation in innovation and knowledge exchange communities: The example of referencing in science. Research Policy46(5): 970–983.
78.
ZagglMABlockJ (2019) Do small funding amounts lead to reverse herding? A field experiment in reward-based crowdfunding. Journal of Business Venturing Insights12: e00139.
79.
ZhangHZhouXNielsenMS, et al. (2023) The role of stereotype threat, anxiety, and emotional intelligence in women’s opportunity evaluation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice47(5): 1699–1730.
80.
ZhaoHSeibertSEHillsGE (2005) The mediating role of self-efficacy in the development of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Applied Psychology90: 1265–1272.
