Language tests employing methods which are not fair to all test takers are unethi cal. Equally, uses of language tests which aim to exercise control and manipulate stakeholders rather than provide information regarding proficiency levels are also unethical. Ways of reducing these sources of unfairness are discussed and language testers are urged to exercise vigilance at all times to ensure that the tests they develop are democratic and fair.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Gordon, C.1987: The effect of the testing method on achievement in reading comprehension tests in English as a foreign language. Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University. M.A. Thesis.
2.
Hankock, C.1994: Teaching, testing and assessing: making the connection . Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook .
3.
Liskin-Gasparro, J.1995: Practical approaches to outcomes assessment. The undergraduate major in foreign languages and literature. ADFL Bulletin26, 21-27.
4.
Lynch, B. and Davidson, F.1994: Criterion-referenced language test development: linking curricula, teachers, and tests. TESOL Quarterly28, 727-43.
5.
Ong, W.1982: Orality and literacy. London: Methuen.
6.
Shohamy, E.1983: The stability of the oral proficiency trait on the oral interview speaking tests. Language Learning33, 527-39.
7.
— 1984: Does the testing method make a difference? The case of reading comprehension. Language Testing1, 147-80.
8.
— 1993: The power of tests. The impact of language tests on teaching and learning. Washington, DC: NFLC Occasional papers.
9.
— 1994: The validity of direct versus semi-direct oral tests. Language Testing11, 99-124.
10.
Shohamy, E., Donitze-Schmidt, S. and Ferman, I.1996: Test impact revisited: washback effect over time . Language Testing13, 298-317.
11.
Shohamy, E., Donitze-Schmidt, S. and Waizer, R.1993: The effect of the elicitation method on the language samples obtained on oral tests. Paper presented at the annual Language Testing Colloquium, Cambridge, UK.
12.
Shohamy, E. and Inbar, O.1991: Construct validation of listening comprehension tests: The effect of text and question type. Language Testing8, 23-40.
13.
Shohamy, E., Reves, T. and Bejerano, Y.1986: Introducing a new comprehensive test of oral proficiency . English Language Teaching Journal40, 212-20.
14.
Shohamy, E. and Stansfield, C.1991: The Hebrew Oral Test: an example of international cooperation. AILABulletin7.
15.
Stansfield, C. and Kenyon, D.1988: Development of the Portuguese Speaking Test. Year one project report on development of semi-direct tests of oral proficiency in Hausa, Hebrew, Indonesian and Portuguese. Alexandria, VA : ERIC Document Reproduction Service ED 296 586 .
