Children with Angelman syndrome (AS) exhibit significant social, communicative and cognitive difficulties. The aim of this case study was to describe the profile of communicative abilities of a child with AS, before and after the implementation of the Hanen program ‘More than words’ (MTW). Additionally, changes on the language directed at her in spontaneous interactions were analysed. Advances were observed regarding the quantity and quality of communicative acts displayed by the child, both in natural interactions and through the use of standardized instruments. Moreover, a different rate of development was noted, when comparing two time periods (with and without MTW intervention). Linguistic input provided by the mother also exhibited some variations after treatment. Our findings suggest that MTW could be a promising approach to use with the communicative challenges experienced by AS children. Further research is needed to add more evidence about the suitability of the MTW program for AS individuals.
AlvaresRLDowningSF (1998) A survey of expressive communication skills in children with Angelman syndrome. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology7: 14–24.
2.
AndersenWHRasmussenRKStrømmeP (2001) Levels of cognitive and linguistic development in Angelman syndrome: A study of 20 children. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology26: 2–9.
3.
BaxendaleJHeskethA (2003) Comparison of the effectiveness of the Hanen Parent Programme and traditional clinic therapy. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders38: 397–415.
4.
BonatiMTRussoSFinelliP. (2007) Evaluation of autism traits in Angelman syndrome: A resource to unfold autism genes. Neurogenetics8: 169–78.
5.
CalculatorS (2002) Use of enhanced natural gestures to foster interactions between children with Angelman syndrome and their parents. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology11: 3340–55.
6.
CalculatorS (2013) Parents’ reports of patterns of use and exposure to practices associated with AAC acceptance by individuals with Angelman syndrome. Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC)29: 146–58.
7.
CalculatorS (2014) Parents’ perceptions of communication patterns and effectiveness of use of augmentative and alternative communication systems by their children with Angelman syndrome. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology23: 562–73.
8.
CarterAMessingerDStoneW. (2011) A randomized controlled trial of Hanen’s ‘More than words’ in toddlers with early autism. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry52: 741–52.
9.
Clayton-SmithJ (1993) Clinical research on Angelman syndrome in the United Kingdom. American Journal Medical Genetics46: 12–15.
10.
Clayton-SmithJ (2001) Angelman syndrome: Evolution of the phenotype in young adults. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology43: 476–80.
11.
DanB (2009) Angelman syndrome: Current understanding and research prospects. Epilepsia50: 2331–39.
12.
DewartHSummersS (1995) The Pragmatics Profile of everyday communication in children. Windsor: The NFER-NELSON Publishing Company Limited.
13.
DiddenRKorziliusHDukerP. (2004) Communicative functioning in individuals with Angelman syndrome: A comparative study. Disability and Rehabilitation26: 1263–67.
14.
DiddenRKorziliusHKamphuisA. (2006) Preferences in individuals with Angelman syndrome assessed by a modified Choice Assessment Scale. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research50: 54–60.
15.
DiddenRSigafoosJKorziliusH. (2009) Form and function of communicative behaviors in individuals with Angelman syndrome. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities22: 526–37.
16.
GentileJTanWHHorowitzL. (2010) A neurodevelopmental survey of Angelman syndrome with genotype–phenotype correlations. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics31: 592–601.
17.
GirolamettoL (1995) Reflections on the origins of directiveness: Implications for intervention. Journal of Early Intervention19: 104–06.
18.
GirolamettoLSussmanFWeitzmanR (2007) Using case study methods to investigate the effects of interactive intervention for children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Communication Disorders40: 470–92.
19.
GlogowskaMCampbellR (2000) Investigating parental views of involvement in pre-school speech and language therapy. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders35: 391–405.
20.
JolleffNRyanM (1993) Communication development in Angelman’s syndrome. Archives of Disease in Childhood69: 148–50.
21.
JolleffNEmmersonFRyanM. (2006) Communication skills in Angelman syndrome: Matching phenotype to genotype. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology8: 28–33.
22.
KishinoTLalandeMWagstaffJ (1997) UBE3A/E6-AP mutations cause Angelman syndrome. Nature Genetics15: 70–73.
23.
LobanW (1976) Language development: Kindergarten through grade twelve. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
24.
McConachieHRandleVHammalD. (2005) A controlled trial of a training course for parents of children with suspected autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Pediatrics147: 335–40.
25.
MillerJFAndriacchiKNockertsA (eds) (2011) Assessing language production using SALT software: a clinician’s guide to language sample analysis. Middleton, WI: SALT Software LLC.
26.
MountROliverCBergK. (2011) Effects of adult familiarity on social behaviours in Angelman syndrome. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities Research55: 339–50.
OliverCDemetriadesLHallS (2002) Effects of environmental events on smiling and laughing behaviour in Angelman syndrome. American Journal of Mental Retardation107: 194–200.
29.
PennerKAJohnstonJFairclothBH. (1993) Communication, cognition and social interaction in Angelman syndrome. American Journal of Medical Genetics46: 34–39.
30.
PetersSUBeaudetAlMadduriN. (2004a) Autism in Angelman syndrome: Implications for autism research. Clinical Genetics66: 530–36.
31.
PetersSUGoddard-FinegoldJBeaudetAl. (2004b) Cognitive and adaptive behavior profiles of children with Angelman syndrome. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A. 128A: 110–13.
32.
RadstaakeMDiddenROliverC. (2012) Functional analysis and functional communication training in individuals with Angelman syndrome. Developmental Neurorehabilitation15: 91–104.
33.
RadstaakeMDiddenRLangR. (2013) Functional analysis and functional communication training in the classroom for three children with Angelman syndrome. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities25: 49–63.
34.
SackettC (1978) Observing behavior: Volume 1. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
35.
ShumwaySWetherbyAM (2009) Communicative acts of children with Autism Spectrum Disorders in the second year of life. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research52: 1139–56.
36.
SigafoosJArthur-KellyMButterfieldN (2006) Enhancing everyday communication with children with disabilities. Baltimore, MD: Paul H Brookes.
37.
SpikerDBoyceGBoyceL (2002) Parent–child interactions when young children have disabilities. International Review of Research in Mental Retardation25: 35–70.
38.
SummersJImpeyJ (2011) Assessing joint attention responding and initiation in children with Angelman syndrome. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities24: 450–58.
39.
SummersJSzatmariP (2009) Using Discrete Trial Instruction to teach children with Angelman syndrome. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities24: 216–26.
40.
SummersJAAllisonDBLynchPS. (1995) Behaviour problems in Angelman syndrome. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research39: 97–106.
41.
SussmanF (1999) More than words. Toronto: The Hanen Centre.
42.
TrillingsgaardAOstergaardJR (2004) Autism in Angelman syndrome: An exploration of comorbidity. Autism8: 163–74.
43.
WalzNCBaranekGT (2006) Sensory processing patterns in persons with Angelman syndrome. American Journal of Occupational Therapy60: 472–79.
44.
WetherbyAPrizantB (2002) Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scales Developmental Profile (CSBS DP). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
45.
WetherbyAMCainDHYonclasDG. (1988) Analysis of intentional communication of normal children from the prelinguistic to the multiword stage. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research31: 240–52.
46.
WilliamsCAFriasJL (1982) The Angelman (‘Happy Puppet’) syndrome. American Journal of Medical Genetics11: 453–60.
47.
WilliamsCABeaudetalClayton-SmithJ. (2006) Conference Report. Angelman syndrome 2005: Updated Consensus for Diagnostic Criteria. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A140A: 413–18.
48.
YoderPWarrenS (1999) Maternal responsivity mediated the relationship between prelinguistic intentional communication and later language. Journal of Early Intervention22: 126–36.
49.
Yong-HuiJTing-FenTBresslerJ. (1998) Imprinting in Angelman and Prader–Willi. Syndromes. Current Opinions in Genetics and Development8: 334–42.
