This article examines the relationship between long-term orientation, family involvement in the top management team (TMT), and family firm performance. On the basis of agency and stewardship theory, we propose that the inclusion of family members in the TMT only enhances firm performance if it induces a long-term orientation among management. An empirical analysis involving 201 privately owned family firms from Germany supports our theory that a long-term orientation helps align family and organizational goals. As such, it represents an important mediator that links family involvement in the TMT to performance.
AllenMJYenWM (1979) Introduction to Measurement Theory. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
2.
AndersonRCReebDM (2003) Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. Journal of Finance58(3): 1301–1328.
3.
AstrachanJHShankerMC (2003) Family businesses’ contribution to the U.S. economy: A closer look. Family Business Review16(3): 211–219.
4.
BaronRMKennyDA (1986) The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology51(6): 1173–1182.
5.
BascoR (2013) Exploring the influence of the family upon firm performance: Does strategic behaviour matter?International Small Business Journal. Epub ahead of print 6 May 2013. DOI: 10.1177/0266242613484946.
6.
BennedsenMWolfenzonD (2000) The balance of power in closely held corporations. Journal of Financial Economics58(1–2): 113–139.
7.
BennedsenMNielsenKMPerez-GonzalezF. (2007) Inside the family firm: The role of families in succession decisions and performance. The Quarterly Journal of Economics122(2): 647–691.
8.
BlockJHThamsA (2008) Long-term orientation in family firms: A Bayesian analysis of R&D spending. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings2008: 1–6.
9.
BlockJHJaskiewiczPMillerD (2011) Ownership versus management effects on performance in family and founder companies: A Bayesian reconciliation. Journal of Family Business Strategy2(4): 232–245.
10.
BloomNVan ReenenJ (2007) Measuring and explaining management practices across firms and countries. The Quarterly Journal of Economics122(4): 1351–1408.
11.
BreuschTSPaganAR (1979) A simple test for heteroscedasticity and random coefficient variation. Econometrica47(5): 1287–1294.
12.
BrighamKHLumpkinGTPayneGT. (2014) Researching long-term orientation: A validation study and recommendations for future research. Family Business Review27(1): 72–88.
13.
CarneyM (2005) Corporate governance and competitive advantage in family-controlled firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice29(3): 249–265.
14.
CastilloJWakefieldMW (2007) An exploration of firm performance factors in family businesses: Do families value only the ‘Bottom Line’?Journal of Small Business Strategy17(2): 37–51.
15.
ChiricoFBauM (2014) Is the family an ‘asset’ or ‘liability’ for firm performance? The moderating role of environmental dynamism. Journal of Small Business Management52(2): 210–225.
16.
ChrismanJJPatelPC (2012) Variations in R&D investments of family and non-family firms: Behavioral agency and myopic loss aversion perspectives. Academy of Management Journal55(4): 976–997.
17.
ChrismanJJChuaJHLitzRA (2004) Comparing the agency costs of family and non-family firms: Conceptual issues and exploratory evidence. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice28(4): 335–354.
18.
ChrismanJJChuaJHSharmaP (2005) Trends and directions in the development of a strategic management theory of the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice29(5): 555–575.
19.
ChrismanJJChuaJHKellermannsFW. (2007) Are family managers agents or stewards? An exploratory study in privately held family firms. Journal of Business Research60(10): 1030–1038.
20.
ChrismanJJChuaJHPearsonAW. (2012) Family involvement, family influence, and family-centered non-economic goals in small firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice36(2): 267–293.
21.
ChrismanJJSharmaPSteierLP. (2013) The influence of family goals, governance, and resources on firm outcomes. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice37(6): 1249–1261.
22.
ChuaJHChrismanJJSharmaP (1999) Defining the family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice23(4): 19–39.
ClaessensSDjankovSFanJPH. (2002) Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. The Journal of Finance57(6): 2741–2771.
25.
CollinsLMGrahamJJFlahertyBP (1998) An alternative framework for defining mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research33(2): 295–312.
26.
CookRDWeisbergS (1983) Diagnostics for heteroscedasticity in regression. Biometrika70(1): 1–10.
27.
CorbettaGSalvatoC (2004) Self-serving or self-actualizing? Models of man and agency costs in different types of family firms: A commentary on ‘Comparing the agency costs of family and non-family firms: Conceptual issues and exploratory evidence’. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice28(4): 355–362.
28.
CovinJGSlevinDP (1989) Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal10(1): 75–87.
29.
CromieSStephensonBMonteithD (1995) The management of family firms: An empirical investigation. International Small Business Journal13(4): 11–34.
30.
DailyCMDollingerMJ (1992) An empirical examination of ownership structure in family and professionally managed firms. Family Business Review5(2): 117–136.
31.
DavisJHAllenMRHayesHD (2010) Is blood thicker than water? A study of stewardship perceptions in family business. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice34(6): 1093–1116.
32.
DavisJHSchoormanFDDonaldsonL (1997) Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review22(1): 20–47.
33.
DeephouseDLJaskiewiczP (2013) Do family firms have better reputations than non-family firms? An integration of socioemotional wealth and social identity theories. Journal of Management Studies50(3): 337–360.
34.
De MassisAKotlarJCampopianoG. (2013a) Dispersion of family ownership and the performance of small-to-medium size private family firms. Journal of Family Business Strategy4(3): 166–175.
35.
De MassisAKotlarJCampopianoG. (2013b) The impact of family involvement on SMEs’ performance: Theory and evidence. Journal of Small Business Management. Epub ahead of print 29 December 2013. DOI: 10.1111/jsbm.12093.
36.
DessGGRobinsonRBJr (1984) Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of the privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit. Strategic Management Journal5(3): 265–273.
37.
DyerWG (2006) Examining the ‘family effect’ on firm performance. Family Business Review19(4): 253–273.
38.
DyerWGWhettenDA (2006) Family firms and social responsibility: Preliminary evidence from the S&P 500. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice30(6): 785–802.
39.
EddlestonKAKellermannsFW (2007) Destructive and productive family relationships: A stewardship theory perspective. Journal of Business Venturing22(4): 545–565.
40.
EddlestonKAKellermannsFWFloydSW. (2013) Planning for growth: Life stage differences in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice37(5): 1177–1202.
41.
FamaEFJensenMC (1983) Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law & Economics26(2): 301–326.
42.
FilatotchevIYung-ChihLPiesseJ (2005) Corporate governance and performance in publicly listed, family-controlled firms: Evidence from Taiwan. Asia Pacific Journal of Management22(3): 257–283.
43.
GedajlovicECarneyMChrismanJJ. (2012) The adolescence of family firm research: Taking stock and planning for the future. Journal of Management38(4): 1010–1037.
44.
GeorgeJMJonesGR (2000) The role of time in theory and theory building. Journal of Management26(4): 657–684.
45.
GersickKEDavisJAMcCollom HamptonM. (1997) Generation to Generation: Life Cycles of the Family Business. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
46.
Gomez-MejiaLRCampbellJTMartinG. (2013) Socioemotional wealth as a mixed gamble: Revisiting family firm R&D investments with the behavioral agency model. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. Epub ahead of print 6 December 2013. DOI: 10.1111/etap.12083.
47.
Gomez-MejiaLRHaynesKTNúñez-NickelM. (2007) Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly52(1): 106–137.
48.
HairJFJAndersonRETathamRL. (1995) Multivariate Data Analysis. New York: Macmillan.
49.
HartSBanburyC (1994) How strategy-making processes can make a difference. Strategic Management Journal15(4): 251–269.
50.
HoworthCRoseMHamiltonE. (2010) Family firm diversity and development: An introduction. International Small Business Journal28(5): 437–451.
51.
JamesHS (1999) Owner as manager, extended horizons and the family firm. International Journal of the Economics of Business6(1): 41–55.
52.
JaskiewiczPKleinS (2007) The impact of goal alignment on board composition and board size in family businesses. Journal of Business Research60(10): 1080–1089.
53.
JaskiewiczPLuchakAA (2013) Explaining performance differences between family firms with family and nonfamily CEOs: It’s the nature of the tie to the family that counts!Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice37(6): 1361–1367.
54.
JensenMCMecklingWH (1976) Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics3(4): 305–360.
55.
JuddCMKennyDA (1981) Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Evaluation Review5(5): 602–619.
56.
KanukLBerensonC (1975) Mail surveys and response rates: A literature review. Journal of Marketing Research22: 440–453.
57.
KellermannsFWEddlestonKSarathyR. (2012) Innovativeness in family firms: A family influence perspective. Small Business Economics38(1): 85–101.
58.
KennedyP (2008) A Guide to Econometrics. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
59.
KleinSB (2000) Family businesses in Germany: Significance and structure. Family Business Review13(3): 157–181.
60.
KowalewskiOTalaveraOStetsyukI (2010) Influence of family involvement in management and ownership on firm performance: Evidence from Poland. Family Business Review23(1): 45–59.
61.
La PortaRLopez-de-SilanesFShleiferA (1999) Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance54(2): 471–517.
62.
LauterbachBVaninskyA (1999) Ownership structure and firm performance: Evidence from Israel. Journal of Management & Governance3(2): 189–201.
63.
LavertyKJ (1996) Economic ‘short-termism’: The debate, the unresolved issues, and the implications for management practice and research. Academy of Management Review21(3): 825–860.
64.
Le Breton-MillerIMillerD (2006) Why do some family businesses out-compete? Governance, long-term orientations, and sustainable capability. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice30(6): 731–746.
65.
Le Breton-MillerIMillerD (2009) Agency vs. stewardship in public family firms: A social embeddedness reconciliation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice33(6): 1169–1191.
66.
LeeJ (2006) Family firm performance: Further evidence. Family Business Review19(2): 103–114.
67.
LingYKellermannsFW (2010) The effects of family firm specific sources of TMT diversity: The moderating role of information exchange frequency. Journal of Management Studies47(2): 322–344.
68.
LubatkinMHSchulzeWSLingY. (2005) The effects of parental altruism on the governance of family-managed firms. Journal of Organizational Behavior26(3): 313–330.
69.
LumpkinGTBrighamKH (2011) Long-term orientation and intertemporal choice in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice35(6): 1149–1169.
70.
LumpkinGTBrighamKHMossT (2010) Long-term orientation: Implications for the entrepreneurial orientation and performance of family businesses. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development22(3–4): 241–264.
71.
LuoXChungC-N (2005) Keeping it all in the family: The role of particularistic relationships in business group performance during institutional transition. Administrative Science Quarterly50(3): 404–439.
72.
McConaughyDL (2000) Family CEOs vs. nonfamily CEOs in the family-controlled firm: An examination of the level and sensitivity of pay to performance. Family Business Review13(2): 121–131.
73.
McConaughyDLMatthewsCHFialkoAS (2001) Founding family controlled firms: Performance, risk and value. Journal of Small Business Management39(1): 31–49.
74.
MacKinnonDPFairchildAJFritzMS (2007) Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology58(1): 593–614.
75.
MauryB (2006) Family ownership and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Western European corporations. Journal of Corporate Finance12(2): 321–341.
76.
MazziC (2011) Family business and financial performance: Current state of knowledge and future research challenges. Journal of Family Business Strategy2(3): 166–181.
77.
MazzolaPSciasciaSKellermannsFW (2013) Non-linear effects of family sources of power on performance. Journal of Business Research66(4): 568–574.
78.
MillerDLe Breton-MillerI (2005) Managing for the Long Run: Lessons in Competitive Advantage from Great Family Businesses. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
79.
MillerDLe Breton-MillerI (2006) Family governance and firm performance: Agency, stewardship, and capabilities. Family Business Review19(1): 73–87.
80.
MillerDLe Breton-MillerILesterRH (2011) Family and lone founder ownership and strategic behaviour: Social context, identity, and institutional logics. Journal of Management Studies48(1): 1–25.
81.
MillerDLe Breton-MillerIScholnickB (2008) Stewardship vs. stagnation: An empirical comparison of small family and non-family businesses. Journal of Management Studies45(1): 51–78.
82.
MillerDMinichilliACorbettaG (2013) Is family leadership always beneficial?Strategic Management Journal34(5): 553–571.
83.
MinichilliACorbettaGMacMillanIC (2010) Top management teams in family-controlled companies: ‘Familiness’, ‘faultlines’, and their impact on financial performance. Journal of Management Studies47(2): 205–222.
84.
MorckRWolfenzonDBernardY (2005) Corporate governance, economic entrenchment, and growth. Journal of Economic Literature43(3): 655–720.
85.
MowdayRTPorterLWSteersRM (1982) Employee-Organization Linkages: The Psychology of Commitment, Absenteeism, and Turnover. New York: Academic Press.
86.
O’BoyleEHJrPollackJMRutherfordMW (2012) Exploring the relation between family involvement and firms’ financial performance: A meta-analysis of main and moderator effects. Journal of Business Venturing27(1): 1–18.
87.
OgdenSWatsonR (1999) Corporate performance and stakeholder management: Balancing shareholder and customer interests in the UK privatized water industry. Academy of Management Journal42(5): 526–538.
88.
PieperTMKleinSBJaskiewiczP (2008) The impact of goal alignment on board existence and top management team composition: Evidence from family-influenced businesses. Journal of Small Business Management46(3): 372–394.
89.
PodsakoffPMOrganDW (1986) Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management12(4): 531–544.
90.
PodsakoffPMMacKenzieSBJeong-YeonL. (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology88(5): 879–903.
91.
ReynoldsSJSchultzFCHekmanDR (2006) Stakeholder theory and managerial decision-making: Constraints and implications of balancing stakeholder interests. Journal of Business Ethics64(3): 285–301.
92.
SchulzeWSLubatkinMHDinoRN (2002) Altruism, agency, and the competitiveness of family firms. Managerial and Decision Economics23(4–5): 247–259.
93.
SchulzeWSLubatkinMHDinoRN (2003) Toward a theory of agency and altruism in family firms. Journal of Business Venturing18(4): 473–490.
94.
SchulzeWSLubatkinMHDinoRN. (2001) Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organization Science12(2): 99–116.
95.
SciasciaSMazzolaP (2008) Family involvement in ownership and management: Exploring nonlinear effects on performance. Family Business Review21(4): 331–345.
96.
SciasciaSMazzolaPKellermannsFW (2014) Family management and profitability in private family-owned firms: Introducing generational stage and the socioemotional wealth perspective. Journal of Family Business Strategy5(2): 131–137.
97.
ShapiroSP (2005) Agency theory. Annual Review of Sociology31: 263–284.
98.
SraerDThesmarD (2007) Performance and behavior of family firms: Evidence from the French stock market. Journal of the European Economic Association5(4): 709–751.
99.
VenkatramanNRamanujamV (1987) Measurement of business economic performance: An examination of method convergence. Journal of Management13(1): 109–122.
100.
VillalongaBAmitR (2006) How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value?Journal of Financial Economics80(2): 385–417.
101.
WestheadPHoworthC (2006) Ownership and management issues associated with family firm performance and company objectives. Family Business Review19(4): 301–316.
102.
WoodREGoodmanJSBeckmannN. (2008) Mediation testing in management research: A review and proposals. Organizational Research Methods11(2): 270–295.
103.
ZellwegerTM (2007) Time horizon, costs of equity capital, and generic investment strategies of firms. Family Business Review20(1): 1–15.
104.
ZellwegerTMAstrachanJH (2008) On the emotional value of owning a firm. Family Business Review21(4): 347–363.
105.
ZellwegerTMKellermannsFWChrismanJJ. (2012a) Family control and family firm valuation by family CEOs: The importance of intentions for transgenerational control. Organization Science23(3): 851–868.
106.
ZellwegerTMNasonRSNordqvistM (2012b) From longevity of firms to transgenerational entrepreneurship of families: Introducing family entrepreneurial orientation. Family Business Review25(2): 136–155.
