This article presents a relational lifecycle model of the emergence of network capability in new ventures. Network capability is defined as a strategic ability learned in interaction with business partners. We focus on the foundational phases and processes of the emergence of this dynamic capability. The lifecycle model comprises three phases that evolve over time in tandem with the level of network engagement. The qualitative study identifies five tipping points or critical changes that move new ventures between the lifecycle phases. Using a sample of new ventures in a longitudinal action research design, the article demonstrates how new ventures emerge in network capability through increasingly complex and multilayered engagement processes with business partners. The relational lifecycle model contributes to the literature on how network capability emerges over time through the dynamics of interaction between business partners as new venture networks evolve and change.
AaboenLDuboisALindF (2011) Start-ups starting up–Firms looking for a network. The IMP Journal5(1): 42–58.
2.
AhujaGSodaGZaheerA (2012) The genesis and dynamics of organizational networks. Organization Science23(2): 434–448.
3.
AndersonJCHakansonHJohansonJ (1994) Dyadic business relationships within a business network context. Journal of Marketing58(4): 1–15.
4.
AutioEGeorgeGAlexyO (2011) International entrepreneurship and capability development – Qualitative evidence and future research directions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice35(1): 11–37.
5.
BeckinsaleMRamMTheodorakopoulosN (2011) ICT adoption and ebusiness development: Understanding ICT adoption amongst ethnic minority businesses. International Small Business Journal29(3): 193–219.
6.
BirleySWestheadP (1994) A taxonomy of business start-up reasons and their impact on firm growth and size. Journal of Business Venturing9(1): 7–31.
7.
BoamRSparrowP (Eds.) (1992) Designing and Achieving Competency: A Competency-Based Approach to Developing People and Organizations. London: McGraw-Hill Book Company Limited.
8.
BrinckmannJKimSM (2015) Why we plan: The impact of nascent entrepreneurs’ cognitive characteristics and human capital on business planning. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal9: 153–166.
9.
CapaldoA (2007) Network structure and innovation: The leveraging of a dual network as a distinctive relational capability. Strategic Management Journal28(6): 585–608.
10.
CarsonDCromieSMcGowanPet al. (1995) Marketing and Entrepreneurship in SMEs: An Innovative Approach. London: Prentice Hall.
11.
CarsonDJ (1985) The evolution of marketing in small firms. European Journal of Marketing19(5): 7–16.
12.
ChenWTanJ (2009) Understanding transnational entrepreneurship through a network lens: Theoretical and methodological considerations. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice33(5): 1079–1091.
13.
ChurchillNCLewisVL (1983) The five stages of small business growth. Harvard Business Review61(3): 30–50.
14.
CiabuschiFPernaASnehotaI (2012) Assembling resources when forming a new business. Journal of Business Research65(2): 220–229.
15.
CopeJ (2005) Towards a dynamic learning perspective of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice29(4): 373–397.
16.
CorsaroDRamosCHennebergSCet al. (2011) Actor network pictures and networking activities in business networks: An experimental study. Industrial Marketing Management40(6): 919–932.
17.
CovielloNE (2006) The network dynamics of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies37(5): 713731.
18.
CovielloNEJosephRM (2012) Creating major innovations with customers: Insights from small and young technology firms. Journal of Marketing76(6): 87–104.
19.
CovielloNEBrodieRJMunroHJ (2000) An investigation of marketing practice by firm size. Journal of Business Venturing15(5): 523–545.
20.
CovielloNEBrodieRJDanaherPJet al. (2002) How firms relate to their markets: An empirical examination of contemporary marketing practices. Journal of Marketing66(3): 33–46.
21.
CurrieGKerrinM (2004) The limits of a technological fix to knowledge management: Epistemological, political and cultural issues in the case of intranet implementation. Management Learning35(1): 9–29.
22.
DalleyJHamiltonB (2000) Knowledge, context and learning in the small business. International Small Business Journal18(3): 51–59.
23.
DavidssonP (2015) Entrepreneurial opportunities and the entrepreneurship nexus: A reconceptualization. Journal of Business Venturing30: 674–695.
24.
DavidssonPHonigB (2003) The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing18(3): 301–331.
25.
DeCarloJFLyonsPR (1979) A comparison of selected personality characteristics of minority and non-minority female entrepreneurs. Journal of Small Business Management17(1): 22–28.
26.
De CarolisDMSaparitoP (2006). Social capital, cognition, and entrepreneurial opportunities: A theoretical framework. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice30(1): 41–56.
DwyerFRSchurrPHOhS (1987) Developing buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing51(2): 11–27.
29.
DyerJHSinghH (1998) The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review23(4): 660–679.
30.
DyerJHGregersenHBChristensenC (2008) Entrepreneur behaviors, opportunity recognition, and the origins of innovative ventures. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal2(4): 317–338.
31.
EbbersJJ (2014) Networking behavior and contracting relationships among entrepreneurs in business incubators. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice38(5): 1159–1181.
32.
EdenCHuxhamC (1996) Action research for management research. British Journal of Management7(1): 75–86.
33.
EdwardsPSenguptaSTsaiCJ (2010) The context-dependent nature of small firms’ relations with support agencies: A three-sector study in the UK. International Small Business Journal28(6): 543–565.
34.
EisenhardtK (1989) Building theories from case studies. Academy of Management Review14(4): 532–550.
35.
EisenhardtKGraebnerM (2007) Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal50(1): 25–32.
36.
EisenhardtKMartinJ (2000) Dynamic capabilities: What are they?Strategic Management Journal21(10–11): 1105–1121.
37.
FordDGaddeLEHåkanssonHet al. (2003) Managing Business Relationships. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
38.
GaddeL-EHjelmgrenDSkarpF (2012) Interactive resource development in new business relationships. Journal of Business Research65(2): 210–217.
39.
GargiuloMBenassiM (2000) Trapped in your own net? Network cohesion, structural holes, and the adaptation of social capital. Organization Science11(2): 183–196.
40.
GilmoreACarsonDRocksS (2006) Networking in SMEs: Evaluating its contribution to marketing activity. International Business Review15(3): 278–293.
41.
GranovetterM (1983) The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory1: 201–233.
42.
GranovetterMS. (1973) The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology78(6): 1360–1380.
43.
GreveASalaffJW (2003) Social networks and entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice28(1): 1–22.
44.
HakanssonHSnehotaI (1995) Developing Relationships in Business Networks. London: Routledge.
45.
HåkanssonHFordDGaddeLEet al. (2009) Business in Networks. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
46.
HalinenAMedlinCJTörnroosJÅ (2012) Time and process in business network research. Industrial Marketing Management41(2): 215–223.
47.
HallenBLEisenhardtKM (2012) Catalyzing strategies and efficient tie formation: how entrepreneurial firms obtain investment ties. Academy of Management Journal55(1): 35–70.
48.
HannaVWalshK (2008) Interfirm cooperation among small manufacturing firms. International Small Business Journal26(3): 299–321.
49.
HarrisonRTLeitchCM (2005) Entrepreneurial Learning: Researching the Interface between Learning and the Entrepreneurial Context. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice29(4): 351–371.
HelfatCEPeterafMA (2015) Managerial cognitive capabilities and the microfoundations of dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal36(6): 831–850.
52.
HiteJM (2003) Patterns of multidimensionality among embedded network ties: A typology of relational embeddedness in emerging entrepreneurial firms. Strategic Organization1(1): 9–49.
53.
HiteJM (2005) Evolutionary processes and paths of relationally embedded network ties in emerging entrepreneurial firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice29(1): 113–144.
54.
HiteJMHesterlyWS (2001) The evolution of firm networks: from emergence to early growth of the firm. Strategic Management Journal22(3): 275–286.
55.
HoangHAntoncicB (2003) Network-based research in entrepreneurship: A critical review. Journal of Business Venturing18(2): 165–187.
56.
HoangHYiA (2015) Network-based research in entrepreneurship: A decade in review. Foundations and Trends® in Entrepreneurship11(1): 1–54.
57.
HolmenEPedersenAC (2003) Strategizing through analyzing and influencing the network horizon. Industrial Marketing Management32(5): 409–418.
58.
HuxhamCVangenS (2000) Leadership in the shaping and implementation of collaboration agendas: How things happen in a (not quite) joined-up world. Academy of Management Journal43(6): 1159–1175.
59.
JackSMoultSAndersonARet al. (2010) An entrepreneurial network change evolving: Patterns of change. International Small Business Journal28(4): 315–337.
60.
JohannissonB (1988) Business formation–A network approach. Scandinavian Journal of Management4(3-4): 83–99.
61.
JohansonJVahlneJ-E (2011) Markets as networks: Implications for strategy-making. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science39(4): 484–491.
62.
KaplanRS (1998) Innovation action research: Creating new management theory and practice. Journal of Management Accounting Research10: 89–118.
63.
KilduffMTsaiW (2003) Social Networks and Organizations. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
64.
La RoccaASnehotaI (2014) Relating in business networks: Innovation in Practice. Industrial Marketing Management43(3): 441–447.
65.
La RoccaAFordDSnehotaI (2013) Initial relationship development in new business ventures. Industrial Marketing Management42(7): 1025–1032.
66.
LangleyA (1999) Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review24(4): 691–710.
67.
LarsonALStarrJA (1993) A network model of organization formation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice17(2): 5–15.
68.
LechnerCDowlingM (2003) Firm networks: External relationships as sources for the growth and competitiveness of entrepreneurial firms. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development15(1): 1–26.
69.
LechnerCDowlingMWelpeI (2006) Firm networks and firm development: The role of the relational mix. Journal of Business Venturing21(4): 514–540.
70.
LeeDDAhnJH (2005) Rewarding knowledge sharing under measurement inaccuracy. Knowledge Management Research & Practice3(4): 229–243.
71.
LeeDYTsangEWK (2001) The effects of entrepreneurial personality, background and network activities on venture growth. Journal of Management Studies38(4): 583–602.
72.
LeitchCM (2007) An action research approach to entrepreneurship. In: NeergaardHUlhøiJP(eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods in Entrepreneurship. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 144–168.
73.
LeitchCMMcMullanCHarrisonRT (2009) Leadership development in SMEs: an action learning approach. Action Learning: Research and Practice6(3): 243–263.
74.
LorenzoniGLippariniA (1999) The leveraging of interfirm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal20(4): 317–338.
75.
McEvilyBMarcusA (2005) Embedded ties and the acquisition of competitive capabilities. Strategic Management Journal26(11): 1033–1055.
76.
McGrathHO’TooleT (2016) Using action research and action learning for network capability development. Action Learning Research and Practice13(2): 118–138.
77.
McMullenJSShepherdDA (2006) Entrepreneurial action and the role of uncertainty in the theory of the entrepreneur. Academy of Management Review31(1): 132–152.
78.
MarchJGSimonHA (1958) Organizations. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
79.
MillerDFriesenPH (1980) Momentum and revolution in organizational adaptation. Academy of Management Journal23(4): 591–614.
80.
MillerDFriesenPH (1982) Innovation in conservative and entrepreneurial firms: Two models of strategic momentum. Strategic Management Journal3(1): 1–25.
81.
MinerASBassofPMoormanC (2001) Organizational improvisation and learning: A field study. Administrative Science Quarterly46(2): 304–337.
82.
MitregaMForkmannSRamosCet al. (2012) Networking capability in business relationships – Concept and scale development. Industrial Marketing Management41(5): 739–751.
83.
MohrLB (1982) Explaining Organizational Behavior. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
MontealegreR (2002) A process model of capability development: Lessons from the electronic commerce strategy at Bolsa de Valores de Guayaquil. Organization Science13(5): 514–531.
86.
NewbertSLTornikoskiETQuigleyNR (2013) Exploring the evolution of supporter networks in the creation of new organisations. Journal of Business Venturing28(2): 281–298.
87.
ObstfeldD (2005) Social networks, and the Tertius Iungens orientation and involvement in innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly50(1): 100–130.
88.
PartanenJChettySKRajalaA (2014) Innovation types and network relationships. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice38(5): 1027–1055.
89.
PettigrewAM (1997) What is a processual analysis?Scandinavian Journal of Management13(4): 337–348.
90.
ReasonP (2006) Choice and quality in action research practice. Journal of Management Inquiry15(2): 187–204.
91.
ReasonPBradburyH (2001) Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice. London: SAGE.
92.
RingPSVan de VenAH (1994) Developmental processes of cooperative inter-organizational relationships. Academy of Management Review19(1): 90–118.
93.
RitterTWilkinsonIFJohnstonWJ (2002) Measuring network competence: Some international evidence. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing17(2–3): 119–138.
94.
RiegeA (2005) Three-dozen knowledge sharing barriers managers must consider. Journal of Knowledge Management9(3): 18–35.
95.
RitterTGemündenHG (2003) Network competence: its impact on innovation success and its antecedentsJournal of Business Research56(9): 745–755.
96.
RobsonC (2002) Real World Research. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
97.
SasovovaZMehraABorgattiSPet al. (2010) Network churn: The effects of self-monitoring personality on brokerage dynamics. Administrative Science Quarterly55(4): 639–670.
98.
SchillebeeckxSJDChaturvediSGeorgeG, et al.et al (2016) What do I want? The effects of individual aspiration and relational capability on collaboration preferences. Strategic Management Journal37(7): 1493–1506.
99.
SchurrPH (2007) Buyer-Seller relationship development episodes: Theories and methods. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing22(3): 161–170.
100.
SchurrPHHedaaLGeersbroJ (2008) Interaction episodes as engines of relationship change. Journal of Business Research61(8): 877–884.
101.
ScottMBruceR (1987) Five stages of growth in small business. Long Range Planning20(3): 45–52.
102.
SemrauTWernerA (2014) How exactly do network relationships pay off? The effects of network size and relationship quality on access to start-up resources. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice38(3): 501–525.
103.
ShawE (2006) Small Firm Networking. International Small Business Journal24(1): 5–29.
104.
ShepherdDA (2015) Party on! A call for entrepreneurship research that is more interactive, activity based, cognitively hot, compassionate, and prosocial. Journal of Business Venturing30(4): 489–507.
105.
Slotte-KockSCovielloN (2010) Entrepreneurship research on network processes: A review and ways forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice34(1): 33–57.
106.
StraussACorbinJ (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. London: SAGE.
107.
StraussAL (1987) Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
108.
SunPYScottJL (2005) An investigation of barriers of knowledge transfer. Journal of Knowledge Management9(2): 75–90.
109.
SusmanGIEveredRD (1978) An assessment of the scientific merits of action research. Administrative Science Quarterly23: 582–603.
110.
TangJKacmarKMMBusenitzL (2012) Entrepreneurial alertness in the pursuit of new opportunities. Journal of Business Venturing27(1): 77–94.
UzziB (1997) Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly42(1): 35–67.
113.
ViioPGronroosC (2016) How buyer-seller relationship orientation affects adaptation of sales processes to the buying process. Industrial Marketing Management52(1): 37–46.
114.
VissaB (2011) A matching theory of entrepreneurs’ tie formation intentions and initiation of economic exchange. Academy of Management Journal54(1): 137–158.
115.
VissaB (2012) Agency in action: Entrepreneurs’ networking style and initiation of economic exchange. Organization Science23(2): 492–510.
116.
WalterAAuerMRitterT (2006) Entrepreneurship and strategic alliances: The impact of network capabilities and entrepreneurial orientation on university spin-off performance. Journal of Business Venturing21(4): 541–567.
117.
WangC (2004) The influence of ethical and self-interest concerns on knowledge sharing intentions among managers: An empirical study. International Journal of Management21(3): 370–381.
WinterSG (2012) Capabilities: Their origins and ancestry. Journal of Management Studies49(8): 1402–1406.
120.
ZahraSASapienzaHJDavidssonP (2006) Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: A review, model and research agenda. Journal of Management Studies43(4): 917–955.
121.
ZahraSA (2010) Harvesting family firms’ organizational social capital: A relational perspective. Journal of Management Studies47(2): 345–366.
122.
ZaneLJDeCarolisM (2016) Social networks and the acquisition of resources by technology-based new ventures. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship23(3): 203–221.
123.
ZolloMWinterSG (2002) Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science13(3): 339–351.
