Using Swedish data, we investigate whether the effectiveness of an entrepreneurship policy programme can be traced over time among those firms it supports. The results are drawn from a longitudinal matched pair analysis. Hypotheses were tested every year for eight years. The main conclusions are: when bias is considered the public support programme has not generated measurable additionality and the programme has to some extent been able to select firms on a general level; however, among those selected, the scheme has not been able to identify potentially successful firms.
Abadie A. and Imbens G. ( 2002) Simple and bias-corrected matching estimators for average treatment effects. NBER Technical Working Paper283.
2.
Abadie A., Drukker D., Herr JL and Imbens G. ( 2004) Implementing matching estimators for average treatment effects in stata. Stata Journal4(3): 290-311.
3.
Almus M. ( 2004) Job creation through public start-up assistance ? Applied Economics36(18): 2015-2024.
4.
Åstebro T. ( 2003) The return to independent invention: Evidence of unrealistic optimism, risk seeking or skewness loving?The Economic Journal113: 226-239.
5.
Audretsch DB ( 2002) Entrepreneurship: A Survey of the Literature. European Commission, Enterprise Directorate General.
6.
Bager-Sjögren L. and Lööf H. ( 2005) The Impact on Growth from Public Seed Financing to New Technology Projects in Small Enterprises. Stockholm : ITPS.
7.
Barney J. ( 1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage . Journal of Management17(1): 99.
8.
Baum J. and Silverman B. ( 2004) Picking winners or building them? Alliance, intellectual, and human capital as selection criteria in venture financing and performance of biotechnology start-ups. Journal of Business Venturing19: 411-436.
9.
Bygrave WD and Timmons JA ( 1992) Venture Capital at the Crossroads. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
10.
Chrisman JJ and McMullan EW ( 2000) A preliminary assessment of outsider assistance as a knowledge resource: The longer-term impact of new venture counselling . Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice24(3): 37.
11.
COM (2005) Decision of the European Parliament and the Council.
12.
COM (2006) Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions.
13.
Cusumano MA, Mylonadis Y. and Rosenbloom RS ( 1992) Strategic maneuvering and mass-market dynamics: The triumph of VHS over Beta. Business History Review66(1): 51.
14.
Davidsson P. and Henrekson M. ( 2002) Determinants of the prevalence of start-ups and high-growth firms. Small Business Economics19: 81-104.
15.
Davidsson P., Kirchhoff B., Hetemi-JA and Gustafsson H. ( 2002) Empirical analysis of business growth factors using Swedish data. Journal of Small Business Management40: 332-349.
16.
Deakins D. ( 1994) Risk assessment with asymmetric information. International Journal of Bank Marketing Emerald12: 24.
17.
Drucker, PF ( 1985) Innovation and Entrepreneurship. London : Heineman.
18.
Edling J., Hermansson K., Nilsson R. and Nordborg J. ( 2007) Innovativa Små Och Medelstora Företag - Sveriges Framtid. VINNOVA policy VP2007:01. Stockholm , VINNOVA: 96.
19.
Evca (2006) Evca Yearbook 2006 . Belgium: EVCA.
20.
Governmental Decision (1994) Regeringsbeslut 23: Upprättande Av Stiftelsen Innovationscentrum , 1994:862/94 (Governmental Decision on Inception of Sweden Innovation Centre).
Harhoff D. and Stahl K. ( 1998) Legal form, growth and exit of West German firms - empirical results for manufacturing, construction, trade and service industries . Journal of Industrial Economics46: 453-488.
23.
Heckam J. and Robb R. ( 1985) Alternative methods for evaluating the impact of interventions . In: Heckman J and Singer B (eds) Longitudinal Analysis of Labor Market Data . New York: Wiley.
24.
Heckman J., Ichimura H. and Todd P. ( 1997) Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training program. Review of Economic Studies64(4): 605-654.
25.
Heydebreck P., Klofsten M. and Maier J.C. ( 2000) Innovation support for new technology-based firms: The Swedish Teknopol approach. R&D Management30(1): 89-100.
26.
Hjalmarsson D. and Johansson AW ( 2003) Public advisory services - theory and practice . Entrepreneurship & Regional Development15(1): 83.
27.
Hoogerwerf A. ( 1990) Reconstructing policy theory. Evaluation and Program Planning13(3): 285-291.
28.
Jaffe AB ( 2002) Building programme evaluation into the design of public research-support programmes. Oxford Review of Economic Policy18(1): 22-34.
29.
Klofsten M. ( 1992) Tidiga Utvecklingsprocesser i Teknikbaserade Företag (Early development processes in technology-based firms). Dissertation, Linköping University.
30.
Klofsten M. ( 2005) New venture ideas: An analysis of their origin and early development. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management17: 105-119.
31.
Klofsten M., Jonsson M. and Simón J. ( 1999) Supporting the pre-commercialization stages of technology-based firms: The effects of small-scale venture capital. Venture Capital1(1): 83-93.
32.
Leleux B. and Surlemont B. ( 2003) Public versus private venture capital: Seeding or crowding out? A Pan-European analysis. Journal of Business Venturing18: 81-104.
33.
Lerner J. ( 2002) When bureaucrats meet entrepreneurs: The design of effective public venture capital programmes. Economic Journal112: F73.
34.
Lundström A. and Stevenson L. ( 2002) On the Road to Entrepreneurship Policy. Stockholm: FSF.
35.
Lundström A. and Stevenson L. ( 2005) Entrepreneurship Policy: Theory and Practice. New York: Springer.
36.
Mainprize B. and Hindle K. ( 2007) The benefit: a well-written entrepreneurial business plan is to an entrepreneur what a midwife is to an expecting mother. Journal of Private Equity11(1): 40-52.
37.
Mason C. and Harrisson R. ( 2002) Barriers to investment in the informal venture capital sector. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development14: 271-287.
38.
Meyer M. ( 2005) Independent inventors and public support measures: Insights from 33 case studies in Finland. World Patent Information27: 113-123.
39.
Ministry of Trade and Industry (2006) En Nationell Strategi för Regional Konkurrenskraft, Entreprenörskap Och Sysselsättning 2007-2013. (A National Strategy for Regional Competitiveness), Stockholm.
40.
Mosselman M., Prince Y. and Kemp R. ( 2004) Review of the methodologies to measure effectiveness of state aid to SMEs. Final Report to the European Commission .
41.
Nagel SS ( 2002) Handbook of Public Policy Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
42.
Norrman C. ( 2005) Publicly funded support of technology-based ventures . Linköping Studies in Science and Technology, Licentiate Thesis, No 1219, LiU, Tek-Lic 2005:72, Linköping University, Linköping .
43.
Norrman C. ( 2008) Entrepreneurship policy: Public support for technology-based venturesDissertation No.1175, LinköpingInstitute of Technology .
44.
Norrman C. and Klofsten M.(2009) An entrepreneurship policy programme: Implications and expectations . International Journal of Entrepreneurship & Innovation10(1): 33-42.
45.
North D., Smallbone D. and Vickers I. ( 2001) Public sector support for innovating SMEs. Small Business Economics16: 303-317.
46.
Oakey RP ( 2003) Funding innovation and growth in UK new technology-based firms: Some observations on contributions from the public and private sectors . Venture Capital5(2): 161-179.
47.
Oecd (2006) Going for Growth . Paris: OECD.
48.
Penrose ET ( 1959) The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. London: Basil Blackwell.
49.
Pleiborn M. ( 2002) Projekt Vid Stiftelsen Innovationscentrum (Projects at Sweden Innovation Centre)Stockholm: Stiftelsen Innovationscentrum and Temaplan.
50.
Reitberger G. ( 1983) STU-Projekt med Villkorlig Återbetalningsskyldighet - Analys och Utvärdering av Effekter (STU-projects with conditional duty of repayment - analysis and evaluation of effects). Konsultrapport, Dnr834014, September 1983, Styrelsen för Teknisk Utveckling.
51.
Rosenbaum P. and Rubin D. ( 1984) Reducing the bias in observation studies using sub-classification on the propensity score. Journal of the American Statistical Association79: 516-524.
52.
Rothschild M. and Stiglitz J. ( 1976) Equilibrium in competitive insurance markets: An essay on the economics of imperfect information. Quarterly Journal of Economics90: 629-649.
53.
Rush H., Bessant J. and Lees S. ( 2004) Assessing the effectiveness of technology policy - a long-term view. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management16(3): 327-342.
54.
Salmenkaita J-P. and Salo A. ( 2002) Rationales for government intervention in the commercialization of new technologies. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management14(2): 183-200.
55.
Shane S. and Cable D. ( 2002) Network ties, reputation, and the financing of new ventures. Management Science, INFORMS: Institute for Operations Research48: 364.
56.
SIC (1999) Årsredovisning . Stockholm: Sweden Innovation Centre .
57.
SIC (2002) . StockholmStiftelsen Innovationscentrum 2002 (Sweden Innovation Centre 2002): Stiftelsen Innovationscentrum.
58.
SIC (2004) 10 År Med Stiftelsen Innovationscentrum (10 Years with Sweden Innovation Centre). Stockholm: Stiftelsen Innovationscentrum : 1-15.
59.
Stam E., Suddle K., Hessles J. and van Stel A. ( 2007) High growth entrepreneurs, public policies and economic growth. Jena Economic Research Papers2007-2019.
60.
Stinchcombe AL ( 1965) Social Structure and Organizations. Handbook of Organizations . New York: Garland Publishing.
61.
Storey DJ ( 1994) Understanding the Small Business Sector. London: Routledge.
62.
Storey DJ ( 2000) Six steps to heaven: Evaluating the impact of public policies to support small business in developed economies. In: Sexton D and Landström H (eds) The Blackwell Handbook of Entrepreneurship. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 176-193.
63.
Storey D.J. ( 2003) Entrepreneurship: Small and Medium Sized Enterprises and Public Policies. Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research . Amsterdam: Kluwer.
64.
Storey DJ and Tether BS ( 1998) New technology-based firms in the European Union: An introduction . Research Policy26(9): 933-946.
65.
Svensson R. ( 2007) Commercialization of Patents and External Financing during the R&D-Phase, Research Policy, Vol. 36(7), s. 1052-69, 2007.
66.
Wallsten SJ ( 2000) The effects of government-industry R&D programs on private R&D: The case of the small business innovation research program . RAND Journal of Economics31(1): 82-100.
67.
Vedin BA ( 1993) Innovationer för Sverige: Betänkande Av Innovationsutredningen (Innovations for Sweden), SOU1993:84, Näringsdepartementet, Stockholm.
68.
Vedung E. ( 1998) Utvärdering I Politik och Förvaltning (Evaluation in Politics and Administration). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
69.
Westhead P. and Storey DJ ( 1997) Financial constraints on the growth of high technology small firms in the United Kingdom. Applied Financial Economics7(2): 197-201.
70.
Zacharakis AL and Meyer GD ( 2000) The potential of actuarial decision models: Can they improve the venture capital investment decision? Journal of Business Venturing15: 323-346.
