Abstract
A survey was conducted from April to May 2015, in private and public primary schools of Montpellier to compare pupils knowledge about oral hygiene, with and without school-based educational programmes. The aim of this study was to test the efficiency of such prevention programmes.
A survey was conducted from April to May 2015, in private and public primary schools of Montpellier to compare pupils knowledge about oral hygiene, with and without school-based educational programmes. The aim of this study was to test the efficiency of such prevention programmes.
Methods: Two schools were randomly selected from the 5th and 6th years (49.5% of 5th year and 50.5% of 6th year). A total of 204 children (90 from public and 114 from private schools) participated in this study: 55% boys, 45% girls. They were randomly divided in two groups (test and control). A first questionnaire (A) was distributed to all the children to evaluate their knowledge at baseline. Then a first intervention programme was implemented in the test group. The same intervention was repeated 1 month later. Then all the children, from the test and control groups, were asked again to fill in the same questionnaire (A). The primary endpoint was a score (from 0 to 14), corresponding to the number of correct answers.
Results: The mean age was 10.4 in the control group and 10.2 in the test group with no significant difference (p=0.24). In the test group, the scores were significantly increased after the intervention programme. In the control group, the difference was not significant. ANOVA showed that gender was not significant (p=0.38), but the type of school was significant (p=0.002): the scores were greater in private schools (p<0.0001).
Conclusion: This primary school survey confirms the impact of school-based programmes on childrens knowledge of oral prevention. Moreover, such preventive programmes could ideally become part of the school curriculum.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
