This article explores the potential of university technology business incubators to enhance the absorptive capacity of new technology-based firms. The research pursues three critical themes: it employs the absorptive capacity construct to analyse and evaluate the potential of incubation to strengthen the business model of new technology firms. It then explores the interaction between founders and incubator directors, mentors and business advisers to assess how this might enhance absorptive capacity. Finally, it indicates how such interactions can facilitate the transition from potential to realised absorptive capacity. The article interrogates the incubation process by using the absorptive capacity framework to evaluate how it might strengthen the business model of new technology firms. The qualitative findings suggest that where founders, advisers, mentors and incubator directors engage collaboratively to create an iterative dialogue which informs the development of a viable business model, the process by which potential absorptive capacity can be fully realised is substantially strengthened.
AernoudtR (2004) Incubators: tool for entrepreneurship?Small Business Economics23(2): 127–135.
2.
AlbertPGaynorL (2003) National contexts, incubator families and trends in incubation: views from four countries. Paper presented at the 48th ICSB Conference Proceedings, Belfast, 16–18 June.
3.
ArdichviliACardozoRRayS (2003) A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development. Journal of Business Venturing18(1): 105–123.
4.
ArnoldEAllinsonRMuscioA. (2004) Making Best Use of Technological Knowledge: A Study of Absorptive Capacity of Irish SMEs. Brighton: Technopolis.
5.
AutioEKlofstenM (1998) A comparative study of two European business incubators. Journal of Small Business Management36(1): 30–43.
6.
BarkemaHGVermeulenF (1998) International expansion through start-up or acquisition: A learning perspective. Academy of Management Journal41(1): 7–26.
7.
BruneelJRatinhoTClarysseB (2012) The evolution of business incubators: Comparing demand and supply of business incubation services across different incubator generations. Technovation32(2): 110–121.
8.
ChenYSLinMJJChangCH (2009) The positive effects of relationship learning and absorptive capacity on innovation performance and competitive advantage in industrial markets. Industrial Marketing Management38(2): 152–158.
9.
ChildJ (1984) Organization: A Guide to Problems and Practice (2nd edn). London: Harper and Row.
10.
CohenWMLevinthalDA (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly35(1): 128–152.
11.
CopeJWattsG (2000) Learning by doing: An exploration of experience, critical incidents and reflection in entrepreneurial learning. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research6(3): 104–124.
12.
Daily Telegraph (2010) Millbrook Technology Campus in Southampton: An incubator full of surprises, 8February, p. B6.
13.
DalleyJHamiltonRT (2000) Knowledge, context and learning in small business. International Small Business Journal18(3): 51–59.
DyerJHSinghH (1998) The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review23(4): 660–679.
16.
Easterby-SmithMGraçaMAntonacopoulouE. (2008) Absorptive capacity: A process perspective. Management Learning39(5): 483–501.
17.
EisenhardtMK (1989) Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review14(4): 532–550.
18.
FergusonROlofssonC (2004) Science parks and the development of NTBFs: Location, survival and growth. Journal of Technology Transfer29(1): 5–17.
19.
Financial Times (2008) Innovators hitch a ride on drive for national security, 27February, p. 17.
20.
Garrett-JonesSTurpinTBurnsP. (2005) Common purpose and divided loyalties: The risks and rewards of cross-sector collaboration for academic and government researchers. R&D Management35(5): 535–544.
21.
GibbAA (1997) Small firms’ training and competitiveness: Building on the small business as a learning organisation. International Small Business Journal15(3): 13–29.
22.
GoffeeRScaseR (1995) Corporate Realities: The Dynamics of Large and Small Organisations. London: Routledge.
23.
GuptaAKGovindarajanV (2000) Knowledge flows within the multinational corporation. Strategic Management Journal21(4): 473–496.
24.
HacketSMDiltsDM (2004) A systematic review of business incubation research. Journal of Technology Transfer29(1): 55–82.
25.
HiteJMHesterlyWS (2001) The evolution of firm networks: From emergence to early growth of the firm. Strategic Management Journal22(3): 275–286.
26.
HjorthDJonesCGartnerWB (2008) Recreating/recontextualising entrepreneurship. Scandinavian Journal of Management21(2): 81–84.
27.
HolmqvistM (2003) A dynamic model of intra- and interorganizational learning. Organization Studies24(1): 95–123.
28.
HughesMHughesPMorganRE (2007) Exploitative learning and entrepreneurial orientation alignment in emerging young firms: Implications for market and response performance. British Journal of Management18(4): 359–375.
29.
JohnsG (2006) The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review31(2): 396–408.
30.
JonesOCravenM (2001) Expanding capabilities in a mature manufacturing firm: Absorptive capacity and the TCS. International Small Business Journal19(3): 355–377.
31.
KimL (1998) Crisis construction and organizational learning: Capability building in catching-up at Hyundai Motor. Organization Science9(4): 506–521.
32.
LahtiT (2014) The value-added contribution of advisers in the process of acquiring venture capital. International Small Business Journal32(3): 307–326.
LanePKokaBPathakS (2006) The reification of absorptive capacity: A critical review and rejuvenation of the construct. Academy of Management Review31(4): 833–863.
35.
LeeSSOsteryoungSJ (2004) A comparison of critical success factors for effective operations of university business incubators in the United States and Korea. Journal of Small Business Management42(4): 418–426.
36.
LenoxMKingA (2004) Prospects for developing absorptive capacity through internal information provision. Strategic Management Journal25(4): 331–345.
McAdamMMarlowS (2007) Building futures or stealing secrets? Entrepreneurial cooperation and conflict within business incubators. International Journal of Small Business25(4): 359–377.
39.
McAdamMMarlowS (2011) Sense and sensibility: The role of business incubator client advisers in assisting high technology entrepreneurs to make sense of investment readiness status. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development23(7-8): 449–468.
40.
MarchJG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organisational learning. Organization Science2(1): 71–87.
41.
MarchJG (1999) The Pursuit of Organizational Intelligence. Oxford: Blackwell.
42.
MianSA (1996) Assessing value-added contributions of university technology business incubators to tenant firms. Research Policy25(3): 325–335.
43.
MoseySWrightM (2007) From human capital to social capital: A longitudinal study of technology-based academic entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice31(6): 909–935.
44.
NESTA (2008) Total Innovation. London: NESTA.
45.
OakeyR (2003) Technical entreprenenurship in high technology small firms: Some observations on the implications for management. Technovation23(8): 679–688.
46.
PenroseE (1959) The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. New York: Wiley.
47.
PettigrewA (1997) What is processual analysis?Scandanvian Journal of Management 13(4): 337–348.
48.
RiceMPMathewsJ (1995) Growing New Ventures, Creating New Jobs: Principles and Practices of Successful Business Incubation. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
49.
RiceMP (2002) Co-production of business assistance in business incubators: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing17(2): 163–187.
50.
RobsonC (2002) Real World Research (2nd edn). Oxford: Blackwell.
51.
RothaermelFTThursbyM (2005) University–incubator firm knowledge flows: Assessing their impact on incubator firm performance. Research Policy34(3): 305–320.
52.
ScillitoeJLChakrabartiAK (2010) The role of incubator interactions in assisting new ventures. Technovation30(3): 155–167.
53.
ShaneSVenkataramanS (2000) The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review25(1): 217–226.
54.
ShaneSKhuranaR (2003) Bringing individuals back in: The effects of career experience on new firm founding. Industrial and Corporate Change12(3): 519–543.
55.
ShepherdDADouglasEJShanleyM (2000) New venture survival: Ignorance, external shocks, and risk reduction strategies. Journal of Business Venturing15(5–6): 393–410.
56.
SimoninBL (1999) Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal20(7): 595–623.
57.
SmilorRW (1987) Commercializing technology through new business incubators. Research Management30(5): 36–41.
58.
StinchcombeA (1965) Social structure and organizations. In: MarchJ (ed.) Handbook of Organizations. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally, pp.142–193.
59.
StoreyDGreeneF (2010) Small Business and Entrepreneurship. Harlow: Pearson Education.
60.
StraussACorbinJ (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
61.
StuddardNL (2006) The effectiveness of entrepreneurial firms’ knowledge acquisition from a business incubator. International Entrepreneurship Management Journal2(2): 211–225.
62.
SunPAndersonM (2010) An examination of the relationship between absorptive capacity and organisational learning. International Journal of Management Review12(2): 130–150.
63.
TheyelN (2013) Extending open innovation throughout the value chain by small and medium-sized manufacturers. International Small Business Journal31(3): 256–274.
64.
TodorovaGDurisinB (2007) Absorptive capacity: Valuing a reconceptualisation. Academy of Management Review32(3): 774–786.
65.
TsaiW (2001) Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal44(5): 996–1004.
66.
VolberdaHWFossNJLylesMA (2010) Absorbing the concept of absorptive capacity: How to realize its potential in the organization field. Organization Science21(4): 931–951.
67.
VossC (2002) Case research in operations management. International Journal of Operations and Production Management22(2): 195–219.
68.
WynarczykPPiperopoulosPMcAdamM (2013) Open innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises: An overview. International Small Business Journal31(3): 240–255.
69.
YinRK (1994) Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
70.
ZahraSAGeorgeG (2002) Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualisation, and extension. Academy of Management Review27(2): 185–203.
71.
ZahraSAHaytonJC (2008) The effect of international venturing on firm performance: The moderating influence of ACAP. Journal of Business Venturing23(2): 195–220.
72.
ZhangMMacPhersonAJonesO (2006) Conceptualising the learning process. International Small Business Journal24(3): 299–323.
