This article develops a co-citation analysis covering the period 1991–2014 outlining the collective logic of authors conducting studies of entrepreneurship education. The core themes, major contributions and topological features characterising their relationships are identified. The findings indicate that the field has a polycentric structure with five core themes of which entrepreneurial intentions emerges as the most influential while the entrepreneurial learning and evaluation themes have emerged in recent years. These two core themes appear to foster changes within the current structure with the introduction of new theoretical inputs and the formation of new theoretical hubs. We argue that future research should attempt to organise focal themes into a theoretical framework that allows a comprehensive picture of entrepreneurship education.
AcedoFJCasillasJC (2005) Current paradigms in the international management field: An author co-citation analysis. International Business Review14(5): 619–639.
2.
AcedoFJBarrosoCGalanJL (2006) The resource-based theory: Dissemination and main trends. Strategic Management Journal27(7): 621–636.
3.
AjzenIFishbeinM (2005) The influence of attitudes on behavior. In: AlbarracínDJohnsonBTZannaMP (eds) The Handbook of Attitudes. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp.173–221.
4.
AthaydeR (2009) Measuring enterprise potential in young people. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice33(2): 481–500.
5.
BaronRA (2006) Opportunity recognition as pattern recognition: How entrepreneurs ‘connect the dots’ to identify new business opportunities. The Academy of Management Perspectives20(1): 104–119.
6.
BéchardJPGrégoireD (2005) Entrepreneurship education research revisited: The case of higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education4(1): 22–43.
7.
BlockJHHoogerheideLThurikR (2011) Education and entrepreneurial choice: An instrumental variables analysis. International Small Business Journal31(1): 23–33.
8.
BoyackKWKlavansR (2010) Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately?Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology61(12): 2389–2404.
9.
BraamRRMoedHFVan RaanAF (1991) Mapping of science by combined co-citation and word analysis. I. Structural aspects. Journal of the American Society for Information Science42(4): 233–251.
10.
BrushC (2003) Doctoral education in the field of entrepreneurship. Journal of Management29(3): 309–331.
11.
BrushCGDuhaimeIMGartnerWBStewartAKatzJAHittMA… VenkataramanS (2003) Doctoral education in the field of entrepreneurship. Journal of Management29(3): 309–331.
12.
BusenitzLWPlummerLAKlotzAC. (2014) Entrepreneurship research (1985–2009) and the emergence of opportunities. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice38(5): 981–1000.
13.
ByrneJFayolleAToutainO (2014) Entrepreneurship education: What we know and what we need to know. In: ChellEKaratas-özkanM (eds) Handbook of Research in Entrepreneurship and Small Business. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp.261–288.
14.
CallonMCourtialJPPenanH (1993) La scientométrie, vol. 2727. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
15.
ChenC (2006) CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for information Science and Technology57(3): 359–377.
16.
ChenCCarrL (1999) Trailblazing the literature of hypertext: Author co-citation analysis (1989–1998). In: Proceedings of the tenth ACM conference on hypertext and hypermedia: returning to our diverse roots: returning to our diverse roots, Darmstadt, 21–25 February, pp.51–60. New York: ACM.
17.
ChenCCGreenePGCrickA (1998) Does entrepreneurial self-efficacy distinguish entrepreneurs from managers?Journal of Business Venturing13(4): 295–316.
18.
CoboMJLópez-HerreraAGHerrera-ViedmaE. (2011a) An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the fuzzy sets theory field. Journal of Informetrics5(1): 146–166.
19.
CoboMJLópez-HerreraAGHerrera-ViedmaE. (2011b) Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology62(7): 1382–1402.
20.
CoboMJLópez-HerreraAGHerrera-ViedmaE. (2012) SciMAT: A new science mapping analysis software tool. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology63(8): 1609–1630.
21.
CopeJ (2003) Entrepreneurial learning and critical reflection discontinuous events as triggers for ‘higher-level’ learning. Management Learning34(4): 429–450.
22.
CopeJ (2005) Toward a dynamic learning perspective of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice29: 373–397.
23.
CopeJ (2011) Entrepreneurial learning from failure: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Journal of Business Venturing26(6): 604–623.
24.
CorneliusBLandströmHPerssonO (2006) Entrepreneurial studies: The dynamic research front of a developing social science. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice30(3): 375–398.
25.
CraneD (1972) Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
26.
CrantJM (1996) The proactive personality scale as a predictor of entrepreneurial intentions. Management29(3): 62–74.
27.
CulnanMJ (1986) The intellectual development of management information systems, 1972–1982: A co-citation analysis. Management Science32(2): 156–172.
28.
CulnanMJ (1987) Mapping the intellectual structure of MIS, 1980–1985: A co-citation analysis. Mis Quarterly11: 341–353.
29.
De ClercqDAreniusP (2006) The role of knowledge in business start-up activity. International Small Business Journal24(4): 339–358.
30.
DeTienneDRChandlerGN (2004) Opportunity identification and its role in the entrepreneurial classroom: A pedagogical approach and empirical test. Academy of Management Learning & Education3(3): 242–257.
31.
Di GuardoMCGalvagnoM (2010) Information systems and service research: A co-citation analysis. In: D’AtriADe MarcoMBracciniAM. (eds) Management of the Interconnected World. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag, pp.437–444.
32.
Di GuardoMCHarriganKR (2012) Mapping research on strategic alliances and innovation: A co-citation analysis. The Journal of Technology Transfer37(6): 789–811.
33.
Di GuardoMCGalvagnoMCabidduF (2012) Analysing the intellectual structure of e-service research. International Journal of E-Services and Mobile Applications4(2): 19–36.
34.
Di StefanoGGambardellaAVeronaG (2012) Technology push and demand pull perspectives in innovation studies: Current findings and future research directions. Research Policy41(8): 1283–1295.
35.
Díaz-CaseroCHernández-MogollónRRoldánJL (2011) A structural model of the antecedents to entrepreneurial capacity. International Small Business Journal30(8): 850–872.
36.
EdelmanLFManolovaTSBrushCG (2008) Entrepreneurship education: Correspondence between practices of nascent entrepreneurs and textbook prescriptions for success. Academy of Management Learning & Education7(1): 56–70.
37.
FayolleA (2013) Personal views on the future of entrepreneurship education. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development25(7–8): 692–701.
38.
FayolleAGaillyB (2015) The impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial attitudes and intention: Hysteresis and persistence. Journal of Small Business Management53(1): 75–93.
39.
FayolleALiñánF (2014) The future of research on entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Research67(5): 663–666.
40.
FayolleAVerzatCWapshottR (2014) In quest of legitimacy: The theoretical and methodological foundations of entrepreneurship education research. Targeting, connecting and reflecting as key orientations for future research. International of Small Business Journal34(7): 895–904.
41.
FietJO (2001) The theoretical side of teaching entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing16(1): 1–24.
42.
GarfieldE (1972) Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science178: 471–479.
43.
GarfieldE (1979) Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool?Scientometrics1(4): 359–375.
44.
GartnerWBVesperKH (1994) Experiments in entrepreneurship education: Successes and failures. Journal of business Venturing9(3): 179–187.
45.
GibbA (2002) In pursuit of a new ‘enterprise’ and ‘entrepreneurship’ paradigm for learning: Creative destruction, new values, new ways of doing things and new combinations of knowledge. International Journal of Management Reviews4(3): 233–269.
46.
GlänzelW (2001) National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations. Scientometrics51(1): 69–115.
47.
GlänzelW (2012) The role of core documents in bibliometric network analysis and their relation with h-type indices. Scientometrics93(1): 113–123.
48.
GrégoireDANoelMXDéryR. (2006) Is there conceptual convergence in entrepreneurship research? A co-citation analysis of Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 1981–2004. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice30(3): 333–373.
49.
HarrisonRTLeitchCM (2005) Entrepreneurial learning: Researching the interface between learning and the entrepreneurial context. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice29(4): 351–371.
50.
HicksD (1987) Limitations of co-citation analysis as a tool for science policy. Social Studies of Science17(2): 295–316.
51.
HmieleskiKMCorbettAC (2006) Proclivity for improvisation as a predictor of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Small Business Management44(1): 45–63.
52.
HolcombTRIrelandRDHolmesRMJr. (2009) Architecture of entrepreneurial learning: Exploring the link among heuristics, knowledge, and action. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice33(1): 167–192.
53.
HonigB (2004) Entrepreneurship education: Toward a model of contingency-based business planning. Academy of Management Learning & Education3(3): 258–273.
54.
HoodJNYoungJE (1993) Entrepreneurship’s requisite areas of development: A survey of top executives in successful entrepreneurial firms. Journal of Business Venturing8(2): 115–135.
55.
HuangMHChangYW (2011) A study of interdisciplinarity in information science: Using direct citation and co-authorship analysis. Journal of Information Science37(4): 369–378.
56.
KatzJA (2003) The chronology and intellectual trajectory of American entrepreneurship education. Journal of Business Venturing18(2): 283–300.
57.
KatzJA (2008) Fully mature but not fully legitimate: A different perspective on the state of entrepreneurship education. Journal of Small Business Management46(4): 550–566.
58.
KesslerMM (1963) Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation14(1): 10–25.
59.
KingJ (1987) A review of bibliometric and other science indicators and their role in research evaluation. Journal of Information Science13(5): 261–276.
60.
KourilskyMLWalstadWB (1998) Entrepreneurship and female youth: Knowledge, attitudes, gender differences, and educational practices. Journal of Business Venturing13(1): 77–88.
61.
KruegerNFReillyMDCarsrudAL (2000) Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing15(5-6): 411–432.
62.
KuratkoDF (2005) The emergence of entrepreneurship education: Development, trends, and challenges. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice29(5): 577–598.
63.
Levine-ClarkMGilE (2009) A comparative analysis of social sciences citation tools. Online Information Review33(5): 986–996.
64.
LiñánFRodríguez-CohardJCRueda-CantucheJM (2011) Factors affecting entrepreneurial intention levels: A role for education. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal7(2): 195–218.
65.
McCainKW (1990) Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview. Journal of the American Society for Information Science41(6): 433–443.
66.
McGeeJEPetersonMMuellerSL. (2009) Entrepreneurial self-efficacy: Refining the measure. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice33(4): 965–988.
67.
MartinBCMcNallyJJKayMJ (2013) Examining the formation of human capital in entrepreneurship: A meta-analysis of entrepreneurship education outcomes. Journal of Business Venturing28(2): 211–224.
68.
MatlayH (2006) Researching entrepreneurship and education: Part 2: What is entrepreneurship education and does it matter?Education + Training48(8–9): 704–718.
MatlayH (2011) Special issue: Entrepreneurship education. Education + Training53(8–9): 659.
71.
MatlayH (2012) Special issue: Theory and practice in entrepreneurship education. Education + Training54(8–9): 639.
72.
MeyerMLibaersDThijsB. (2014) Origin and emergence of entrepreneurship as a research field. Scientometrics98(1): 473–485.
73.
NabiGFayolleALiñánF. (2013) The impact of entrepreneurship education on graduate entrepreneurship: A systematic review of the literature.
74.
NeckHMGreenePG (2011) Entrepreneurship education: Known worlds and new frontiers. Journal of Small Business Management49(1): 55–70.
75.
NerurSPRasheedAANatarajanV (2008) The intellectual structure of the strategic management field: An author co-citation analysis. Strategic Management Journal29(3): 319–336.
76.
OosterbeekHVan PraagMIjsselsteinA (2010) The impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurship skills and motivation. European Economic Review54(3): 442–454.
77.
ParkerSC (2006) Learning about the unknown: How fast do entrepreneurs adjust their beliefs?Journal of Business Venturing21(1): 1–26.
78.
PerssonO (2010) Identifying research themes with weighted direct citation links. Journal of Informetrics4(3): 415–422.
79.
PeterafMDi StefanoGVeronaG (2013) The elephant in the room of dynamic capabilities: Bringing two diverging conversations together. Strategic Management Journal34: 1389–1410.
80.
PetermanNEKennedyJ (2003) Enterprise education: Influencing students’ perceptions of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice28: 129–144.
81.
PilkingtonAMeredithJ (2009) The evolution of the intellectual structure of operations management – 1980–2006: A citation/co-citation analysis. Journal of Operations Management27(3): 185–202.
82.
PittawayLCopeJ (2007a) Entrepreneurship education: A systematic review of the evidence. International Small Business Journal25(5): 479–510.
83.
PittawayLCopeJ (2007b) Simulating entrepreneurial learning: Integrating experiential and collaborative approaches to learning. Management Learning38(2): 211–233.
84.
PittawayLPenalunaA (2013) Introduction to special issue. American Journal of Entrepreneurship6(2): 0–0.
85.
PittawayLRodriguez-FalconEAiyegbayoO. (2010) The role of entrepreneurship clubs and societies in entrepreneurial learning. International Small Business Journal29(1): 37–57.
86.
PolitisD (2005) The process of entrepreneurial learning: A conceptual framework. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice29(4): 399–424.
87.
QuirinACordónOSantamaríaJ. (2008) A new variant of the pathfinder algorithm to generate large visual science maps in cubic time. Information Processing & Management44(4): 1611–1623.
88.
RaeD (2006) Entrepreneurial learning: A conceptual framework for technology-based enterprise. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management18(1): 39–56.
89.
Ramos-RodríguezARRuíz-NavarroJ (2004) Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research: A bibliometric study of the Strategic Management Journal, 1980–2000. Strategic Management Journal25(10): 981–1004.
RavasiDTuratiC (2005) Exploring entrepreneurial learning: A comparative study of technology development projects. Journal of Business Venturing20(1): 137–164.
92.
ReaderDWatkinsD (2006) The social and collaborative nature of entrepreneurship scholarship: A co-citation and perceptual analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice30(3): 417–441.
93.
RobinsonPBSextonEA (1994) The effect of education and experience on self-employment success. Journal of Business Venturing9(2): 141–156.
94.
RowlandsI (1999) Patterns of author cocitation in information policy: Evidence of social, collaborative and cognitive structure. Scientometrics44(3): 533–546.
95.
SchildtHAZahraSASillanpääA (2006) Scholarly communities in entrepreneurship research: A co-citation analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice30(3): 399–415.
96.
SchvaneveldtRWDearholtDWDursoFT (1988) Graph theoretic foundations of pathfinder networks. Computers & Mathematics with Applications15(4): 337–345.
97.
SchvaneveldtRWDursoFTDearholtDW (1989) Network structures in proximity data. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation24: 249–284.
98.
ShepherdDA (2004) Educating entrepreneurship students about emotion and learning from failure. Academy of Management Learning & Education3(3): 274–287.
99.
SmallH (1973) Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for information Science24(4): 265–269.
100.
SmallH (1977) A co-citation model of a scientific specialty: A longitudinal study of collagen research. Social Studies of Science7: 139–166.
101.
SmallH (2003) Paradigms, citations, and maps of science: A personal history. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology54: 394–399.
102.
SmallH (2010) Maps of science as interdisciplinary discourse: Co-citation contexts and the role of analogy. Scientometrics83(3): 835–849.
103.
SmallHGriffithBC (1974) The structure of scientific literatures I: Identifying and graphing specialties. Science Studies4: 17–40.
SouitarisVZerbinatiSAl-LahamA (2007) Do entrepreneurship programmes raise entrepreneurial intention of science and engineering students? The effect of learning, inspiration and resources. Journal of Business Venturing22(4): 566–591.
106.
SternDI (2014) High-ranked social science journal articles can be identified from early citation information. PLoS ONE9(11): e112520.
107.
TraceyPPhillipsN (2007) The distinctive challenge of educating social entrepreneurs: A postscript and rejoinder to the special issue on entrepreneurship education. Academy of Management Learning & Education6(2): 264–271.
108.
VesperKHGartnerWB (1997) Measuring progress in entrepreneurship education. Journal of Business Venturing12(5): 403–421.
109.
Von GraevenitzGHarhoffDWeberR (2010) The effects of entrepreneurship education. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization76(1): 90–112.
110.
WhiteHD (2003) Pathfinder networks and author cocitation analysis: A remapping of paradigmatic information scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology54(5): 423–434.
111.
WhiteHDGriffithBC (1981) Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science32(3): 163–171.
112.
WhiteHDMcCainKW (1998) Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science49(4): 327–355.
WilsonFKickulJMarlinoD (2007) Gender, entrepreneurial self-efficacy, and entrepreneurial career intentions: Implications for entrepreneurship education. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice31(3): 387–406.
115.
ZhaoDStrotmannA (2008a) Evolution of research activities and intellectual influences in information science 1996–2005: Introducing author bibliographic-coupling analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology59(13): 2070–2086.
116.
ZhaoDStrotmannA (2008b) Information science during the first decade of the web: An enriched author cocitation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology59(6): 916–937.
117.
ZhaoDStrotmannA (2014) The knowledge base and research front of information science 2006–2010: An author cocitation and bibliographic coupling analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology65(5): 995–1006.
