This article examines the impact of open innovation (OI) practices on the innovation activity of low-tech small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Different external knowledge sources are considered, and the ability of SMEs to acquire and integrate external knowledge into their organizational boundaries for innovation purposes is assessed. The research draws on a sample of 191 Italian winemakers. The results show that SMEs with higher propensity to access and use external knowledge sources show a greater ability to innovate and that their absorptive capacity impacts the use of external sources. Several implications for theory and practice are drawn, underlining a number of suggestions for future research.
AbouzeedanAKlofstenMHednerT (2013) Internetization management as a facilitator for managing innovation in high-technology smaller firms. Global Business Review14(1): 121–136.
2.
BianchiMOrtoSCFrattiniF. (2010) Enabling open innovation in small- and medium-sized enterprises: How to find alternative applications for your technologies. R&D Management40(4): 414–430.
3.
BraunAMuellerEAdelhelmS. (2012) Knowledge flow at the fuzzy front-end of inter-firm R&D collaborations–insights into SMEs in the pharmaceutical industry. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management15(1): 29–46.
4.
BrunswickerSVanhaverbekeW (2014) Open innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs): External knowledge sourcing strategies and internal organizational facilitators. Journal of Small and Business Management53(4): 1241–1263.
5.
CapitanioFCoppolaAPascucciS (2010) Product and process innovation in the Italian food industry. Agribusiness: An International Journal26: 503–518.
6.
CassimanBValentiniG (2015) Open innovation: Are inbound and outbound knowledge flows really complementary?Strategic Management Journal37(6): 1034–1046.
7.
CassimanBVeugelersR (2006) In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: Internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition. Management Science52(1): 68–82.
8.
CastellanoSKhelladiI (2016) How French wine producers use open innovation to gain and manage their legitimacy. Journal of Knowledge Economy7(1): 155–171.
9.
CeciFMasciarelliFPoledriniS (2014) Innovation in a bonding social capital context: The case of CDO Marche Sud. In: DRUID society conference 2014, CBS, Copenhagen, 16–18June. Available at: http://druid8.sit.aau.dk/acc_papers/3typhysulepsup8kxve7l026kgn6.pdf (accessed 15 April 2016).
10.
ChenJChenJF (2006) Open innovation system and technological innovation resource allocation. Research Management5(1): 1–6.
11.
ChesbroughH (2003) Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
12.
ChesbroughH (2006) Open innovation: A new paradigm for understanding industrial Innovation. In: ChesbroughHVanhaverbekeWWestJ (eds) Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm. London: Oxford University Press, pp.1–27.
13.
ChesbroughHAppleyardM (2007) Open innovation and strategy. California Management Review50(1): 57–76.
14.
ChesbroughHVanhaverbekeWWestJ (2006) Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm. London: Oxford University Press.
15.
ChiricoFNordqvistM (2010) Dynamic capabilities and transgenerational value creation in family firms: The role of organizational culture. International Small Business Journal28(5): 487–504.
16.
ChristensenJFOlesonMHKjærJS (2005) The industrial dynamics of open innovation: Evidence from the transformation of consumer electronics. Research Policy34(10): 1533–1549.
17.
CohenWLevinthalD (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly35(1): 128–152.
18.
ColomboMGLaursenKMagnussonM. (2012) Introduction: Small business and networked innovation: Organizational and managerial challenges. Journal of Small Business Management50(2): 181–190.
DoloreuxDLord-TarteE (2013) The organisation of innovation in the wine industry: Open innovation, external sources of knowledge and proximity. European Journal of Innovation Management16(2): 171–189.
24.
DriesLPascucciSTörökÁ. (2014) Keeping your secrets public? Open versus closed innovation processes in the Hungarian wine sector. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review17(1): 147–162.
25.
EnzingCMPascucciSJanszen. (2011) Role of open innovation in the short- and long-term market success of new products: Evidence from the Dutch food and beverages industry. Journal on Chain and Network Science11(3): 235–250.
26.
FilieriR (2013) Consumer co-creation and new product development: A case study in the food industry. Marketing Intelligence & Planning31(1): 40–53.
27.
FreelMRobsonPJ (2016) Appropriation strategies and open innovation in SMEs. International Small Business Journal. Epub ahead of print 26June. DOI: 10.1177/0266242616654957.
28.
GambardellaAGiarratanaMS (2013) General technological capabilities, product market fragmentation and markets for technology. Research Policy42(2): 315–325.
29.
GarciaRCalantoneR (2002) A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: A literature review. Journal of Product Innovation Management19(2): 110–132.
30.
GassmannO (2006) Opening up the innovation process: Towards an agenda. R&D Management36(3): 223–226.
31.
GassmannOEnkelEChesbroughHW (2010) The future of open innovation. R&D Management40(3): 213–221.
32.
Global Wine Monitor (2013) State of the vitiviniculture world market. Available at: http://www.winemonitor.it/en/ (accessed 15 December 2015).
33.
HairJFAndersonRETathamRL (1989) Multivariate Data Analysis. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
34.
HemertPNijkampPMasurelE (2013) From innovation to commercialization through networks and agglomerations: Analysis of sources of innovation, innovation capabilities and performance of Dutch SMEs. The Annals of Regional Science50(2): 425–452.
35.
HienerthC (2006) The commercialization of user innovations: The development of the rodeo kayak industry. R&D Management36(3): 273–294.
36.
HugginsRJohnstonASteffensonR (2008) Universities, knowledge networks and regional policy. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society1: 321–340.
37.
HuizinghE (2010) Open innovation: State of the art and future perspectives. Technovation31(1): 2–9.
JackaSDrakopoulouDSAndersonAR (2008) Change and the development of entrepreneurial networks over time: A processual perspective. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development: An International Journal20(2): 125–159.
40.
KaiserHF (1974) An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika39(1): 31–36.
41.
KamalEM (2013) Absorptive capacity in construction SMEs: A literature synthesis. World Applied Sciences Journal21(8): 1122–1127.
42.
KarantininisKSauerJFurtanWH (2010) Innovation and integration in the agri-food industry. Food Policy35(2): 112–120.
43.
LanePJKokaBRPathakS (2006) The Reification of Absorptive Capacity: A Critical Review and Rejuvenation of the Construct. The Academy of Management Review31(4): 833–863.
44.
LasagniA (2012) How can external relationships enhance innovation in SMEs? New evidence for Europe. Journal of Small Business Management50(2): 310–339.
45.
LaursenKSalterA (2006) Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal27(2): 131–150.
46.
LeeSParkGYoonB. (2010) Open innovation in SMEs – An intermediated network model. Research Policy39(2): 290–300.
47.
LiWYMeiQGuGF (2011) SME open innovation research based on technology innovation service system. Technology Progress and Policy28: 5–8.
48.
LimKChesbroughHRuanY (2010) Open innovation and patterns of R&D competition. International Journal of Technology Management52(3–4): 295–321.
49.
MattiacciANosiCZanniL (2005) How the increasing competition is reshaping Tuscan wineries: The cases of Chianti Classico and Brunello di Montalcino. Paper presented at the 2nd international wine marketing symposium, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park, CA, 8–9 July.
50.
NdouVVecchioPDPassianteG. (2012) Toward a sectoral system of innovation for local wine sector. International Journal of Business and Globalisation8(1): 81–94.
OakeyRP (2013) Open innovation and its relevance to industrial research and development: The case of high-technology small firms. International Small Business Journal31(3): 319–336.
53.
OECD-EUROSTAT (1997) The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities: Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Data. Oslo Manual, Paris: OECD.
54.
ParidaVWesterbergMFrishammarJ (2012) Inbound open innovation activities in high-tech SMEs: The impact on innovation performance. Journal of Small Business Management50(2): 283–309.
55.
PavittK (1990) The strategic management of technology. California Management Review28: 17–24.
56.
PittawayLRobertsonMMunirK. (2004) Networking and innovation: A systematic review of the evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews5–6(3–4): 137–168.
57.
RothaermelFTAlexandreMT (2009) Ambidexterity in technology sourcing: The moderating role of absorptive capacity. Management Science20(4): 759–780.
58.
RouzetESeguinG (2004) Il marketing del vino. Il mercato. Le strategie commerciali. La distribuzione. Bologna: Edagricole – Il Sole 24 ORE.
59.
SigmundSSemrauTWegnerD (2015) Networking ability and the financial performance of new ventures: Moderating effects of venture size, institutional environment, and their interaction. Journal of Small Business Management53(1): 266–283.
60.
SpithovenAClarysseBKnockaertM (2010) Building absorptive capacity to organize inbound open innovation in traditional industries. Technovation30(2): 130–141.
TemelSMentionALTorkkeliM (2013) The impact of cooperation on firms’ innovation propensity in emerging economies. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation8(1): 54–64.
63.
TheyelN (2013) Extending open innovation throughout the value chain by small and medium-sized manufacturers. International Small Business Journal31(3): 256–274.
64.
TodorovaGDurisinB (2007) Absorptive capacity: Valuing a reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review32(3): 774–786.
65.
Van de VrandeVDe JongJPJVanhaverbekeW. (2009) Open innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and management challenges. Technovation29(6–7): 423–437.
66.
VanhaverbekeWVermeerschDe ZutterS (2012) Open innovation in SMEs: How can small companies and start-ups benefit from open innovation strategies? Research report, Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School, Gent.
67.
VolberdaHWFossNJLylesMA (2010) Absorbing the concept of absorptive capacity: How to realize its potential in the organization field. Organization Science21: 931–951.
68.
Von HippelE (2005) Democratizing Innovation. Cambridge: MIT Press.
69.
WynarczykPPiperopoulosPMcAdamM (2013) Open innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises: An overview. International Small Business Journal31(3): 240–255.
70.
ZahraSAGeorgeG (2002) Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review27(2): 185–203.
71.
ZanniLDevigiliLCordero di MontezemoloS (2010) Managing succession in family business: Successful lessons from long lasting wineries in Tuscany. In: FaraoniMSantiniC (eds) The Wine Business in California and Tuscany: A Cross-Country Analysis. Milan: McGraw-Hill, pp.63–92.
72.
ZhangJChenL (2014) The review of SMEs open innovation performance. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management4: 716–720.
