Using predictive and effectuation logics as a framework, this research note explains how case study research was conducted to demonstrate rigour and relevance. The study involves a longitudinal cross-country case study on small and medium-sized firm growth and networks undertaken by research teams in three countries (Finland, Denmark and New Zealand) involving 33 firms. This research note outlines the implications of this research and provides valuable guidance and reflections upon opportunities for future research regarding the conduct of contextual studies in entrepreneurship without compromising validity and reliability.
BansalPCorleyK (2011) From the editors – The coming of age for qualitative research: Embracing the diversity of qualitative methods. Academy of Management Journal54(2): 233–237.
2.
ChettyS (1996) The case study method for research in small and medium-sized firms. International Small Business Journal15(1): 73–85.
3.
ChettySCampbell-HuntC (2003) Explosive international growth and problems of success amongst small to medium-sized firms. International Small Business Journal21(1): 61–81.
4.
CoadARaoR (2008) Innovation and firm growth in high-tech sectors: A quantile regression approach. Research Policy37(4): 633–648.
5.
CovielloNEJonesMV (2004) Methodological issues in international entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Venturing19(4): 485–508.
6.
DuboisAGaddeL-E (2002) Systematic combining: An abductive approach to case research. Journal of Business Research55(7): 553–560.
7.
Easterby-SmithMMalinaD (1999) Cross-cultural collaborative research: Toward reflexivity. Academy of Management Journal42(1): 76–86.
8.
EisenhardtKM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review14(4): 532–550.
9.
EisenhardtKMGraebnerME (2007) Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal50(1): 25–32.
10.
GallowayL (2011) The experiences of male gay business owners in the UK. International Small Business Journal. Epub ahead of print, 9May2011. DOI: 10.1177/0266242610391324.
11.
GibbertMRuigrokWWickiB (2008) What passes as a rigorous case study?Strategic Management Journal29(13): 1465–1474.
12.
HalinenATörnroosJ-Å (2005) Using case methods in the study of contemporary business networks. Journal of Business Research58(9): 1285–1297.
13.
HalinenASalmiAHavilaV (1999) From dyadic change to changing business networks: An analytical framework. Journal of Management Studies36(6): 779–794.
14.
IrelandRDReutzelCRWebbJW (2005) From the editors: Entrepreneurship research in AMJ: What has been published, and what might the future hold?Academy of Management Journal48(4): 556–564.
15.
JackSMoultSAndersonAR (2010) An entrepreneurial network evolving: Patterns of change. International Small Business Journal28(4): 315–337.
16.
LockettNJackSLartyJ (2012) Motivation and challenges of network formation: Entrepreneur and intermediary perspectives. International Small Business Journal. Epub ahead of print, 29June2012. DOI: 10.1177/0266242612448383.
17.
McKelvieAWiklundJ (2010) Advancing firm growth research: A focus on growth mode instead of growth rate. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice34(2): 261–288.
18.
Marschan-PiekkariRReisC (2004) Language and languages in cross-cultural interviewing. In: Marschan-PiekkariRWelchC (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research: Methods for International Business. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp.224–243.
19.
Marschan-PiekkariRWelchC (eds) (2004) Handbook of Qualitative Research: Methods for International Business. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
20.
MichailovaS (2004) Contextualising fieldwork: Reflections on conducting research in Eastern Europe. In: Marschan-PiekkariRWelchC (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research: Methods for International Business. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp.365–383.
21.
PerrenLRamM (2004) Case-study method in small business and entrepreneurial research: Mapping boundaries and perspectives. International Small Business Journal22(1): 83–101.
22.
PiekkariRWelchCPaavilainenE (2009) The case study as disciplinary convention: Evidence from international business journals. Organizational Research Methods12(3): 567–589.
23.
PrattMG (2009) For the lack of a boilerplate: Tips on writing up (and reviewing) qualitative research. Academy of Management Journal53(5): 856–862.
24.
PlummerLA (2010) Spatial dependence in entrepreneurship research: Challenges and methods. Organizational Research Methods13(1): 146–175.
25.
ReadSDewNSarasvathySDSongMWiltbankR (2009) Marketing under uncertainty: The logic of effectual approach. Journal of Marketing73(3): 1–18.
26.
RialpARialpJKnightGA (2005) The phenomenon of early internationalizing firms: What do we know after a decade (1993–2003) of scientific inquiry?International Business Review14(2): 147–166.
27.
SarasvathyS (2001) Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review26(2): 243–263.
28.
SarasvathySDewN (2005) Entrepreneurial logics for a technology of foolishness. Scandinavian Journal of Management21(4): 385–406.
29.
ShepherdDA (2003) Learning from business failure: Propositions of grief recovery for the self-employed. Academy of Management Review28(2): 318–328.
30.
ShortJCKetchenDJJrCombsJG and Ireland RD (2010) Research methods in entrepreneurship: Opportunities and challenges. Organizational Research Methods13(1): 6–15.
31.
TaylorMJackR (2012) Understanding the pace, scale and pattern of firm internationalization: An extension of the ‘born global’ concept. International Small Business Journal. Epub ahead of print, 18January2012. DOI: 10.1177/0266242611431992.
32.
TeagardenMBvon GlinowMABowenDE. (1995) Toward a theory of comparative management research: An idiographic case study of the best international human resources management project. Academy of Management Journal38(5): 1261–1287.
33.
VandeVenAH (1992) Longitudinal methods for studying the process of entrepreneurship. In: SextonDLKasandraJD (eds) The State of the Art of Entrepreneurship Research. Boston, MA: PWS Kent, pp.214–242.
34.
WrightMMarlowS (2012) Entrepreneurial activity in the venture creation and development process. International Small Business Journal30(2): 107–114.
35.
YinRK (1993) Applications of Case Study Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
36.
ZahraSA (2007) Contextualizing theory building in entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Venturing22(3): 443–452.
