This paper highlights the appeal of dynamic assessment (DA) for speech and language
therapists (SLTs), and describes the usefulness of various DA models and methods. It
describes the background to DA, and the uses to which DA has been put, by
educational psychologists in the UK, and by SLTs in the USA. The research and
development of methods of DA are described, and the case for developing DA methods
for use in a) research and predictive applications, and b) clinical applications to
inform interventions by SLTs and in collaborative practice, is made. Implications
for future research are presented.
Birnbaum, R.
and
Deutsch, R.1996‘The use of dynamic assessment and its relationship to the code
of practice’
, Educational and Child Psychology13(3),
14-24
.
2.
Campione, J. C.1989‘Assisted assessment: a taxonomy of approaches and an outline of
strengths and weaknesses’
, Journal of Learning Disabilities22,
151-165
.
3.
Campione, J. C.
and
Brown, A. L.1987‘Linking dynamic assessment with school
achievement’ (ed.), in
Lidz, C. S.
, Dynamic assessment: an interactional approach to evaluating learning
potential.
New York: The Guilford Press
.
4.
Deutsch, R.
and
Reynolds, Y.2000‘The use of dynamic assessment by educational psychologists in
the UK’
, Educational Psychology in Practice16(3),
311-331
.
5.
Dockrell, J. E.2001‘Assessing language skills in pre-school children’
, Child Psychology and Psychiatry Review6(2),
74-83
.
6.
Dockrell, J.
and
McShane, J.1993Children’s learning difficulties: a cognitive approach.
Oxford: Blackwell
.
7.
Elliott, J. G.2001‘All testing is dynamic: a response to Sternberg and Grigorenko’
, Issues in Education7(2),
185-191
.
Enderby, P.
and
Emerson, J.1995‘Does speech and language therapy work? A review of the Literature
’,
London: Whurr
.
10.
Feuerstein, R.1980Instrumental enrichment: an intervention programme for cognitive
modifiability,
Baltimore: University Park Press
.
11.
Feuerstein, R.2001‘Instrumental enrichment. An introduction to courses’,
Course material.
Jerusalem: ICELP Press
.
12.
Feuerstein, R.
,
Rand, Y.
,
Jensen, M. R.
,
Kaniel, S.
and
Tzuriel, D.1987‘Prerequisites for assessment of learning potential: the LPAD
model’, in
C. S. Lidz
(eds), Dynamic assessment: an interactional approach to evaluating
learning potential.
New York: The Guilford Press
.
13.
Feuerstein, R.
,
Feuerstein, R. S.
,
Falik, L.
and
Rand, Y.2002The dynamic assessment of cognitive modifiability.
Jerusalem: ICELP Press
.
14.
French, A. 1989 ‘Can children with semantic-pragmatic disorders
learn a task if it is structured into small steps, and are they able to generalize
this’, Unpublished BSc Project, Department of Clinical Communication
Studies, City University, London.
15.
Gutierrez-Clellan, V. F.
and
Peña, E.2001‘Dynamic assessment of diverse children: a tutorial’
, Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools.
32(4),
212-224
.
16.
Haywood, H. C.1993‘A mediational teaching style’
, International Journal of Cognitive and Mediated Learning3(1),
27-38
.
17.
Haywood, C.
and
Tzuriel, D.2002,
‘Applications and challenges in dynamic assessment’
, Peabody Journal of Education77(2),
40-63
.
18.
Kozulin, A.1990Vygotsky’s psychology. A biography of ideas.
London: Harvester Wheatsheaf
.
19.
Kozulin, A.
and
Garb, E.2001‘Dynamic assessment of EFL text comprehension’
, School Psychology International23(1),
112-127
.
20.
Lauchlan, F.
and
Carrigan, D.
2005
‘Getting dynamic about dynamic assessment: moving from theory to practice’
. Presentation, IACEP 10th International Conference,
University of Durham, UK.
21.
Law, J.1997‘Evaluating intervention for language impaired children: a review
of the literature’
, European Journal of Disorders of Communication32(2),
1-14
.
22.
Law, J.
,
Boyle, J.
,
Harris, F.
,
Harkness, A.
and
Nye, C.1998‘Screening for speech and language delay: a systematic review of
the literature’
, Health Technology Assessment2(9).
23.
Lidz, C.1991‘Practitioners guide to dynamic assessment’.
New York: Guilford Press
.
24.
Lidz, C.
and
Elliott, J. G.2000Dynamic assessment: prevailing models and applications, Vol. 6.
New York: JAI Press
.
25.
Miller, L.
,
Gillam, R. B.
and
Peña, E. D.2001Dynamic assessment and intervention: Improving children’s narrative
abilities,
Austin, TX: Pro-Ed
.
26.
Nelson, N.1998Childhood language disorders in context: infancy through adolescence,
Boston: Allyn & Bacon
.
27.
Nettelbladt, U.
,
Sahlén, B.
,
Ors, M.
,
Johannesson, P.1989‘A multidisciplinary assessment of children with severe language disorders’
, Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics3(4):
313-346
.
28.
Olswang, L.
,
Bain, B.
and
Johnson, G.1992‘Using dynamic assessment with children with language
disorders’, in
S. Warren
, and
J. Reichle
, (eds), Causes and effects in communication and language
intervention, pp. 187-215,
Baltimore: Paul H., Brookes
.
29.
Olswang, L. B.
and
Bain, B. A.1996‘Assessment information for predicting upcoming change in
language production’
, Journal of Speech and Hearing Research39,
414-423
.
30.
Peña, E.
and
Gillam, R.2000‘Dynamic assessment of children referred for speech and language
evaluations’, in
C. S. Lidz
, and
J. Elliott
, (eds), Dynamic assessment: prevailing models and applications,
Vol. 6., pp. 543-574,
Amsterdam: JAI/Elsevier Science
.
31.
Peña, E.
,
Quinn, R.
and
Iglesias, A.1992‘The application of dynamic methods to language assessment: a
nonbiased procedure’
, Journal of Special Education26(3),
269-280
.
32.
Robson, C.2004: Real world research, (2nd ed.).
Oxford: Blackwell
.
33.
Slattery, D.
2005:
‘Dynamic assessment: building bridges for multiprofessional working’
, Presentation, IACEP 10th International Conference,
University of Durham, UK.
34.
Spector, J. E.1992‘Predicting progress in beginning reading: dynamic assessment of
phonemic awareness’
, Journal of Educational Psychology84(3),
353-363
.
35.
Sternberg, R. J.
and
Grigorenko, E. L.2001‘All testing is dynamic testing’
, Issues in Education7(2),
137-170
.
36.
Tzuriel, D.
and
Klein, P. S.1987‘Assessing the young child: children’s analogical
thinking modifiability’, in
C. S. Lidz
, (ed.), Dynamic assessment: an interactional approach to evaluating
learning potential.
New York: Guilford Press
.
37.
Tzuriel, D.
and
Caspi, N.1992‘Cognitive modifiability and cognitive performance of deaf and
hearing pre-school children’
, Journal of Special Education26(3),
235-252
.
38.
Vygotsky, L. S.1978‘Mind in society’ in
M. Cole
,
V. John-Steiner
,
S. Scribner
, and
E. Souberman
, (eds), The development of higher psychological processes.
London: Harvard University Press
.
39.
Waters, J.
and
Stringer, P.1997‘The bunny bag: a dynamic approach to the assessment of
pre-school children’
, Educational and Child Psychology14(4),
33-45
.
