This article uses a survey of new businesses for three regions of England – Buckinghamshire, Shropshire and Tees Valley – and focuses on the effect of liquidity constraints experienced within the first year of trading on firm growth (measured using employment) and ‘partial survival’ (the probability of remaining in activity). We control for a range of firm characteristics, management traits and strategy variables. The empirical framework adopted allows for sample censoring arising from firm exit. Fewer firms in the less wealthy area reported liquidity constraints. Our results suggest that the experience of the first year is critical to the survival and subsequent resilience of the firm but has no effect on growth.
AghionPFallyTScarpettaS (2007) Credit constraints as a barrier to the entry and post-entry growth of firms. Economic Policy22: 731–779.
2.
AngeliniPGeneraleA (2009) Firm size distribution: Do financial constraints explain it all? Evidence from Survey Data. Bank of Italy. Temi di Discussione (Working Paper) No. 549.
3.
BecchettiLTrovatoG (2002) The determinants of growth for small and medium sized firms. The role of the availability of external finance. Small Business Economics19: 291–306.
4.
BennettRJRobsonPJA (2003) Changing use of external business advice and government support during the 1990s. Regional Studies37: 795–811.
5.
BerryAPerrenL (2001) The role of non-executive directors in UK SMEs. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development8: 159–173.
6.
BhideA (2000) The Origin and Evolution of New Businesses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7.
BlackJDe MezaDJeffreysD (1996) House prices, the supply of collateral and the enterprise economy. The Economic Journal106: 60–75.
8.
BlanchflowerDGOswaldAJStutzerA (2001) Latent entrepreneurship across nations. EuropeanEconomic Review45: 680–691.
9.
BlanchflowerDGOswaldAJ (1998) What makes an entrepreneur?Journal of Labor Economics16: 26–60.
10.
BlanchflowerDShadforthC (2007) Entrepreneurship in the UK. IZA DP No. 2818.
11.
BritoPMelloA (1995) Financial constraints and firm post-entry performance. International Journal of Industrial Organisation13: 543–565.
12.
BruderlJSchusslerR (1990) Organizational mortality: The liabilities of newness and adolescence. Administrative Science Quarterly35: 530–547.
13.
BurkeAEFitzroyFRNolanMA (2000) When less in more: Distinguishing between entrepreneurial choice and performance. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics62: 565–587.
14.
CapellerasJLRabetinoR (2008) Individual, organizational and environmental determinants of new firm employment growth: Evidence from Latin America. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal4: 79–99.
15.
CarpenterREPetersenBC (2002) Is the growth of small firms constrained by internal finance?The Review of Economics and Statistics84: 298–309.
16.
CarrollGRHannanMT (2000) The Demography of Corporations and Industries. Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
17.
CowlingMMitchellP (1997) The evolution of UK self employment: A study of government policy and the role of the macro-economy. Manchester School64(4): 427–442.
18.
CressyRC (1996) Are business start-ups debt-rationed?Economic Journal106: 1253–1270.
19.
CressyRC (2006) Why do most firms die young?Small Business Economics26: 103–116.
20.
DisneyRHaskelJHedenY (2003) Entry, exit and establishment survival in UK manufacturing. Journal of Industrial Economics51: 91–112.
21.
DruckerPF (1985) Innovation and Entrepreneurship:Practice and Principles. New York: Harper Collins.
22.
Easterby-SmithMThorpeRLoweA (2002) Management Research: An Introduction, 2nd edn.London: SAGE.
23.
EvansDS (1987) Tests of alternative theories of firm growth. Journal of Political Economy95: 657–674.
24.
EvansDSJovanovicB (1989) An estimated model of entrepreneurial choice under liquidity constraints. Journal of Political Economy97: 808–827.
25.
Foreman-PeckJMakepeaceGMorganG (2006) Growth and profitability of small and medium-sized enterprises: Some Welsh evidence. Regional Studies40: 307–319.
26.
ForthJMcNabbR (2008) Workplace performance: A comparison of subjective and objective measures in the 2004 Workplace Employment Relations Survey. Industrial Relations Journal39(2): 104–123.
27.
FraserS (2004) Finance for small and medium sized enterprises: A report on the 2004 UK survey of SME finances. University of Warwick.
28.
FraserSGreeneFJMoleKF (2007) Systematic biases in self-reported data: The role of ‘anchoring’. British Journal of Management18: 192–208.
29.
GimenoJFoltaTBCooperACWooCY (1997) Survival of the fittest? Entrepreneurial human capital and the persistence of underperforming firms. Administrative Science Quarterly42: 750–783.
30.
GreeneFJMoleKFStoreyDJ (2004) Does more mean worse: UK enterprise policy over three decades. Urban Studies41(7): 1207–1228.
31.
GreeneFJMoleKFStoreyDJ (2008) Three Decades of Enterprise Culture: Entrepreneurship, Economic Regeneration and Public Policy. London: Palgrave.
32.
GreeneW (2000) Econometric Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
33.
HarrisRSiegelDSWrightM (2005) Assessing the impact of management buyouts on economic efficiency: Plant-level evidence from the United Kingdom. Review of Economics and Statistics87: 148–153.
34.
HartMMcGuinnessS (2003) Small firm growth in the UK regions 1994–1997: Towards an explanatory framework. Regional Studies37: 109–122.
35.
HeckmanJ (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica47: 153–161.
36.
Holtz-EakinDJoulfaianDRosenHS (1994) Sticking it out: Entrepreneurial survival and liquidity constraints. Journal of Political Economy102: 53–75.
37.
HurstELusardiA (2004) Liquidity constraints, household wealth and entrepreneurship. Journal of Political Economy112: 319–347.
38.
JovanovicB (1982) Selection and the evolution of industry. Econometrica50: 649–670.
39.
KangasharjuAPekkalaS (2002) The role of education in self-employment success in Finland. Growth and Change33: 216–237.
40.
KeebleDWalkerS (1994) New firms, small firms and dead firms: Spatial patterns and determinants in the United Kingdom. Regional Studies28: 411–427.
41.
KonYStoreyDJ (2003) A theory of discouraged borrowers. Small Business Economics21: 37–49.
42.
LindhTOhlssonH (1996) Self-employment and windfall gains: Evidence from the Swedish lottery. The Economic Journal106: 1515–1526.
43.
LoveJHRoperS (2005) Innovation, productivity and growth: An analysis of Irish data. Presented at the EARIE Annual Congress, Porto.
44.
MarlowSPattonD (2005) All credit to men? Entrepreneurship, finance, and gender. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice29: 717–735.
45.
McGuinnessSHartM (2004) Mixing the grant cocktail: Towards an understanding of the outcomes of financial support to small firms. Environment and Planning C22: 841–857.
46.
MoleKFBramleyG (2006) Making policy choices in non-financial business support: An international comparison. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy24: 885–908.
47.
MoleKFMoleMC (2010) Entrepreneurship as the structuration of individual and opportunity: A response using a critical realist perspective. Journal of Business Venturing25: 230–237.
48.
MoleKFHartMRoperSSaalD (2009) Assessing the effectiveness of business support services in England: Evidence from a theory based evaluation. International Small Business Journal27: 557–582.
49.
MustarPRenaultMColomboMGPivaEFontesMLockettAWrightMClarysseBMorayN (2006) Conceptualising the heterogeneity of research-based spin-offs: A multi-dimensional taxonomy. Research Policy35: 289–308.
50.
NorthDSmallboneD (2000) The innovativeness and growth of rural SMEs during the 1990s. Regional Studies34: 145–157.
51.
PfeifferFRiezeF (2000) Business start-ups by the unemployed: An econometric analysis based on firm data. Labour Economics7: 629–663.
52.
PhillipsBKirchoffB (1989) Formation, growth and survival: Small firm dynamics in the US economy. Small Business Economics1: 65–74.
53.
ReidGCSmithJA (2000) What makes a new business start-up successful?Small Business Economics14: 165–182.
54.
RomeroISantosFJ (2007) Firm size and regional linkages: A typology of manufacturing establishments in Southern Spain. Regional Studies41: 571–584.
55.
RoperSHewitt-DundasN (2001) Grant assistance and small firm development in Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. Scottish Journal of Political Economy48: 99–117.
56.
RoperSHewitt-DundasN (2008) Innovation persistence: Survey and case-study evidence. Research Policy37: 149–162.
57.
RosaPCarterSHamiltonD (1996) Gender as a determinant of small business performance: Insights from a British study. Small Business Economics8: 463–478.
58.
SaridakisGStoreyD (2010) Forecasting business start-ups in Britain. Unpublished document, Department for Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform.
59.
SaridakisGStoreyD (2009) UK SMEs and bank finance. In: GiannolaAD’AngeloG (eds) Financing Enterprises: Basel 2 and the Changes Induced in Knowledge, Competence and Bank-Enterprise Relationship. Naples: Liguori Editore, 87–102.
60.
SaridakisGMoleKStoreyD (2008) New small firm survival in England. Empirica35: 25–39.
61.
ScellatoGUghettoE (2010) The Basel II reform and the provision of finance for R&D activities in SMEs: An analysis of a sample of Italian companies. International Small Business Journal28: 65–89.
62.
StiglitzJEWeissA (1981) Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information. The American Economic Review71: 393–410.
63.
StinchcombeAL (1965) Social structure and organizations. In: MarchJG (ed.) Handbook of Organizations. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally, 142–193.
64.
StoreyDJ (1994) Understanding the Small Business Sector. London: Routledge.
65.
StoreyDJWynarczykP (1996) The survival and non-survival of micro firms in the UK. Review of Industrial Organization11: 211–229.
66.
ThwaitesAWynarczykP (1996) The economic performance of innovative small firms in the South East region and elsewhere in the UK. Regional Studies30: 135–149.
67.
YasudaT (2005) Firm growth, size, age and behavior in Japanese manufacturing. Small Business Economics24: 1–15.
