This article examines how firm-based and founder-based determinants of international (as opposed to domestic) new venturing are moderated by perceived barriers to internationalization. In order to test the theoretically derived hypotheses, this article applies event history analysis to a sample of technology firms. The results show that the influence of growth orientation, international network contacts and knowledge intensity on international new venturing varies depending on the perceived financial barriers. Thus, this article provides a contingent perspective within the research field and a contrast to the quite categorical discussion regarding determinants of international new venturing and barriers to internationalization.
AcedoFJJonesMV (2007) Speed of internationalization and entrepreneurial cognition: Insights and a comparison between international new ventures, exporters and domestic firms. Journal of World Business42(3): 236–252.
2.
AidisR (2005) Institutional barriers to small- and medium-sized enterprise operations in transition countries. Small Business Economics25(4): 305–318.
3.
AllisonP (1984) Event History Analysis: Regression for Longitudinal Event Data. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
4.
AllisonP (1999) Multiple Regression: A Primer. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
5.
AndersonDRSweeneyDHWilliamsTA (1996) Statistics for Business and Economics. St Paul, MN: West Publishing Company.
6.
ArmstrongJSOvertonTS (1977) Estimating non-response bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research14(3): 396–402.
7.
ArpingSDiawKM (2008) Sunk costs, entry deterrence and financial constraints. International Journal of Industrial Organization26(2): 490–501.
8.
ArranzNDe ArroyabeJCF (2009) International process of Spanish small firms: Strategies, transactions and barriers. International Small Business Journal27(4): 420–441.
9.
AutioESapienzaHJAlmeidaJG (2000) Effects of age at entry, knowledge intensity and imitability on international growth. Academy of Management Journal43(5): 909–924.
10.
BaumJACCalabreseTSilvermanBS (2000) Don’t go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups’ performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal21(3): 267–294.
11.
BaumJRLockeEASmithKG (2001) A multidimensional model of venture growth. Academy of Management Journal44(2): 292–303.
12.
BaumMSchwensCKabstR (2009) Internationalisierung junger Technologieunternehmen: Der moderierende Einfluss der Liabilities of Foreignness [Internationalization of young technology firms: The moderating effect of Liabilities of Foreignness] Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft79(6): 87–112.
13.
BilkeyWJ (1978) An attempted integration of the literature on the export behavior of firms. Journal of International Business Studies9(1): 33–46.
14.
BloodgoodJMSapienzaHJAlmeidaJG (1996) The internationalization of high-potential U.S. ventures: Antecedents and outcomes. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice20(4): 61–76.
15.
BlossfeldHPRohwerG (1995) Techniques of Event-history Modeling. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16.
BluedornAJohnsonRCartwrightDBarringerB (1994) The interface and convergence of the strategic management and organizational environment domains. Journal of Management20(2): 201–263.
17.
BrouthersLENakosG (2005) The role of systematic market selection of small firms’ export performance. Journal of Small Business Management43(3): 363–381.
18.
BurgelOMurrayGC (2000) The international market entry choices of start-up companies in high-technology industries. Journal of International Marketing8(2): 33–62.
19.
CarpenterMAFredricksonJW (2001) Top management teams, global strategic posture and the moderating role of uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal44(3): 533–545.
20.
CarpenterMAPollockTGLearyMM (2003) Testing a model of reasoned risk-taking governance, the experience of principals and agents and global strategy in high technology IPO firms. Strategic Management Journal24(9): 803–820.
21.
CavusgilST (1984) Organizational characteristics associated with export activity. Journal of Management Studies21(1): 3–22.
22.
ChandlerGNHanksSH (1994) Market attractiveness, resource-based capabilities, venture strategies and venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing9(4): 331–349.
23.
CloningerPAOviattB (2007) Service content and the internationalization of young ventures: An empirical test. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice31(2): 233–256.
24.
CohenJCohenPWestSGAikenLS (2003) Applied Multiple Regression/correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
25.
CovielloNE (2006) The network dynamics of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies37(5): 713–731.
26.
CovielloNEMcAuleyA (1999) Internationalization and the smaller firm: A review of contemporary empirical research. Management International Review39(3): 223–256.
27.
CovielloNEJonesMV (2004) Methodological issues in international entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Venturing19(4): 485–508.
28.
CoxDR (1972) Regression models and life-tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Methodological)34(2): 187–220.
29.
DawsonJFRichterAW (2006) Probing three-way interactions in moderated multiple regression: Development and application of a slope difference test. Journal of Applied Psychology91(4): 917–926.
30.
DoernR (2009) Investigating barriers to SME growth and development in transition economies: A critique and suggestions for developing the methodology. International Small Business Journal27(3): 275–305.
31.
EisenhardtKSchoonhovenCB (1990) Organizational growth: Linking founding team, strategy, environment and growth among US semiconductor firms. Administrative Science Quarterly35(3): 504–529.
32.
EshghiA (1992) Attitude–behavior inconsistency in exporting. International Marketing Review9(3): 40–61.
33.
Fernandez-OrtizRLombardoGF (2009) Influence of the capacities of top management on the internationalization of SMEs. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development21(2): 131–154.
34.
FreemanSEdwardsRSchroderB (2006) How smaller born-global firms use networks and alliances to overcome constraints to rapid internationalization. Journal of International Marketing14(3): 33–63.
35.
GoldenBR (1992) The past is the past – or is it? The use of retrospective accounts as indicators of past strategy. Academy of Management Journal35(4): 848–60.
36.
HittMAHoskissonREKimH (1997) International diversification: Effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms. Academy of Management Journal40(4): 767–798.
37.
HoetkerG (2007) The use of logit and probit models in strategic management research: Critical issues. Strategic Management Journal28(4): 331–343.
38.
HollensteinH (2005) Determinants of international activities: Are SMEs different?Small Business Economics24(5): 431–450.
39.
HuberGPPowerDJ (1985) Retrospective reports of strategic-level managers: Guidelines for increasing their accuracy. Strategic Management Journal6(2): 171–180.
40.
IbehKIN (2003) Toward a contingency framework of export entrepreneurship: Conceptualisations and empirical evidence. Small Business Economics20(1): 49–68.
KeuppMMGassmannO (2009) The past and the future of international entrepreneurship: A review and suggestions for developing the field. Journal of Management35(3): 600–633.
43.
KnightGACavusgilST (2004) Innovation organizational capabilities and the born-global firm. Journal of International Business Studies35(2): 124–141.
44.
KnightGMadsenTKServaisP (2004) An inquiry into born-global firms in Europe and the USA. International Marketing Review21(6): 645–665.
45.
KunduSUKatzJA (2003) Born-international SMEs: Bi-level impacts of resources and intentions. Small Business Economics20(1): 25–47.
46.
LeonidouLC (1995) Empirical research on export barriers: Review, assessment and synthesis. Journal of International Marketing3(1): 29–43.
47.
LeonidouLC (2000) Barriers to export management: An organizational and internationalization analysis. Journal of International Management6(2): 1–28.
48.
LeonidouLC (2004) An analysis of the barriers hindering small business export development. Journal of Small Business Management42(3): 279–302.
49.
Lloyd-ReasonLMughanT (2002) Strategies for internationalisation within SMEs: The key role of the owner-manager. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development9(2): 120–129.
50.
LumpkinGTDessGG (1996) Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Journal21(1): 135–172.
51.
LumpkinGTDessGG (2001) Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: The moderating role of environment and industry life cycle. Journal of Business Venturing16(5): 429–451.
52.
LuoYMeziasJM (2002) Liabilities of foreignness: Concepts, constructs and consequences. Journal of International Management8(3): 217–221.
53.
LutzCHMKempRGMDijkstraSG (2010) Perceptions regarding strategic and structural entry barriers. Small Business Economics35(1): 19–33.
54.
McDougallPPOviattBMShraderRC (2003) A comparison of international and domestic new ventures. Journal of International Entrepreneurship1(1): 59–82.
55.
McNaughtonRB (2003) The number of export markets that a firm serves: Process models versus the born-global phenomenon. Journal of International Entrepreneurship1(3): 297–311.
56.
MatandaMJFreemanS (2009) Effect of perceived environmental uncertainty on exporter–importer inter-organisational relationships and export performance improvement. International Business Review18(1): 89–107.
57.
MillerCCCardinalLBGlickWH (1997) Retrospective reports in organizational research: A reexamination of recent evidence. Academy of Management Journal40(1): 189–204.
58.
MillerDShamsieJ (1996) The resource-based view of the firm in two environments: The Hollywood film studios from 1936 to 1965. Academy of Management Journal39(3): 519–543.
59.
MintzbergHRaisinghaniDTheoretA (1976) The structure of ‘unstructured’ decision processes. Administrative Science Quarterly21(2): 246–275.
60.
MorenoAMCasillasJC (2008) Entrepreneurial orientation and growth of SMEs: A causal model. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice32(3): 507–528.
61.
MudambiRZahraSA (2007) The survival of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies38(2): 333–352.
62.
NummelaNSaarenketoSPuumalainenK (2004) Global mindset: A prerequisite for successful internationalization?Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences21(1): 51–64.
63.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2007) Removing Barriers to SME Access to International Markets. Paris: OECD.
64.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2009) Top Barriers and Drivers to SME internationalisation. Report by the OECD Working Party on SMEs and Entrepreneurship. Paris: OECD.
65.
OviattBMMcDougallPP (1994) Toward a theory of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies25(1): 45–64.
66.
PodsakoffPMOrganDW (1986) Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management12(4): 531–544.
67.
PodsakoffPMMacKenzieSBLeeJYPodsakoffNP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology88(5): 879–903.
68.
PorterME (1980) Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. New York: The Free Press.
69.
PreeceSBMilesGBaetzMC (1998). Explaining the international intensity and global diversity of early-stage technology-based firms. Journal of Business Venturing14(3): 259–281.
70.
ReuberARFischerE (1997) The influence of the management team’s international experience on the internationalization behaviour of SMEs. Journal of International Business Studies28(4): 807–825.
71.
RialpARialpJKnightGA (2005) The phenomenon of early internationalizing firms: What do we know after a decade (1993–2003) of scientific inquiry?International Business Review14(2): 147–166.
72.
RobinsonKCMcDougallPP (2001) Entry barriers and new venture performance: A comparison of universal and contingency approaches. Strategic Management Journal 22(6–7): 659–685.
73.
SapienzaHJAutioEGeorgeGZahraSA (2006) A capabilities perspective on the effects of early internationalization on firm survival and growth. Academy of Management Review31(4): 914–933.
74.
SelnesFSallisS (2003) Promoting relationship learning. Journal of Marketing67(3): 80–89.
75.
ShaneSCableD (2002) Network ties, reputation and the financing of new ventures. Management Science48(3): 364–381.
76.
ShawVDarrochJ (2004) Barriers to internationalisation: A study of entrepreneurial new ventures in New Zealand. Journal of International Entrepreneurship2(4): 327–343.
77.
ShraderRCOviattBMMcDougallPP (2000) How new ventures exploit trade-offs among international risk factors: Lessons for accelerated internationalization of the 21st century. Academy of Management Journal43(6): 1227–1247.
SirmonDGHittMAIrelandRD (2007) Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box. Academy of Management Review32(1): 273–292.
80.
Suárez-OrtegaS (2003) Export barriers: Insights from small and medium-sized firms. International Small Business Journal21(4): 403–419.
81.
TanABrewerPLieschPW (2007) Before the first export decision: Internationalization readiness in the pre-export phase. International Business Review16(3): 294–309.
82.
TerjesenSO’GormanCAcsZ (2008) Intermediate mode of internationalization: New software ventures in Ireland and India. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development20(1): 89–109.
83.
TrevorCO (2001) Interactions among actual ease of movement determinants and job satisfaction in the prediction of voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal44(4): 621–683.
84.
Van WijkRAJLJansenJJPLylesMA (2009) Social capital, knowledge transfer and outcomes: Meta-analytic evidence on a moderated mediation model. In: SolomonGT (ed.) Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, Briarcliff Manor, NY: Academy of Management, 1–6.
85.
WeerawardenaJMortGSLieschPWKnightG (2007) Conceptualizing accelerated internationalization in the born global firm: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Journal of World Business42(3): 294–306.
86.
WestheadPWrightMUcbasaranD (2001) The internationalization of new and small firms: A resource-based view. Journal of Business Venturing16(4): 333–358.
87.
Yli-RenkoHAutioETonttiV (2002) Social capital, knowledge and the international growth of technology-based new firms. International Business Review11(3): 279–304.
88.
ZaheerS (1995) Overcoming the liabilities of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal38(2): 341–363.
89.
ZahraSABognerWC (1999) Technology strategy and software new ventures’ performance: Exploring the moderating effect of the competitive environment. Journal of Business Venturing15(2): 135–174.
90.
ZahraSAGeorgeG (2002) International entrepreneurship: The current status of the field and future research agenda. In: HittMAIrelandRDCampSMSextonDI (eds) Strategic Entrepreneurship: Creating a New Mindset. Oxford: Blackwell, 255–288.
91.
ZahraSAIrelandRDHittMA (2000) International expansion by new venture firms: International diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning and performance. Academy of Management Journal43(5): 925–950.
92.
ZahraSAMatherneBPCarletonJM (2003) Technological resource leveraging and the internationalization of new ventures. Journal of International Entrepreneurship1(2): 163–186.
