Abstract
The past decade has coincided with the increasing use of English language testing in Australia for nonlinguistic purposes, frequently in contexts governed by signifi cant political pressures. This article explores two recent examples: the access: test (Australian Assessment of Communicative English Skills), a form of ESL testing designed actively to regulate the flow of skilled migrants to Australia; and the step test (Special Test of English Proficiency), a test ostensibly designed to assess linguistic competence, but in fact structured to play a central role in the determi nation of asylum seekers' residential status. This article explores the pragmatic considerations which can give rise to such test development. Its conclusion is that macropolitical pressures can have a profound impact on test design, administration and outcomes, and as such warrant detailed ethical consideration from applied lin guists.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
