In response to the absence of entrepreneurial action on behalf of non-actors, micro-oriented scholars typically tend to refuse to allocate entrepreneurial capacities to the ‘others’ of entrepreneurship. However, in contesting this explanatory practice, macro-oriented scholars counter that ‘others’ do not lack power but opportunity. This article suggests how recurrent dualisms may be fruitfully surpassed within a conceptual framework that accommodates the ontological intuitions of both theorizing tendencies. Guarding against the temptation to deny the existence of either unexercised powers or unexploited opportunities not only allows us to resist the seduction of dualisms, but also allows for the emergence of an expanded worldview that enables a more dynamic conceptualization of the entrepreneurship phenomenon. The analysis closes by recommending directions for meta-theoretical research aiming at the identification of factors that may be hindering entrepreneurship scholarship from cognizance of realist (and realistic) insights.
AldrichHE (2005) Entrepreneurship. In: SmelserNJSwedbergR (eds) The Handbook of Economic Sociology (2nd edn). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 451–477.
3.
AlvarezSA (2008) Introduction to creativity, imagination, and opportunities. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal2(1): 53–55.
4.
AyerAJ (2001[1936]) Language, Truth and Logic. London: Penguin.
5.
AyersMR (1968) The Refutation of Determinism. London: Methuen.
6.
BaronRA (1998) Cognitive mechanisms in entrepreneurship: Why and when entrepreneurs think differently than other people. Journal of Business Venturing13(4): 275–294.
7.
BaronRA (2004) The cognitive perspective: A valuable tool for answering entrepreneurship’s basic ‘why’ questions. Journal of Business Venturing19(2): 221–239.
8.
BaronRA (2007) Behavioral and cognitive factors in entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal1–2 (1): 167–182.
9.
BaronRAWardTB (2004) Expanding entrepreneurial cognition’s toolbox: Potential contributions from the field of cognitive science. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice28(6): 553–573.
10.
BaumJRFreseMBaronRA (2007) The Psychology of Entrepreneurship. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11.
BhaskarR (1978) A Realist Theory of Science. Brighton: Harvester Press.
12.
BlackburnRRamM (2006) Fix or fixation? The contributions and limitations of entrepreneurship and small firms to combating social exclusion. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development18 (1): 73–89.
13.
BlackburnRKovalainenA (2009) Researching small firms and entrepreneurship: Past, present and future. International Journal of Management Reviews11(2): 127–148.
14.
BoettkePJCoyneCJDavisJGualaFMarcianoARundeJSchabasM (2006) Where economics and philosophy meet: Review of theElgar Companion to Economics and Philosophy with responses from the authors. The Economic Journal116 (1): 306–325.
15.
BrockhausRH (1982) The psychology of the entrepreneur. In: KentCASextonDLVesperKH (eds) Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 39–57.
16.
BurtR (1992) Structural Holes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17.
BusenitzLWBarneyJB (1997) Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations. Journal of Business Venturing12: 9–30.
18.
CassonM (2003[1982]) The Entrepreneur: An Economic Theory (2nd edn). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
19.
CollinsOFMooreDG (1964) The Enterprising Man. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press.
20.
CooperA (2003) Entrepreneurship: The past, the present, the future. In: AcsZJAudretschDB (eds) Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research. New York: Springer, 21–34.
21.
CopeJ (2005) Researching entrepreneurship through phenomenological inquiry: Philosophical and methodological issues. International Small Business Journal23(2): 159–183.
22.
CyertRMMarchJG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
23.
DrakopoulouSDAndersonAR (2007) Mumpsimus and the mything of the individualistic entrepreneur. International Small Business Journal25(4): 341–360.
24.
FisherJLKochJV (2008) Born Not Made: The Entrepreneurial Personality. London: Praeger.
25.
GartnerWB (1985) A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of new venture creation. Academy of Management Review10(4): 696–706.
26.
GartnerWB (1989a) ‘Who is an entrepreneur?’ is the wrong question. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice13(4): 47–68.
27.
GartnerWB (1989b) Some suggestions for research on entrepreneurial traits and characteristics. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice14(1): 27–37.
28.
GartnerWB (1993) Words lead to deeds: Towards an organizational emergence vocabulary. Journal of Business Venturing8(3): 231–239.
29.
GartnerWB (1995) Aspects of organizational emergence. In: BullIThomasHWillardG (eds) Entrepreneurship: Perspectives on Theory Building. Oxford: Pergamon, 67–86.
30.
GartnerWB (2001) Is there an elephant in entrepreneurship? Blind assumptions in theory development. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice25(4): 27–39.
31.
GartnerWB (2008) Variations in entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics31(4): 351–361.
32.
GartnerWB (2010) A new path to the waterfall: A narrative on a use of entrepreneurial narrative. International Small Business Journal28 (1): 6–19.
33.
GartnerWBCarterNMHillsGE (2003) The language of opportunity. In: SteyaertCHjorthD (eds) New Movements in Entrepreneurship. London: Edward Elgar, 103–124.
34.
GranovetterMS (1973) The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology78(6): 1360–1380.
35.
GrantRPerrenW (2002) Small business and entrepreneurial research: Meta-theories, paradigms and prejudices. International Small Business Journal20(2): 185–211.
36.
HattenTS (1997) Small Business: Entrepreneurship and Beyond. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
37.
HayekF (1945) The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review35(4): 519–530.
38.
HempelCG (1965) Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. New York: The Free Press.
39.
HempelCGOppenheimP (1948) Studies in the logic of explanation. Philosophy of Science15(2): 135–175.
40.
HerbaneB (2010) Small business research: Time for a crisis-based view. International Small Business Journal28(1): 43–64.
41.
HeskethAFleetwoodS (2006) Beyond measuring the human resources management–organizational performance link: Applying critical realist meta-theory. Organization13(5): 677–699.
42.
HolmquistC (2003) Is the medium really the message? Moving perspective from the entrepreneurial actor to the entrepreneurial action. In SteyaertCHjorthD (eds) New Movements in Entrepreneurship. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 73–85.
43.
HumeD (1958[1748]) An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. LaSalle, IL: Open Court Press.
44.
JohnsonW (2009) So what or so everything: Bringing behavior genetics to entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Venturing24(1): 23–26.
45.
KirznerI (1973) Competition and Entrepreneurship. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
46.
KopplRMinnitiM (2003) Market processes and entrepreneurial studies. In: AcsZJAudretschDB (eds) Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research. New York: Springer, 81–102.
47.
KruegerNF (2000) The cognitive infrastructure of opportunity emergence. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice24(3): 5–23.
48.
KruegerNF (2003) The cognitive psychology of entrepreneurship. In AcsZJAudretschDB (eds) Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research. New York: Springer, 105–140.
49.
KruegerNF (2007) What lies beneath? The experiential essence of entrepreneurial thinking. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice31(1): 123–138.
50.
LawsonT (1997) Economics and Reality. London: Routledge.
51.
LawsonT (1999) Developments in economics as social realist theory. In: FleetwoodS (ed.) Critical Realism in Economics: Development and Debate. New York: Routledge, 3–20.
LawsonT (2003b) Institutionalism: On the need to firm up notions of social structure and the human subject. Journal of Economic Issues37(1): 175–207.
54.
LawsonT (2009) Ontology and Economics: Tony Lawson and his Critics. London: Routledge.
55.
McClellandDC (1961) The Achieving Society. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
56.
McMullenJSShepherdDA (2006) Entrepreneurial action and the role of uncertainty in the theory of the entrepreneur. Academy of Management Review31(1): 132–152.
57.
MakiU (2001) The Economic World View: Studies in the Ontology of Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
58.
MillJS (1970[1843]) A System of Logic. London: Longman.
59.
MinerJBRajuNS (2004) Risk propensity differences between managers and entrepreneurs and between low- and high-growth entrepreneurs: A reply in a more conservative vein. Journal of Applied Psychology89(1): 3–13.
60.
MitchellRKBusenitzLWBirdBGaglioCMMcMullenJSMorseEASmithJB (2007) The central question in entrepreneurial cognition research. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice31(1): 1–27.
61.
NagelT (1986) The View from Nowhere. New York: Oxford University Press.
62.
NicolaouNShaneS (2009) Can genetic factors influence the likelihood of engaging in entrepreneurial activity?Journal of Business Venturing24(1): 1–22.
63.
NicolaouNShaneSCherkasLHunkinJSpectorTD (2008a) Is the tendency to engage in entrepreneurship genetic?Management Science54(1): 167–179.
64.
NicolaouNShaneSCherkasLSpectorTD (2008b) The influence of sensation seeking in the heritability of entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal2(1): 7–21.
65.
RamoglouS (2008) The question we ought to ask: ‘Who is the non-entrepreneur?’. Proceedings of the Academy of Management.
66.
RamoglouS (2009) In the shadow of entrepreneurs: Taking seriously the ‘others’ of entrepreneurship. Paper presented at the 25th EGOS Colloquium.
67.
RundeJ (2002) Filling in the background. Journal of Economic Methodology9(1): 11–30.
68.
SarasvathySDVenkataramanS (2011) Entrepreneurship as method: Open questions for an entrepreneurial future. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice35(1): 113–135.
69.
SchumpeterJA (1983[1934]) The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
70.
ScottRW (2001) Institutions and Organizations (2nd edn). London: Sage.
71.
SeoMCreedWED (2002) Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Academy of Management Review27(2): 222–247.
72.
ShaneS (2000) Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science11(4): 448–469.
73.
ShaneS (2003) A General Theory of Entrepreneurship: The Individual–Opportunity Nexus. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
74.
ShaneS (2010) Born Entrepreneurs, Born Leaders: How Your Genes Affect Your Work Life. New York: Oxford University Press.
75.
ShaneSVenkataramanS (2000) The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review25(1): 217–226.
76.
ShaneSEckhardtJ (2003) The individual–opportunity nexus. In: AcsZJAudretschDB (eds) Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research. New York: Springer, 161–191.
77.
SimonM (2005) Cognitive biases and venture formation. In: HittMAIrelandRD (eds) The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Management: Entrepreneurship (2nd edn). Oxford: Blackwell, 32–36.
78.
SmithR (2011) Review of Scott Shane’s ‘Born entrepreneurs, born leaders: How your genes affect your work life’. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation12(1): 77–77.
79.
StevensonHHJarilloCJ (1990) A paradigm of entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial management. Strategic Management Journal11(4): 17–27.
80.
StewartWHRothPL (2001) Risk propensity differences between entrepreneurs and managers: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology86(1): 145–153.
81.
StewartWHRothPL (2007) A meta-analysis of achievement motivation differences between entrepreneurs and managers. Journal of Small Business Management45(4): 401–421.
82.
SteyaertC (2007) ‘Entrepreneuring’ as a conceptual attractor? A review of process theories in 20 years of entrepreneurship studies. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development19(6): 453–477.
83.
ThompsonPJones-EvansDKwongCCY (2010) Education and entrepreneurial activity: A comparison of white and South Asian men. International Small Business Journal28(2): 147–162.
84.
ThorntonPH (1999) The sociology of entrepreneurship. Annual Review of Sociology25(1): 19–46.
85.
TownsendDMBusenitzLWArthursJD (2010) To start or not to start: Outcome and ability expectations in the decision to start a new venture. Journal of Business Venturing25(2): 192–202.
86.
TsoukasH (2005) Complex Knowledge: Studies in Organizational Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
87.
VenkataramanS (1997) The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research. In KatzJA (ed.) Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence, and Growth, vol. 3. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 119–138.
88.
Von MisesL (1963) Human Action: A Treatise on Economics (3rd edn). Chicago, IL: Contemporary Books.
89.
WalkerEBrownA (2004) What success factors are important to small business owners?International Small Business Journal22(6): 577–594.
WittgensteinL (1969) On Certainty. Oxford: Blackwell.
92.
WrightM (2001) Creating and growing wealth: Sue Birley on entrepreneurship and wealth creation. Academy of Management Executive15(1): 37–39.
93.
XhenetiMBlackburnR (2011) Small business and entrepreneurship: An analysis of publications and implications for the development of the field. In: CassellCLeeB (eds) Challenges and Controversies in Management Research. New York: Routledge, 367–388.
94.
ZyglidopoulosSCFlemingPJRothenbergS (2009) Rationalization, overcompensation and the escalation of corruption in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics84(1): 65–73.
