This article draws upon a sample of more than 27,000 Chinese small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to explore whether and how foreign equity investment in local SMEs affects the cost of debt. The results show that foreign ownership lowers the cost of borrowing for Chinese SMEs, and that this effect is stronger in more developed provinces. These findings contribute to evidence regarding the halo effect of foreign direct investment in emerging markets. This study also expands pecking order theory by demonstrating the signalling effect of equity structure characteristics on debt financing.
BallRShivakumarL (2005) Earnings quality in UK private firms: Comparative loss recognition timeliness. Journal of Accounting and Economics39(1): 83–128.
2.
BellRGFilatotchevIRasheedA (2012) Beyond product markets: New insight on liability of foreignness from capital markets. Journal of International Business Studies43(2): 107–122.
3.
BergerANUdellGF (1995) Relationships lending and lines of credit in small firm finance. Journal of Business68(3): 351–382.
4.
BergerANUdellGF (1998) The economics of small business finance: The roles of private equity and debt markets in the financial growth cycle. Journal of Banking and Finance22(6–8): 613–673.
5.
BergerAKlapperLUdellG (2001) The ability of banks to lend to informationally opaque small businesses. Journal of Banking and Finance25(12): 2127–2167.
6.
BorenszteinEDe GregorioJLeeJW (1998) How does foreign direct investment affect economic growth?Journal of International Economics45(1): 115–135.
7.
BrewerTLYoungS (1997) Investment incentives and the international agenda. World Economy20(2) 175–198.
8.
BuckleyPJCassonM (1976) Future of the Multinational Enterprise. London: Macmillan.
9.
BusenitzLWFietJOMoeselDD (2005) Signaling in venture capitalist–new venture team funding decisions: Does it indicate long-term venture outcomes?Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice29(1): 1–12.
10.
CampbellTSKracawWA (1980) Information production, market signalling, and the theory of financial intermediation. Journal of Finance35(4): 863–882.
11.
CarterSMasonCTaggS (2004) Lifting the Barriers to Growth in UK Small Businesses: The FSB Biennial Membership Survey. London: Federation of Small Businesses.
12.
CarterSShawELamW. (2007) Gender, entrepreneurship, and bank lending: The criteria and processes used by bank loan officers in assessing applications. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice31(3): 427–444.
13.
CavalluzzoKSCavalluzzoLCWolkenJ (2002) Competition small business financing and discrimination: Evidence from a new survey. Journal of Business75(4): 641–679.
14.
CavesRE (1982) Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
ChangSJXuD (2008) Spillovers and competition among foreign and local firms in China. Strategic Management Journal29(5): 495–518.
16.
ChenGFirthMGaoDN. (2006) Ownership structure corporate governance and fraud: Evidence from China. Journal of Corporate Finance12(3): 424–448.
17.
ChenDNewburryWParkSH (2009) Improving sustainability: An international evolutionary framework. Journal of International Management15(3): 317–327.
18.
ChenDPaikYParkSH (2010) Host-country policies and MNE management control in IJVs: Evidence from China. Journal of International Business Studies41(3): 526–537.
19.
ChildJTseTK (2001) China’s transition and its implications for international business. Journal of International Business Studies32(1): 5–21.
20.
ChuaJHWuZ(2012) Value added by angel investors through post-investment involvement: Exploratory evidence and ownership implications. In: CummingDJ (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Venture Capital. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.721–750.
21.
ChuaJHChrismanJJKellermannsF. (2011) Family involvement and new venture debt financing. Journal of Business Venturing26(4): 472–488.
22.
ColeMAElliotRStroblE (2008) The environmental performance of firms: The role of foreign ownership training and experience. Ecological Economics65(3): 538–546.
23.
ConnellyBLCertoSTIrelandRD. (2011) Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of Management37(1): 39–67.
24.
CummingDJ (2006) Adverse selection and capital structure: Evidence from venture capital. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice30(2): 155–184.
25.
CummingDJDaiN (2011) Limited attention fund size and the valuation of venture capital backed companies. Journal of Empirical Finance18(1): 2–15.
26.
DiamondD (1984) Financial intermediation and delegated monitoring. Review of Economic Studies51(3): 393–414.
27.
DuJLuYTaoZ (2012) Institutions and FDI location choice: The role of cultural distances. Journal of Asian Economics23(3): 210–223.
28.
EdenLMolotMA (2002) Insiders outsiders and host country bargains. Journal of International Management8(4): 359–388.
29.
EdenLMillerSR (2004) Distance matters: Liability of foreignness institutional distance and ownership strategy. In: HittMChengJ (eds) Advances in International Management, Vol. 16. New York: Elsevier, pp.187–221.
30.
FamaEJensenMC (1983) Agency problems and residual claims. Journal of Law and Economics26(2): 327–349.
31.
FanGWangX (2004) NERI Index of Marketization of China’s Provinces 2004 ReportBeijing: Economic Science Press.
32.
FanGWangXZhuH (2007) NERI Index of Marketization of China’s Provinces 2006 ReportBeijing: Economic Science Press.
33.
FarrellEHoworthCWrightM (2008) A review of sampling and definitional issues in informal venture capital research. Venture Capital10(4): 331–353.
34.
FerrisSJagannathanMPritchardA (2003) Too busy to mind the business? Monitoring by directors with multiple board appointments. Journal of Finance58(3): 1087–1111.
35.
FrankMZGoyalVK (2003) Testing the pecking order theory of capital structure. Journal of Financial Economics67(2): 217–248.
36.
GhoseSLowengartO (2001) Perceptual positioning of international national and private brands in a growing international market: An empirical study. Journal of Brand Management9(1): 45–62.
37.
HanCM (1989) Country image: Halo or summary construct?Journal of Marketing Research26(2): 222–229.
38.
HarrisMRavivA (1991) The theory of capital structure. Journal of Finance46(1): 297–355.
39.
HellmannTPuriM (2002) Venture capital and the professionalization of start-up firms: Empirical evidence. Journal of Finance57(1): 169–197.
40.
HilmerssonM (2012) Experiential knowledge types and profiles of internationalising small and medium-sized enterprises. International Small Business Journal. Epub ahead of print, 30November2012. DOI: 10.1177/0266242612458443.
41.
HopeOKLangliJCThomasWB (2012) Agency conflicts and auditing in private firms. Working paper, University of Toronto. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1675934 (accessed 3 March 2013).
42.
HymerSH (1976) The International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Foreign Direct Investment. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
43.
IlmolaLKuusiO (2006) Filters of weak signals hinder foresight: Monitoring weak signals efficiently in corporate decision-making. Futures38(8): 908–924.
44.
InschGSMillerSR (2005) Perception of foreignness: Benefit or liability?Journal of Managerial Issues17(4): 423–438.
45.
KeDNgLWangQ (2010) Home bias in foreign investment decisions. Journal of International Business Studies41(6): 960–979.
KimJBSimunicDASteinMT. (2011) Voluntary audit and the cost of debt capital for privately held firms: Korean evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research28(2): 585–615.
48.
KostovaTZaheerS (1999) Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review24(1): 64–81.
49.
LahtiT (2012) The value-added contribution of advisors in the process of acquiring venture capitalInternational Small Business Journal. Epub ahead of print, 29October2012. DOI: 10.1177/0266242612453932.
50.
LauCMTseDKZhouN (2002) Institutional forces and organizational culture in China: Effects of change schemas, firm commitment and job satisfaction. Journal of International Business Studies33(3): 533–550.
51.
LeuzCVerrecchiaRE (2000) The economic consequences of increased disclosure. Journal of Accounting Research38(supp.): 91–124.
52.
LiJLiY (2010) Flexibility versus commitment: MNEs’ ownership strategy in China. Journal of International Business Studies41(9): 1550–1571.
53.
MeyerKE (2004) Perspectives on multinational enterprises in emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies35(4): 259–276.
54.
MeziasJM (2002) Identifying liabilities of foreignness and strategies to minimize their effects: The case of labor judgments in the United States. Strategic Management Journal22(3): 307–334.
55.
MoroAFinkMKautonenT (2012) How do banks assess entrepreneurial competence? The role of voluntary information disclosureInternational Small Business Journal. Epub ahead of print, 24December2012. DOI: 10.1177/0266242612458444.
56.
MudambiRNavarraP (2002) Institutions and international business: A theoretical view. International Business Review11(6): 635–646.
57.
NachumL (2003) Liability of foreignness in global competition? Financial service affiliates in the City of London. Strategic Management Journal24(12): 1187–1208.
58.
National Bureau of Statistics of China (2010) China Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistical Press.
59.
NewmanKL (2000) Organizational transformation during institutional upheaval. Academy of Management Review25(3): 602–619.
60.
OliverC (1991) Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review16(1): 145–179.
61.
PappuRQuesterPGCookseyRW (2007) Country image and consumer-based brand equity: Relationships and implications for international marketing. Journal of International Business Studies38(4): 726–745.
62.
ParkSHLiSTseDK (2006) Market liberalization and firm performance during China’s economic transition. Journal of International Business Studies37(1): 127–147.
63.
PengMWWangDYLJiangY (2008) An institution-based view of international business strategy: A focus on emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies39(5): 920–936.
64.
Perez-BatresLAEdenL (2008) Is there a liability of localness? How emerging market firms respond to regulatory punctuations. Journal of International Management14(3): 232–251.
65.
PetersenMARajanRG (2002) Does distance still matter? The revolution in small business lending. Journal of Finance57(6): 2533–2570.
66.
PetersenMARajanRG (1994) The benefits of lending relationships: Evidence from small business data. Journal of Finance49(1): 3–37.
67.
PetersenMARajanRG (1995) The effect of credit market competition on lending relationships. Quarterly Journal of Economics110(2): 407–443.
68.
PiotroskiJDWongTJZhangT (2008) Political incentives to suppress negative financial information: Evidence from state-controlled Chinese firms. Working paper, Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
69.
RodgersWJohnsonLW (1988) Integrating credit models using accounting information with loan officers’ decision processes. Accounting & Finance28(2): 1–22.
70.
SaparitoPChenCSapienzaH (2004) The role of relational trust in bank–small firm relationships. Academy of Management Journal47(3): 400–410.
71.
SethiDJudgeW (2009) Reappraising liabilities of foreignness within an integrated perspective of the costs and benefits of doing business abroad. International Business Review18(4): 404–416.
72.
SharmaP (2011) Country-of-origin effects in developed and emerging markets: Exploring the contrasting roles of materialism and value consciousness. Journal of International Business Studies42(2): 285–306.
73.
SpenceM (2002) Signaling in retrospect and the informational structure of markets. American Economic Review92(3): 434–459.
74.
TsengWZebregsH (2002) Foreign direct investment in China: Some lessons for other countries. International Monetary Fund Policy Discussion Paper PDP/02/3. Available at: www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/pdp/2002/pdp03.pdf (accessed 3 March 2013).
75.
UnA (2011) The advantage of foreignness in innovation. Strategic Management Journal32(11): 1232–1242.
76.
UNCTAD (2009) World Investment Report. Geneva: United Nations.
77.
UNCTAD (2010) World Investment Report. Geneva: United Nations.
78.
VarumCARochaVCB (2011) Do foreign and domestic firms behave any different during economic slowdowns?International Business Review20(1): 48–59.
79.
VerleghPWJ (2007) Home country bias in product evaluation: The complementary roles of economic and socio-psychological motives. Journal of International Business Studies38(3): 361–373.
80.
VerrecchiaR (1983) Discretionary disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics5: 179–194.
81.
VosEYehACarterS. (2007) The happy story of small business financing. Journal of Banking and Finance31(9): 2648–2672.
82.
WangXYangZ (2008) Does country-of-origin matter in the relationship between brand personality and purchase intention in emerging economies? Evidence from China’s auto industry. International Marketing Review25(4): 458–474.
83.
WuZChuaJH (2012) Second-order gender effects: The case of U.S. small business borrowing cost. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice36(3): 443–463.
84.
WuZHedgesPZhangS (2007) Effects of concentrated ownership and owner-management on small business debt financing. Journal of Small Business Management45(4): 422–437.
85.
YildizHEFeyCF (2012) The liability of foreignness reconsidered: New insights from the alternative research context of transforming economies. International Business Review21(2): 269–280.
86.
ZaheerS (1995) Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal38(2): 341–360.
87.
ZaheerSMosakowskiE (1997) The dynamics of the liability of foreignness: A global study of survival in financial services. Strategic Management Journal18(6): 439–464.
88.
ZahraSAFilatotchevI (2004) Governance of the entrepreneurial threshold firm: A knowledge-based perspective. Journal of Management Studies41(5): 885–897.
