This paper describes a study which compares the effectiveness of
'classical' paired reading with simultaneous and independent reading
over a period of nine weeks using parent tutors with second-year junior
children. The results confirm the indications from other largely non-
controlled studies that the classical approach is superior to other
variations of paired reading. Of importance is the finding that the less
able reader appears to benefit to a greater extent than the more able
reader from being tutored in reading by a parent, especially in the
long-term.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Athey, I.1970: Affective factors in reading. In Singer, H. and Ruddell, R. , editors, Theoretical models and processes of reading, Newark, Delaware: International Reading Association .
2.
Borg, W.R.1981: Applying educational research. London : Longman.
3.
Bush, A.1983: Can pupils' reading be improved by involving their parents? RemedialEducation18, 167-70.
4.
Cook, D.L.1962: The Hawthorne Effect in educational research. Phi Delta Kappan44, 116-22.
5.
Department of Education and Science1975: A language for life. London: H.M.S.O.
6.
Diaper, G.R.1989: A comparative study of paired reading techniques using parent, peer and cross-age tutors with second year junior children. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Christchurch College, Canterbury.
7.
Evans, A.1985: Parental involvement in children's reading: is a structural technique necessary? SERCH (Sheffield)7, 11-14.
Gittleman, R. and Feingold, I.1983: Children with reading disorders. I. Efficacy of reading remediation. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry24, 167-91.
10.
Godfrey Thomson Unit, University of Edinburgh.1980: Edinburgh Reading Test, Stage 2, 2nd edition. Sevenoaks: Hodder & Stoughton.
11.
Greening, M. and Spenceley, J.1984: Paired reading made easy. INPSYCH11, 4-11. (Bulletin of Cleveland County Psychological Service).
12.
— 1987: Shared reading: support for inexperienced readers . Educational Psychology in Practice, April, 31-37.
13.
Hannon, P. and Tizard, B.1987: Parent involvement - a no-score draw?Times Educational Supplement3.4.87.
14.
Hewison, J. and Tizard, J.1980: Parental involvement and reading attainment. British Journal of Educational Psychology50, 209-15.
15.
Lawrence, D.1971: The effects of counselling on retarded readers . Educational Research13, 119-24.
16.
— 1972: Counselling of retarded readers by non-professionals. Educational Research15, 48-51.
17.
— 1981: The development of self-esteem questionnaire. British Journal of Educational Psychology51, 245-51.
18.
— 1985: Improving self-esteem and reading. Educational Research27,194-200.
19.
Lindsay, G., Evans, A. and Jones, B.1985: Paired reading versus relaxed reading: a comparison . British Journal of Educational Psychology55, 304-9.
20.
Morgan, R. and Lyon, E.1979: 'Paired reading' - a preliminary report on a technique for parental tuition of reading-retarded children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry20, 151-60.
Spache, G.D.1954: Personality characteristics of retarded readers as measured by the picture-frustration study. Educational and Psychological Measurement14, 186-92.
26.
— 1957: Personality patterns of retarded readers. Journal of Educational Research50, 461-69.
27.
Tizard, J., Schofield, W.N. and Hewison, J.1982: Symposium: reading collaboration between teachers and parents in assisting children's reading. British Journal of Educational Psychology52, 1-15.
28.
Topping, K.J.1977: An evaluation of the long-term effects of remedial teaching. RemedialEducation12, 84-86.