This article identifies and classifies the problems perceived by entrepreneurs when they use social network ties (direct and indirect ties) to acquire resources during the early stages of new venture formation process. On the basis of field interviews with 128 high-tech entrepreneurs in Singapore, the author finds that entrepreneurs have a high level of awareness of the potential problems of social networks, though they rely extensively on network ties. Substantial variations occur across the three dimensions of potential problems (information, influence and solidarity) and three types of resources (financial resources, key team members and lead users). This study offers a more complete understanding of how and why entrepreneurs use social networks and the influence of their use on the entrepreneurial process.
Adler PS and Kwon S. ( 2002) Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review27: 17-40.
2.
Ahuja G. ( 2000) Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly45: 425-455.
3.
Aldrich H. and Zimmer C. ( 1986) Entrepreneurship through social networks. In: Sexton D, Smilor R (eds) The Art and Science of Entrepreneurship . Cambridge, MA : Ballinger, 3-24.
4.
Batjargal Bn and Liu M. ( 2004) Entrepreneurs access to private equity in China: The role of social capital. Organization Science15(2): 159-172.
5.
Baron R. and Tang J.(2009) Entrepreneurs’ social skills and new venture performance: Mediating mechanisms and cultural generality. Journal of Management35(2): 282-306.
6.
Baum JAC and Oliver C. ( 1991) Institutional linkages and organizational mortality . Administrative Science Quarterly36: 187-218.
7.
Bhide A. and Stevenson H. ( 1992) Attracting stakeholders. In: Sahlman W, Stevenson H (eds) The Entrepreneurial Venture. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publications, 149-159.
8.
Bian Y. and Ang S. ( 1997) Guanxi networks and job mobility in China and Singapore . Social Forces75: 981-1005.
9.
Birley S. ( 1985) The role of networks in the entrepreneurial process . Journal of Business Venturing1: 107-117.
10.
Brass DJ and Labianca G. ( 1999) Social capital, social liabilities, and social resources management. In: Leenders RTh.AJ and Gabbay SM (eds) Corporate Social Capital and Liability. Boston, MA: Kluwer , 298-322.
11.
Brush CG, Greene PG, and Hart MM ( 2001) From initial idea to unique advantage: The entrepreneurial challenge of constructing a resource base. Academy of Management Executive15(1): 64-78.
12.
Burkart M., Panunzi F., and Shleifer A. ( 2003) Family firms. Journal of Finance58(5): 2167-2201.
13.
Burt RS ( 1992) Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14.
Casson M. and Giusta MD ( 2007) Entrepreneurship and social capital: Analyzing the impact of social networks on entrepreneurial activity from a rational action perspective . International Small Business Journal25(3): 220-244.
15.
Cohen J. and Cohen P. ( 1983) Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for The Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16.
Coleman J. ( 1990) Foundation of Social Theory. Cambridge : Belknap Press.
17.
Dubini P. and Aldrich H. ( 1991) Personal and extended networks are central to the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing6: 305-313.
18.
Edelman LF, Bresnen M., Newell S., Scarbrough H., and Swan J. ( 2004) The benefits and pitfalls of social capital: Empirical evidence from two organizations in the United Kingdom. British Journal of Management15: S59-S69.
19.
Eisenhardt KM ( 1989) Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments . Academy of Management Journal32: 543-576.
20.
Emerson RM ( 1981) Social exchange theory. In: Rosenberg M, Turner R (eds) Social Psychology: Sociological Perspectives. New York : Basic Books, 30-65.
21.
Fei X. ( 1947) From the Soil. Berkeley, CA : University of California Press.
Fontana A. and Frey JH ( 1994) Interviewing - the art of science. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
24.
Gabbay SM ( 1997) Social Capital in the Creation of Financial Capital: The Case of Network Marketing. Champaign, IL: Stipes.
25.
Gabbay SM and Zuckerman EW ( 1998) Social capital and opportunity in corporate R&D: The contingent effect of contact density on mobility expectation. Social Science Research27: 189-217.
26.
Geertz C. ( 1963) Peddlers and Princes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
27.
Glaser BG and Strauss AL ( 1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine.
28.
Golden BR ( 1992) The past is the past - or is it? The use of retrospective accounts as indicators of past strategy. Academy of Management Journal35: 848-860.
29.
Gomez-Mejia LR, Nuñez-Nickel M., and Gutierrez I. ( 2002) The role of family ties in agency contracts. Academy of Management Journal44(1), 81-95.
30.
Gargiulo M. and Benassi M. ( 1999) The dark side of social capital. In: Leenders RTh.AJ, Gabbay SM (eds) Corporate Social Capital and Liability. Boston, MA: Kluwer, 298-322.
31.
Granovetter M. ( 1973) The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology78: 1360-1380.
32.
Granovetter M. ( 1985) Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness . American Journal of Sociology91: 481-510.
33.
Greve A. and Salaff JW ( 2003) Social networks and entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice27: 1-22.
34.
Gulati R. ( 1995) Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Academy of Management Journal38: 85-112.
35.
Hansen EL ( 1995) Entrepreneurial networks and new organization growth . Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice19(4): 7-19.
36.
Hansen MT ( 1998) Combing network centrality and related knowledge: Explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit firms. Working paper, Harvard Business School, Boston.
37.
Hite JM and Hesterly WS ( 2001) The evolution of firm networks: From emergence to early growth of the firm. Strategic Management Journal22: 275-286.
38.
Hoang H. and Antoncic B. ( 2003) Network-based research in entrepreneurship: A critical review. Journal of Business Venturing18: 165-187.
39.
Hung H. ( 2006) Formation and survival of new ventures: A path from interpersonal to interorganizational networks. International Small Business Journal24: 359-378.
40.
Jack SL ( 2005) The role use and activation of strong and weak network ties: A qualitative analysis. Journal of Management Studies42(6): 1233-1259.
41.
Jack S., Drakopoulou Dodd S., and Anderson AR ( 2008) Change and the development of entrepreneurial networks over time: A processual perspective. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development20: 125-139.
42.
Janis I. ( 1972) Victims of groupthink. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
43.
Kamm JB and Nurick AJ ( 1993) The stages of team venture formation: A decision-making model. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice Winter: 17-27.
44.
Larson A. ( 1992) Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings: A study of the governance of exchange relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly37: 76-104.
45.
Larson A. and Starr JA ( 1993) A network model of organizational formation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice Winter: 5-15.
46.
Lechner C., Dowling M., and Welpe I. ( 2006) Firm networks and firm development: The role of the relational mix. Journal of Business Venturing21: 514-540.
47.
Leung A., Zhang J., Wong PK, and Foo MD ( 2006) The use of networks in human resource acquisition for entrepreneurial firms: Multiple fit considerations. Journal of Business Venturing21: 664-686.
48.
Lin N. ( 2001) Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action . New York: Cambridge University Press.
49.
Locke EA ( 1999) Some reservations about social capital. Academy of Management Review24(1): 8-9.
50.
Lubatkin MH, Schulze WS, Ling Y., and Dino RN ( 2005) The effects of parental altruism on the governance of family-managed firms. Journal of Organizational Behavior26(3): 313-330.
51.
Miller C., Cardinal L., and Glick W. ( 1997) Retrospective reports in organizational research: A reexamination of recent evidence. Academy of Management Journal40: 189-204.
52.
Miller NJ, Besser T., and Malshe A. ( 2007) Strategic networking among small businesses in small US communities. International Small Business Journal25(6): 631-665.
53.
Nahapiet J. and Ghoshal S. ( 1998) Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review23: 242-266.
54.
Portes A. ( 1998) Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology24: 1-24.
55.
Portes A. and Sensenbrenner J. ( 1993) Embeddedness and immigration: Notes on the social determinates of economic action. American Journal of Sociology6: 1320-1350.
56.
Rousseau DM and Fried Y. ( 2001) Location, location, location: Contextualizing organizational research. Journal of Organizational Behavior22: 1-13.
57.
Ramsey FL and Schafer DW ( 2002) The Statistical Sleuth: A Course in Methods of Data Analysis , 2nd edn. Sydney : Duxbury.
58.
Reynolds PD ( 1991) Sociology and entrepreneurship: Concepts and contributions . Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice16(2): 47-70.
59.
Sandefur RL and Laumann EO ( 1998) A paradigm for social capital. Rationality and Society10(4): 481-501.
60.
Schulze WS, Lubatkin MH, Dino RN, and Buchholtz AK ( 2001) Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence . Organizational Science12(2) 99-116.
61.
Shane S. and Cable D. ( 2002) Network ties reputation and the financing of new ventures . Management Science48: 364-381.
62.
Shapiro DL, Sheppard BH, and Cheraskin L. ( 1992) Business on a handshake. Negotiation Journal8: 365-377.
63.
Sharma P. ( 2004) An overview of the field of family business studies: Current status and directions for the future. Family Business Review17(1): 1-36.
64.
Silverman D. ( 2000) Doing Qualitative Research. London : SAGE.
65.
Starr JA and MacMillan IC ( 1990) Resource cooptation via social contracting: Resource acquisition strategies for new ventures. Strategic Management Journal11: 779-92.
66.
Stuart TE, Hoang H., and Hybels RC ( 1999) Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly44: 315-349.
67.
Todd E. ( 1985) The Explanation of Ideology, Family Structures, and Social Systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell .
68.
Uzzi B. ( 1997) Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly42: 35-67.
69.
Venkataraman S. ( 1997) The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research. Advances in Entrepreneurship Research, Firm Emergence and Growth3: 119-138.
70.
Wiklund J., Patzelt H., and Shepherd D. ( 2009) Building an integrative model of small business growth . Small Business Economics32: 351-374.
71.
Wong PK ( 2006) The remaking of Singapore’s high tech enterprise ecosystem. In: Rowen H, Hancock M and Miller W (eds) Making IT: The Rise of Asia in High Tech. Palo Alto, CA : Stanford University Press, 123-174.
72.
Wong S., Soh C., Neo B., and Goren G. ( 1993) The role of information technology in Singapore’s new-venture development. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship10(3): 101-111.
73.
Zahra SA ( 1996) Technology strategy and new venture performance: A study of corporate-sponsored and independent biotechnology ventures. Journal of Business Venturing11: 289-321.
74.
Zahra SA, Yavuz R., and Ucbasaran D. ( 2006) How much do you trust me? The dark side of relational trust in new venture creation in established companies. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice30: 541-559.
75.
Zhang J. and Wong PK ( 2008) Networks vs. market methods in high-tech venture fundraising: The impacts of institutional environment. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development20(September): 409-430.
76.
Zhao L. and Adam JD ( 1995) Networking and growth of young technology-intensive ventures in China. Journal of Business Venturing10: 349-370.
