This paper presents a hybrid approach that selectively merges aspects of both the theories of Shape Grammar and Space Syntax to investigate spatial design patterns. The paper describes the development of a generic Justified Plan Graph (g-JPG) grammar. This grammatically nuanced, syntactically derived approach is then demonstrated through a more specific JPG (s-JPG) grammar to identify spatial design patterns in the rural domestic architecture of Glenn Murcutt. The results are then discussed in terms of Murcutt's architecture from four perspectives: grammatical transformation of syntax, epistemological questions, similarity or disparity and finally in terms of JPG variations. The findings of this paper suggest that the combined analytic approach facilitates the exploration of both the grammatical and syntactical genotypes of sets of architectural designs.
AlexanderC (1964) Notes on the Synthesis of Form, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
2.
AlexanderCIshikawaSSilversteinM (1977) A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
3.
AmorimLMDE (1999) The Sectors' Paradigm: A Study of the Spatial and Functional Nature of Modernist Housing in Northeast Brazil. The Bartlett School of Graduate Studies, London: University of London.
Bafna S (1999) The morphology of early modernist residential plans: Geometry and genotypical trends in Mies van der Rohe's designs. In: Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Space Syntax, Brasília, pp. 01.01–01.12.
6.
Bafna S (2001) Geometric intuitions of genotypes. In: Proceedings of third International Space Syntax Symposium, Atlanta, 7–11 May 2001, pp. 20.21–20.16.
7.
BalmerJSwisherTM (2012) Diagramming the Big Idea: Methods for Architectural Composition, London: Routledge.
8.
BeirãoJNDuarteJPStouffsR (2011) Creating specific grammars with generic grammars: Towards flexible urban design. Nexus Network Journal13: 73–111.
9.
ÇaǧdaşG (1996) A shape grammar: The language of traditional Turkish houses. Environment and Planning B23: 443–464.
10.
ChomskyN (1995) The Minimalist Program, Cambridge: The MIT Press.
11.
CorbettGGFraserNMMcGlashanS (1993) Heads in Grammatical Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
CostaECEDuarteJP (2015) Generic shape grammars for mass customization of ceramic tableware. In: GeroJSHannaS (eds) Design Computing and Cognition ‘14, London: Springer International Publishing, pp. 437–454.
13.
DawesMJOstwaldMJ (2013) Applications of graph theory in architectural analysis: Past, present and future research. In: CavalcanteA (ed.) Graph Theory: New Research, New York, NY: Nova Scientific, pp. 1–36.
14.
Economou A (2000) Shape grammars in architectural design studio. In: 2000 ACSA technology conference, Hong Kong, 10–14 June 2000.
15.
FreudensteinFMakiER (1979) The creation of mechanisms according to kinematic structure and function. Environment and Planning B6: 375–391.
16.
GraslT (2012) Transformational Palladians. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design39: 83–95.
17.
GraslTEconomouA (2013) From topologies to shapes: Parametric shape grammars implemented by graphs. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design40: 905–922.
18.
HansonJ (1998) Decoding Homes and Houses, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.
HansonNLRRadfordAD (1986a) Living on the edge: A grammar for some country Houses by Glenn Murcutt. Architecture Australia75: 66–73.
20.
HansonNLRRadfordAD (1986b) On modelling the work of the architect Glenn Murcutt. Design Computing1: 189–203.
21.
HeitorTDuarteJPintoR (2004) Combining grammars and space syntax: Formulating, generating and evaluating designs. International Journal of Architectural Computing2: 492–515.
22.
HillierB (1999) Space is the Machine: A Configurational Theory of Architecture, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
HillierBHansonJ (1984) The Social Logic of Space, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
HillierBHansonJGrahamH (1987) Ideas are in things: An application of the space syntax method to discovering house genotypes. Environment and Planning B14: 363–385.
25.
HopcroftJEMotwaniRUllmanJD (2006) Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages, and Computation, 3rd ed. Boston, MA, USA: Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc.
26.
KnightTW (1994) Transformations in Design: A Formal Approach to Stylistic Change and Innovation in the Visual Arts, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
KnightTW (2003) Either/or → and. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design30: 327–338.
28.
KoningHEizenbergJ (1981) The language of the Prairie: Frank Lloyd Wright's Prairie houses. Environment and Planning B8: 295–323.
29.
KrsticD (1999) Constructing algebras of design. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design26: 45–57.
30.
KrsticD (2015) Language of the Rascian school: Analyzing Rascian church plans via parallel shape grammar. In: GeroJSHannaS (eds) Design Computing and Cognition ‘14, London: Springer International Publishing, pp. 421–436.
31.
LawsonB (2006) How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified, Burlington, MA: Elsevier/Architectural.
32.
Lee JH, Ostwald MJ and Gu N (2013) Combining space syntax and shape grammar to investigate architectural style: Considering Glenn Murcutt's domestic designs. In: Proceedings of 9th international space syntax symposium, Sejong University Press, Seoul.
33.
LeeJHOstwaldMJGuN (2015) A syntactical and grammatical approach to architectural configuration, analysis and generation. Architectural Science Review58: 189–204.
34.
LiXSchmidtL (2004) Grammar-based designer assistance tool for epicyclic gear trains. Journal of Mechanical Design126: 895–902.
35.
MarchL (2002) Architecture and mathematics since 1960. In: RodriguesKWJF (ed.) Nexus IV: Architecture and Mathematics, Fucecchio, Florence: Kim Williams Books, pp. 7–33.
36.
MarchLSteadmanP (1971) The Geometry of Environment, London: RIBA Publications.
37.
OstwaldMJ (2011a) A justified plan graph analysis of the early houses (1975–1982) of Glenn Murcutt. Nexus Network Journal13: 737–762.
38.
OstwaldMJ (2011b) Examining the relationship between topology and geometry: A configurational analysis of the rural houses (1984–2005) of Glenn Murcutt. The Journal of Space Syntax2: 223–246.
39.
OstwaldMJ (2011c) The mathematics of spatial configuration: Revisiting, revising and critiquing justified plan graph theory. Nexus Network Journal13: 445–470.
40.
PratsMEarlCGarnerSet al. (2006) Shape exploration of designs in a style: Toward generation of product designs. AI EDAM20: 201–215.
41.
PressmanA (2012) Designing Architecture: The Elements of Process, London: Routledge.
42.
RashidM (2012) Shape-sensitive configurational descriptions of building plans. International Journal of Architectural Computing10: 33–52.
43.
SchmidtLCaganJ (1997) GGREADA: A graph grammar-based machine design algorithm. Research in Engineering Design9: 195–213.
44.
SeonwookK (2012) Architectural and Program Diagrams, Berlin: DOM Publishers.
45.
SteadmanP (1983) Architectural Morphology: An Introduction to the Geometry of Building Plans, London: Pion Ltd.
46.
StinyG (1990) What is a design?Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design17: 97–103.
47.
StinyG (1994) Shape rules: Closure, continuity, and emergence. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design21: S49–S78.
48.
StinyGGipsJ (1972) Shape grammars and the generative specification of painting and sculpture. In: FreimanCV (ed.) Information processing 71, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 23–28 August 1971, pp. 1460–1465.
49.
StinyGMitchellWJ (1978) The Palladian grammar. Environment and Planning B5: 5–18.
50.
van der VoordtTJMVrielinkDvan WegenHBR (1997) Comparative floorplan-analysis in programming and architectural design. Design Studies18: 67–88.
51.
VaughanJOstwaldMJ (2014) Measuring the significance of façade transparency in Australian regionalist architecture: A computational analysis of 10 designs by Glenn Murcutt. Architectural Science Review57: 249–259.
52.
WadeJW (1977) Architecture, Problems, and Purposes: Architectural Design as a Basic Problem-solving Process, New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
