Education is argued to be an important driver of the decision to start a business. However, the measurement of its influence is difficult since it is considered to be an endogenous variable. This study accounts for this endogeneity by using an instrumental variables approach and a dataset of more than 10,000 individuals from 27 European countries and the USA. The effect of education on the decision to become self-employed is found to be strongly positive, much higher than the estimated effect in case no instrumental variables are used. That is, the higher the respondent’s level of education, the greater the likelihood that they will start a business. Implications for entrepreneurship research and practice are discussed.
AmemiyaT (1978) The estimation of a simultaneous equation generalized probit model. Econometrica46(5): 1193–1205.
2.
AmitRMuellerECockburnI (1995) Opportunity costs and entrepreneurial activity. Journal of Business Venturing10(2): 95–106.
3.
AngristJDKruegerAB (1991) Does compulsory school attendance affect schooling and earnings?Quarterly Journal of Economics106(4): 979–1014.
4.
AshenfelterOHarmonCOosterbeekH (1999) A review of estimates of the schooling/earnings relationship, with tests for publication bias. Labour Economics6(4): 453–470.
5.
AudretschDBThurikAR (2001) What is new about the new economy: Sources of growth in the managed and entrepreneurial economies. Industrial and Corporate Change10(1): 267–315.
6.
BegleyTMTanWL (2001) The socio-cultural environment for entrepreneurship: A comparison between East Asian and Anglo-Saxon Countries. Journal of International Business Studies32(3): 537–553.
7.
BlackburnMLNeumarkD (1993) Omitted-ability bias and the increase in the return to schooling. Journal of Labor Economics11(3): 521–544.
8.
BlockJKoellingerP (2009) I can’t get no satisfaction: Necessity entrepreneurship and procedural utility. Kyklos62(2): 191–209.
9.
BlockJWagnerM (2010) Necessity and opportunity entrepreneurs in Germany: Characteristics and earnings differentials. Schmalenbach Business Review62(2): 154–174.
10.
BoundJJaegerDABakerRM (1995) Problems with instrumental variables estimation when the correlation between the instruments and the endogenous explanatory variable is weak. Journal of the American Statistical Association90(430): 443–450.
11.
CardD (1999) The causal effect of education on earnings. In: AshenfelterOCardD (eds) Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 3. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1801–1863.
12.
DavidssonPHonigB (2003) The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing18(3): 301–331.
13.
DeatonAS (2009) Instruments of development: Randomization in the tropics, and the search for the elusive keys to economic development. NBER Working Paper 14690.
14.
European Commission (2003) Green Paper: Entrepreneurship in Europe. Brussels: Directorate General of Enterprise and Industry.
15.
EvansDSJovanovicB (1989) An estimated model of entrepreneurial choice under liquidity constraints. Journal of Political Economy97(4): 808–827.
16.
GimenoJFoltaTBCooperACWooCY (1997) Survival of the fittest? Entrepreneurial human capital and the persistence of underperforming firms. Administrative Science Quarterly42(4): 750–783.
17.
GrilichesZ (1977) Estimating the returns to schooling: Some econometric problems. Econometrica45(1): 1–22.
18.
GrilichesZMasonWM (1972) Education, income, and ability. Journal of Political Economy80(3): S74–S103.
19.
GriloIIrigoyenJM (2006) Entrepreneurship in the EU: To wish and not to be. Small Business Economics26(4): 305–318.
20.
GriloIThurikAR (2005) Latent and actual entrepreneurship in Europe and the US: Some recent developments. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal1(4): 441–459.
21.
GriloIThurikAR (2008) Determinants of entrepreneurial engagement levels in Europe and the US. Industrial and Corporate Change17(6): 1113–1145.
22.
HeckmanJJNavarro-LozanoS (2004) Using matching, instrumental variables, and control functions to estimate economic choice models. Review of Economics and Statistics86(1): 30–57.
23.
HeckmanJJUrzuaS (2009) Comparing IV with structural models: What simple IV can and cannot identify. NBER Working Paper 14706.
24.
HoogerheideLFKleibergenFVan DijkHK (2007) Natural conjugate priors for the instrumental variables regression model applied to the Angrist–Krueger data. Journal of Econometrics138(1): 63–103.
25.
KautonenTDownSWelterFVainioPPalmroosJAlthoffK. (2010) ‘Involuntary self-employment’ as a public policy issue: A cross-country European review. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research16(2): 112–129.
26.
KennedyP (2008) A Guide to Econometrics (6th edn) Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
27.
LeAT (1999) Empirical studies of self-employment. Journal of Economic Surveys13(4): 381–416.
28.
LeeLF (1992) Amemiya’s generalized least squares and tests of overidentification in simultaneous equation models with qualitative or limited dependent variables. Econometric Review11(3): 319–328.
29.
LévesqueMShepherdDADouglasEJ (2002) Employment or self-employment: A dynamic utility-maximizing model. Journal of Business Venturing17(3): 189–210.
30.
LinkCR (1973) The quantity and quality of education and their influence on earnings: The case of chemical engineers. Review of Economics and Statistics55(2): 241–247.
31.
NeweyWK (1987) Efficient estimation of limited dependent variable models with endogeneous explanatory variables. Journal of Econometrics36(3): 231–250.
32.
OosterbeekHVan PraagMIjsselsteinA (2010) The impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurship skills and motivation. European Economic Review54(3): 442–454.
33.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2009) Education at a Glance. Paris: OECD.
34.
ParkerSC (2009) The Economics of Entrepreneurship (2nd edn). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35.
ParkerSCVan PraagCM (2006) Schooling, capital constraints and entrepreneurial performance: The endogenous triangle. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics24(4): 416–431.
36.
RoperSScottJM (2009) Perceived financial barriers and the start-up decision. An econometric analysis of gender differences using GEM data. International Small Business Journal27(2): 149–171.
37.
SenaVScottJRoperS (2010) Gender, borrowing patterns and self-employment: Some evidence for England. Small Business Economics, epub 13 March.
38.
SiowA (1984) Occupational choice under uncertainty. Econometrica52(3): 631–645.
ThurikARCarreeMAVan StelAAudretschDB (2008) Does self-employment reduce unemployment?Journal of Business Venturing23(6): 673–686.
41.
Van der SluisJVan PraagCMVijverbergW (2008) Education and entrepreneurship selection and performance: A review of the empirical literature. Journal of Economic Surveys22(5): 795–841.
42.
Van der ZwanPThurikARGriloI (2010) The entrepreneurial ladder and its determinants. Applied Economics42(17): 2183–2191.
43.
Van PraagCMVan der SluisJ (2004) Economic returns to education for entrepreneurs: The development of a neglected child in the family of economics of education?Swedish Economic Policy Review11(2): 183–226.
44.
Von GraevenitzGHarhoffDWeberR (2010) The effects of entrepreneurship education. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization76(1): 90–112.
45.
WagnerJ (2007) What a difference a Y makes: Female and male nascent entrepreneurs in Germany. Small Business Economics28(1): 1–21.
46.
WebbinkD (2005) Causal effects in education. Journal of Economic Surveys19(4): 535–560.
47.
YatchewAGrilichesZ (1985) Specification error in Probit models. Review of Economics and Statistics67(1): 134–139.
48.
ZarkinGA (1985) Occupational choice: An application to the market for public school teachers. Quarterly Journal of Economics100(2): 409–446.
