The credit crisis has led to tightened bank so lending to smaller firms it is no surprise that the debate concerning the re-introduction of regional stock exchanges into the UK has received fresh impetus. This article analyses all UK based Initial Public Offerings (IPOs) on the Alternative Investment Market (AIM) to contribute to this debate and the small firm funding literature. The results indicate that London has dominated IPO activity on the AIM; this reflects the dynamism of this local economy rather than differential funding across the regions. A more fruitful approach than developing regional stock exchanges might be for the current stock exchange to develop stronger links with small business advice and networking organizations working with these existing mechanism/structures to enhance the supply of equity and debt finance to suitable firms much earlier in their life-cycles.
AcsZArmingtonC (2004a) Employment growth and entrepreneurial activity in cities. Regional Studies38(8): 911–927.
2.
AcsZArmingtonC (2004b) The impact of geographic differences in human capital on service firm formation rates. Journal of Urban Economics56(2): 244–278.
3.
AcsZStoreyD (2004) Introduction: Entrepreneurship and economic development. Regional Studies38(8): 871–877.
4.
Anyadike-DanesMHartM (2006) The impact of sector, specialisation, and space on business birth rates in the United Kingdom: A challenge for policy?Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy24(6): 815–826.
5.
Anyadike-DanesMHartMO’ReillyM (2005) Watch that space! The county hierarchy in firm births and deaths in the UK, 1980–1999. Small Business Economics25(3): 273–292.
6.
ArmingtonCAcsZ (2002) The determinants of regional variation in new firm formation. Regional Studies36(1): 33–45.
7.
AvdeitchikovaS (2009) False expectations: Reconsidering the role of informal venture capital in closing the regional equity gap. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development21(2): 99–131.
8.
Bank of England (2001) Finance for Small Firms: An Eighth Report. London: Bank of England.
9.
Bank of England (2003) Finance for Small Firms: A Tenth Report. London: Bank of England.
10.
BrauJFrancisBKohersN (2003) The choice of IPO versus takeover: Empirical evidence. The Journal of Business76(4): 583–612.
11.
ChemmanurTJHeSNandyD (2009) The going public decision and the product market. The Review of Financial Studies: doi:10.1093/rfs/hhp098.
12.
ChristensenJL (2007) The development of geographical specialization of venture capital. European Planning Studies15(6): 817–833.
13.
CicconeAHallRE (1996) Productivity and the density of economic activity. The American Economic Review86(1): 54–70.
14.
CovalJDMoskowitzTJ (1999) Home bias at home: Local equity preference in domestic portfolios. The Journal of Finance54(6): 2045–2073.
15.
CummingD (2006) Adverse selection and capital structure: Evidence from venture capital. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice30(2): 155–183.
16.
FischerC (2000) Why do companies go public?Empirical evidence from Germany’s Neuer market. Working Paper, Munich School of Management, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich, Munich.
17.
FotopoulosGSpenceN (2001) Regional variations of firm births, deaths, and growth patterns in the UK, 1980–1991. Growth and Change32(2): 151–173.
18.
FrankeNGruberMHarhoffDHenkelJ (2006) What you are is what you like – similarity biases in venture capitalists’ evaluation of start-up teams. Journal of Business Venturing21(6): 802–826.
19.
FraserS (2005) Finance for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises: A Report on the 2004 UK Survey of SME Finances. Warwick Business School.
20.
FritschMSchilderD (2007) Is there a regional equity gap for innovative start-ups? The case of Germany, In: DowlingMSchmudeJvon Knyphausen-AufsessD (eds) Entrepreneurship in Europe: New Perspectives. Cheltenham: Elgar, 200–213.
21.
GarofoliG (1994) New firm formation and regional development: The Italian case. Regional Studies28(4): 381–393.
22.
GriffithTLYamPJSubramaniamS (2007) Silicon Valley’s ‘one-hour’ distance rule and managing return on location. Venture Capital9(2): 85–106.
23.
GrinblattMKeloharjuM (2001) How distance, language, and culture influence stockholdings and trades. The Journal of Finance56(3): 1053–1073.
24.
HM Treasury (2003a) Bridging the Finance Gap: A Consultation on Improving Access to Growth Capital for Small Businesses. London: HM Treasury.
25.
HM Treasury (2003b) Bridging the Finance Gap: Next Steps in Improving Access to Growth Capital for Small Businesses. London: HM Treasury.
26.
HubermanG (2001) Familiarity breeds investment. Review of Financial Studies14(3): 659–680.
27.
HugginsREmlyn-JonesNDayJ (2003) Regional stock exchanges: A viable option for Wales and other UK regions?Cardiff: Robert Huggins Associates.
28.
IvashinaVScharfsteinD (2009) Bank lending during the financial crisis of 2008. Journal of Financial Economics, DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2009.12.001
29.
Jones-EvansDThompsonP (2009) The spatial dispersion of informal investment at a regional level: Evidence from the UK. European Planning Studies17(5): 659–675.
30.
KlaggeBMartinR (2005) Decentralized versus centralized financial systems: Is there a case for local capital markets?Journal of Economic Geography5(4): 387–421.
31.
LernerJ (1994) Venture capitalists and the decision to go public. Journal of Financial Economics35(3): 293–316.
32.
LowryM (2003) Why does IPO volume fluctuate so much?Journal of Financial Economics67(1): 3–40.
33.
MacMillan Committee (1931) Report of the Committee on Finance and Industry. Cmnd 3897, London: HMSO.
34.
MartinRL (1992) Financing regional enterprise: The role of the venture capital market, In: TownsendPMartinRL (eds) Regional Development in Transition: The British Isles in the 1990s. London: Jessica Kingley, 161–171.
35.
MartinRLBerndtCKlaggeBSunleyP (2005) Spatial proximity effects and regional equity gaps in the venture capital market: Evidence from Germany and the UK. Environment and Planning A37(7):1207–1231.
36.
MartinRLBerndtCKlaggeBSunleyPHertenS (2003) Regional Venture Capital Policy in Germany and the UK. London and Berlin: Anglo-German Foundation.
37.
MasonCMHarrisonRT (1991) Venture capital, the equity gap and the North-South divide in the UK. In: GreenM (eds) Venture Capital: International Comparisons. London: Routledge, 202–247.
38.
MasonCHarrisonRT (1992) The supply of equity finance in the UK: A strategy for closing the equity gap. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development4(4): 357–380.
39.
MasonCHarrisonRT (2002) The geography of venture capital investment in the UK. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers27(4): 427–451.
40.
MasonCPierrakisY (2009) Venture capital, the regions and public policy: The United Kingdom since the post-2000 technology crash. Working paper 09-02, University of Strathclyde, Glosgow.
41.
MuraniFToschiL (2010) Assessing The Impact of Public Venture Capital Programs in the United Kingdom: Do Regional Characteristics Matter? Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1539384
42.
OkamuroHKobayashiN (2006) The impact of regional factors on the start-up ratio in Japan. Journal of Small Business Management44(2): 310–313.
43.
PollardJS (2003) Small firm finance and economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography3(4): 429–452.
44.
RitterJRWelchI (2002) A review of IPO activity, pricing, and allocations. The Journal of Finance57(2): 1795–1828.
45.
RoperS (1998) Plant size and industry-mix effects on UK regional productivity, wage costs and operational surplus. Regional Studies32(4): 325–332.
46.
RoperSLoveJHAshcroftBDunlopS (2000) Industry and location effects on UK plants’ innovation propensity. The Annals of Regional Science34(4): 489–502.
47.
ShenYPWeiP (2007) Why do companies choose to go IPOs? New results using data from Taiwan. Journal of Economics and Finance31(3): 359–367.
48.
ShaneSCableD (2002) Social relationships and the financing of new ventures. Management Science48(3): 364–381.
49.
SubrahmanyamATitmanS (1999) The going-public decision and the development of financial markets. The Journal of Finance54(3): 1045–1082.
50.
SutariaVHicksD (2004) New firm formation: Dynamics and determinants. Annals of Regional Science38(2): 241–262.
51.
WagnerJSternbergR (2004) Start-up activities, individual characteristics, and the regional milieu: Lessons for entrepreneurship support policies from German micro data. The Annals of Regional Science38(2): 219–240.
52.
WilsonNAltanlarA (2010) Risk and Insolvency Report: UK Sectors and Regions. Credit Management Research Centre, LUBS, University of Leeds.
53.
WojcikD (2009) Financial centre bias in primary equity markets. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society2(2): 193:209.
