This article analyses the effect of entrepreneurial orientation (EO) on organizational learning (OL) in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and the role of business/university engagement on the relationship between these two constructs. A cross-sectional research design, drawing upon a postal questionnaire survey, was employed to collect data from a sample of 206 UK SMEs. The results obtained from both the regression and moderated regression analyses revealed that EO positively impacts the level of OL in SMEs. In addition, business/university engagement was found to be a significant moderator in this relationship. These findings provide important academic, practitioner, and policy implications.
AguinisHGottfredsonRK (2010) Best-practice recommendations for estimating interaction effects using moderated multiple regression. Journal of Organizational Behavior31: 776–786.
2.
AnatanL (2013) A proposed framework of university to industry knowledge transfer. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research2(2): 304–325.
3.
AndersonJCGerbingDW (1988) Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two step approach. Psychological Bulletin103(3): 411–423.
4.
AshforthBESlussDMSaksAM (2007) Socialization tactics, proactive behavior, and newcomer learning: Integrating socialization models. Journal of Vocational Behavior70: 447–462.
5.
ArmstrongJSOvertonTS (1977) Estimating non-response bias in mail survey. Journal of Marketing Research14: 396–402.
6.
Azagra-CaroJM (2007) What type of faculty member interacts with what type of firm? Some reasons for the delocalisation of university–industry interaction. Technovation27(11): 704–715.
7.
BabaYShichijoNSeditaSR (2009) How do collaborations with universities affect firms’ innovative performance? The role of ‘Pasteur scientists’ in the advanced materials field. Research Policy38(5): 756–764.
8.
BarneyJB (1991) Firms resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management17(1): 99–120.
9.
BarneyJ (2001) Is the resource based ‘view’ a useful perspective for strategic management research? Yes. Academy of Management Review26(1): 41–56.
BoucherGConwayCVan der MeerE (2003) Tiers of engagement by universities in their region’s development. Regional Studies37(9): 887–897.
12.
CavusgilSTCalantoneRJZhaoY (2003) Tacit knowledge transfer and firm innovation capability. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing18(1): 6–21.
13.
ChastonIBadgerBSadler-SmithE (2001) Organizational learning: An empirical assessment of process in small U.K. manufacturing firms. Journal of Small Business Management39(2): 139–151.
14.
ConnerKPrahaladC (1996) A resource-based theory of the firm: Knowledge versus opportunism. Organization Science7(5): 477–501.
15.
CoshAHughesA (2010) Never mind the quality feel the width: University-industry links and government financial support for innovation in small high-technology businesses in the UK and the USA. Journal of Technology Transfer35: 66–91.
16.
CovinJGSlevinDP (1989) Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal10: 75–87.
17.
CovinJGLumpkinGT (2011) Entrepreneurial orientation theory and research: Reflections on a needed construct. Entrepreneurship, Theory and Practice35(5): 855–872.
18.
De ClercqDSapienzaHJCrijnsH (2005) The internationalization of small and medium-sized firms. Small Business Economics24: 409–419.
19.
De ClercqDDimovDThongpapanlN (2010) The moderating impact of internal social exchange processes on the entrepreneurial orientation-performance relationship. Journal of Business Venturing25(1): 87–103.
20.
DecterMCaveFRoseM. (2011) Universities and economic development activities: A UK regional comparison. Industry and Higher Education25(5): 359–374.
21.
DessGGIrelandRDZahraSA. (2003) Emerging issues in corporate entrepreneurship. Journal of Management29: 351–378.
22.
FletcherDEWatsonTJ (2007) Entrepreneurship, management learning and negotiated narratives: ‘Making it otherwise for us – Otherwise for them’. Management Learning38(1): 9–26.
23.
García-AracilAFernández De LucioI (2008) Industry–university interactions in a peripheral European region: An empirical study of Valencian firms. Regional Studies42(2): 215–227.
24.
GibbAA (2009) Meeting the development needs of owner managed small enterprise: A discussion of the centrality of action learning. Action Learning: Research and Practice6(3): 209–227.
25.
GrantRM (1996a) Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science7(4): 375–387.
26.
GrantRM (1996b) Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal17: 109–122.
27.
GustavsJCleggS (2005) Working the knowledge game? Universities and corporate organizations in partnership. Management Learning36(1): 9–30.
28.
HambrickDCGeletkanyczMAFredricksonJW (1993) Top executive commitment to the status quo: Some tests of its determinants. Strategic Management Journal14(6): 401–418.
29.
HansenBHamiltonRT (2011) Factors distinguishing small firm growers and non-growers. International Small Business Journal29(3): 278–294.
30.
HittMASirmonDG (2003) Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management, and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship, Theory and Practice27(4): 339–358.
31.
HoworthCHamiltonE (2012) Family businesses. In: CarterSJones-EvansD (eds) Enterprise and Small Business: Principles, Practice and Policy. Harlow: Pearson, pp.232–251.
32.
HugginsRJohnstonASteffensonR (2008) Universities, knowledge networks and regional policy. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society1: 321–340.
33.
HughesMMorganR (2007) Deconstructing the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and business performance at the embryonic stage of firm growth. Industrial Marketing Management36(5): 651–661.
34.
HughesTBenceDGrisoniL. (2011) Scholarship that matters: Academic–practitioner engagement in business and management. Academy of Management Learning & Education10(1): 40–57.
35.
JavalgiRGMartinCL (2007) Internationalization of services: Identifying the building-blocks for future research. Journal of Services Marketing21: 391–397.
36.
Jiménez-JiménezDSanz-ValleR (2011) Innovation, organizational learning, and performance. Journal of Business Research64(4): 408–417.
37.
JonesOMacphersonA (2006) Inter-organizational learning and strategic renewal in SMEs: Extending the 4I framework. Long Range Planning39: 155–175.
38.
KayaN (2006) The impact of human resource management practices and corporate entrepreneurship on firm performance: Evidence from Turkish firms. International Journal of Human Resource Management17(12): 2074–2090.
39.
KehHTNguyenTTMNgHP (2007) The effects of entrepreneurial orientation and marketing information on the performance of SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing22: 592–611.
40.
KourilskyMLWalstadWB (1998) Entrepreneurship and female youth: Knowledge, attitudes, gender differences, and educational practices. Journal of Business Venturing13(1): 77–88.
41.
KreiserPM (2011) Entrepreneurial orientation and organizational learning: The impact of network range and network closure. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice35(5): 1025–1050.
42.
LangerakF (2003) The effect of market orientation on positional advantage and organizational performance. Journal of Strategic Marketing11: 93–115.
43.
LaursenKReichsteinTSalterA (2011) Exploring the effect of geographical proximity and university quality on university–industry collaboration in the United Kingdom. Regional Studies45(4): 507–523.
44.
LeeCLeeKPenningsJM (2001) Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: A study on technology-based ventures. Strategic Management Journal22: 615–640.
45.
LeeLTSukocoBM (2007) The effects of entrepreneurial orientation and knowledge management capability on organizational effectiveness in Taiwan: The moderating role of social capital. International Journal of Management24(3): 549–572.
46.
LeeHKelleyDLeeJ. (2012) SME survival: The impact of internationalization, technology resources, and alliances. Journal of Small Business Management50(1): 1–19.
47.
LepoutreJHeeneA (2006) Investigating the impact of firm size on small business social responsibility: A critical review. Journal of Business Ethics67: 257–273.
48.
LiYGuoHLiuY. (2008a) Incentive mechanisms, entrepreneurial orientation, and technology commercialization: Evidence from China’s transitional economy. Journal of Product Innovation Management25: 63–78.
49.
LiYZhaoYTanJ. (2008b) Moderating effects of entrepreneurial orientation on market orientation-performance linkage: Evidence from Chinese small firms. Journal of Small Business Management46(1): 113–133.
50.
LiYHuangJTsaiM (2009) Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: The role of knowledge creation process. Industrial Marketing Management38: 440–449.
51.
LiLLiDWeileiS (2011) Internationalization, internalization and the performance of US biopharmaceutical SMEs. Multinational Business Review19: 65–93.
52.
LockettNKerrRRobinsonS (2008) Multiple perspectives on the challenges for knowledge transfer between higher education institutions and industry. International Small Business Journal26(6): 661–681.
53.
LumpkinGTDessG (1996) Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review21(1): 135–172.
54.
McDougallPPOviattBMShraderR (2003) A comparison of international and domestic new ventures. Journal of International Entrepreneurship1: 59–82.
55.
MavondoFTChimhanziJStewartJ (2005) Learning orientation and market orientation: Relationship with innovation, human resource practices and performance. European Journal of Marketing39(11–12): 1235–1263.
56.
MengucBAuhS (2006) Creating a firm-level dynamic capability through capitalizing on market orientation and innovativeness. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science34: 63–73.
57.
MessersmithJGWalesWJ (2011) Entrepreneurial orientation and performance in young firms: The role of human resource management. International Small Business Journal31(2): 115–136.
58.
MillerD (1983) The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science29(7): 770–791.
59.
MillerD (2011) Miller (1983) revisited: A reflection on EO research and some suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice35(5): 873–894.
60.
MillerDFriesenPH (1982) Innovation in conservative and entrepreneurial firms: Two models of strategic momentum. Strategic Management Journal3: 1–25.
61.
MorrisMHSchindehutteMLaForgeRW (2002) Entrepreneurial marketing: A construct for integrating emerging entrepreneurship and marketing perspectives. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice10(4): 1–19.
62.
MorrisMHWebbJWFranklinRJ (2011) Understanding the manifestation of entrepreneurial orientation in the nonprofit context. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice35(5): 947–971.
63.
NiedergasselBLekerJ (2011) Different dimensions of knowledge in cooperative R&D projects of university scientists. Technovation31(4): 142–150.
64.
NumprasertchaiSIgelB (2005) Managing knowledge through collaboration: Multiple case studies of managing research in university laboratories in Thailand. Technovation25(10): 1173–1182.
65.
ONS (2012) Regional profiles: Economy–North West, May 2012. Available at: www.ons.gov.uk/ (accessed on 4 June 2014).
66.
PearceJAIIFritzDADavisPS (2010) Entrepreneurial orientation and the performance of religious congregations as predicted by rational choice theory. Entrepreneurship, Theory and Practice34(1): 219–248.
67.
PhilbinSP (2012) Resource-based view of university-industry research collaboration. In: Proceedings of the Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), Vancouver, BC, Canada, 29July–2August, pp.400–411. New York: IEEE.
68.
PodsakoffPMOrganDW (1986) Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management12(4): 531–544.
69.
PodsakoffPMMacKenzieSBLeeJ. (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology88: 879–903.
70.
PowellJ (2012) The university role in the innovative leadership of small to medium sized enterprises: Towards ‘universities for a modern renaissance’ (UMR). International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research18(4): 396–416.
71.
PowersJB (2003) Commercializing academic research: Resource effects on performance of university technology transfer. Journal of Higher Education74(1): 26–50.
72.
PowersJBMcDougallPP (2005) University start-up formation and technology licensing with firms that go public: A resource-based view of academic entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing20(3): 291–311.
73.
RauchAWiklundJLumpkinGT. (2009) Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance: An assessment of past research and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice33(3): 761–787.
74.
RaymondLSt-PierreJ (2013) Strategic capability configurations for the internationalization of SMEs: A study in equifinality. International Small Business Journal31(1): 82–102.
75.
RealJCRoldánJLLealA (2014) From entrepreneurial orientation and learning orientation to business performance: Analysing the mediating role of organizational learning and the moderating effects of organizational size. British Journal of Management25(2): 186–208.
76.
RheeJParkTLeeDH (2010) Drivers of innovativeness and performance for innovative SMEs in South Korea: Mediation of learning orientation. Technovation30(1): 65–75.
77.
RunyanRDrogeCSwinneyJ (2008) Entrepreneurial orientation versus small business orientation: What are their relationships to firm performance?Journal of Small Business Management46(4): 567–588.
78.
RuzzierMHisrichRDAntoncicB (2006) SME internationalization research: Past, present, and future. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development13(4): 476–497.
79.
SantoroMDBierlyPE (2006) Facilitators of knowledge transfer in university-industry collaborations: A knowledge-based perspective. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management53(4): 495–507.
80.
SanzoMJSantosMLGarcíaN. (2012) Trust as a moderator of the relationship between organizational learning and marketing capabilities: Evidence from Spanish SMEs. International Small Business Journal30(6): 700–726.
81.
SiguawJASimpsonPMEnzCA (2006) Conceptualizing innovation orientation: A framework for study and integration of innovation research. Journal of Product Innovation Management23(6): 556–574.
82.
SimpsonMTaylorNPadmoreJ (2011) The role and relevance model of marketing in SMEs. In: NwankwoSGbadamosiA (eds) Entrepreneurship Marketing: Principles and Practice of SME Marketing. Abingdon: Routledge, pp.30–44.
83.
SimsekZVeigaJFLubatkinMH (2007) The impact of managerial environmental perceptions on corporate entrepreneurship: Towards understanding discretionary slack’s pivotal role. Journal of Management Studies44(8): 1398–1424.
84.
SimsekZHeaveyCVeigaJF (2010) The impact of CEO core self-evaluation on the firm’s entrepreneurial orientation. Strategic Management Journal31: 110–119.
85.
SME Statistics (2010) Small and medium-sized enterprise (SME) statistics for the UK and regions, 2009: Methodology note. Available at: http://stats.bis.gov.uk/ed/sme/ (accessed on 4 June 2014).
86.
SmithSRoseMHamiltonE (2010) The story of a university knowledge exchange actor-network told through the sociology of translation: A case study. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research16(6): 502–516.
87.
SpicerDPSadler-SmithE (2006) Organizational learning in smaller manufacturing firms. International Small Business Journal24(2): 133–158.
88.
StamWElfringT (2008) Entrepreneurial orientation and new venture performance: The moderating role of intra- and extra-industry social capital. Academy of Management Journal51(1): 97–111.
89.
TangYK (2011) The influence of networking on the internationalization of SMEs: Evidence from internationalized Chinese firms. International Small Business Journal29(4): 374–398.
90.
UcbasaranAD (2004) Business ownership experience, entrepreneurial behavior and performance: Novice, habitual, serial and portfolio entrepreneurs. PhD Thesis, University of Nottingham.
91.
WalesWJGuptaVKMousaF-T (2013) Empirical research on entrepreneurial orientation: An assessment and suggestions for future research. International Small Business Journal31(4): 357–383.
92.
WalterAAuerMRitterT (2006) The impact of network capabilities and entrepreneurial orientation on University spin-off performance. Journal of Business Venturing21: 541–567.
93.
WangCL (2008) Entrepreneurial orientation, learning orientation, and firm performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice32(4): 635–657.
94.
WeavenSGraceDManningM (2009) Franchisee personality: An examination in the context of franchise unit density and service classification. European Journal of Marketing43(1–2): 90–109.
95.
WestheadPWrightMUcbasaranD (2004) Internationalization of private firms: Environmental turbulence and organizational strategies and resources. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development16: 501–522.
96.
WestheadPHoworthC (2006) Ownership and management issues associated with family firm performance and company objectives. Family Business Review19(4): 301–316.
97.
WiklundJShepherdD (2003) Knowledge-based resources, entrepreneurial orientation, and the performance of small and medium-sized businesses. Strategic Management Journal24: 1307–1314.
98.
WiklundJShepherdD (2005) Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: A configurational approach. Journal of Business Venturing20: 71–91.
99.
WiklundJPatzeltHShepherdD (2009) Building an integrative model of small business growth. Small Business Economics32: 351–374.
WorthingtonIRamMJonesT (2006) ‘Giving something back’: A study of corporate social responsibility in UK South Asian small enterprises. Business Ethics: A European Review15(1): 95–108.
102.
WrightMWestheadPUcbasaranD (2007) Internationalization of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and international entrepreneurship: A critique and policy implications. Regional Studies41(7): 1013–1029.
103.
WrightMClarysseBLockettA. (2008) Mid-range universities’ linkages with industry: Knowledge types and the role of intermediaries. Research Policy37(8): 1205–1223.
104.
ZhaoYLiYLeeSH. (2011) Entrepreneurial orientation, organizational learning, and performance: Evidence from China. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice35(2): 293–317.
