Tests have always been used as a means of political and social control. Critics have emphasized their unfairness and what Edgeworth called their 'unavoidable uncertainty'. Test results are unreliable, especially at the extremes, and their pre dictive power is weak. Language testers above all need to be sceptical; they should insist that the most complete information about candidates be made available for selection decision-making.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Edgeworth, F.Y.1888: The statistics of examinations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society51, 599-635.
2.
— 1890: The element of chance in competitive examinations . Journal of the Royal Statistical Society53, 644-63.
3.
Franke, W.1960: The reform and abolition of the traditional Chinese examination system. Harvard University Center for East Asian Studies , Cambridge, MA, mimeo.
— 1853: Hansard's parliamentary debates. London : Cornelius Buck.
6.
Latham, H.1877: On the action of examinations considered as a means of selection. Cambridge: Deighton, Bell & Co.
7.
Madaus, G.P.1990; Testing as a social technology. The inaugural annual Boise lecture on education and public policy, Boston College, MA.
8.
Madaus, G.F. and Kellaghan, T.1991: Student examination systems in the European Community: lessons for the United States. Contractor report submitted tothe Office of Technology Assessment, United States Congress.
9.
Roach, J.1971: Public examinations in England 1850-1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Spolsky, B.1995: Measured words: the development of objective language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
