Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 1994-11
Prediction of global ratings of fluency and delivery in narrative discourse by linguistic and phonetic measures- oral performances of students aged 11-12 years
Backlund, P., Brown, K.L., Gurry, J. and Jandt, F.1982: Recommendations for assessing speaking and listening skills . Communication Education31, 9-17.
2.
Barker, L.L.1968: Two investigations of the relationship among selected ratings of speech effectiveness and comprehension. New York: Speech Association of America.
3.
Becker, S.L.1962: The rating of speeches: scale independence. Speech Monographs29, 38-44.
4.
Boves, L.1984: The phonetic basis of perceptual ratings of running speech . Dordrecht: Foris.
5.
Broeder, D.1989: Analysis and synthesis of speech: documentation SESAM (report 14). Amsterdam: Stichting spraaktechnologie (in Dutch). Bühler, K.1934: Sprachtheorie. Jena: Fischer.
6.
— 1982: The axiomatization of the language sciences. In Innis, R.E., editor, Karl Bühler: semiotic foundations of language theory. New York: Plenum Press.
7.
Butcher, A.1981: Phonetic correlates of perceived tempo in reading and spontaneous speech. Work in Progress, University of Reading3, 105-17.
8.
Butterworth, B.1975: Hesitation and semantic planning in speech. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research4, 75-87.
9.
Chafe, W.L.1980: The deployment of consciousness in the production of a narrative. In Chafe, W.L., editor, The pear stories: cognitive, cultural and linguistic aspects of narrative production. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
10.
— 1982: Integration and involvement in speaking, writing and oral literature. In Tannen, D., editor, Spoken and written language: exploring orality and literacy. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
11.
— 1986: Writing in the perspective of speaking. In Cooper, C.R. and Greenbaum, S., editors, Studying writing: linguistic approaches. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
12.
Clark, H.H. and Gerrig, RJ1990: Quotations as demonstrations. Language66, 764-805.
13.
Crystal, D.1969: Prosodic systems and intonation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14.
Crystal, D. and Davy, D.1979: Advanced conversational English. London : Longman.
15.
Gelderen, A. van1987: Differential rating of performances on oral tasks in a large-scale survey in The Netherlands. Paper presented at the international oracy convention at Norwich (ERIC Document Reproduction Service, ED 300851).
16.
— 1992: The evaluation of speaking ability in communicative situations: global rating and detailed analysis of oral performance of students of 11 to 12 years of age (SCO report 303). Dissertation, University of Amsterdam (in Dutch).
17.
Gorman, T.P., White, J., Brooks, G., Orchard, L., Tate, A. and Sexton, B.1981-84: Language performance in schools: primary and secondary survey reports (1979-1982). Department of Education and Science, Department of Education for Northern Ireland, Welsh Office. London: HMSO.
18.
Guilford, J.P.1954: Psychometric methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.
19.
Hart, J. 't, Collier, R. and Cohen, A.1990: A perceptual study of intonation: an experimental-phonetic approach to speech melodyCambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Hays, W.L.1977: Statistics for the social sciences. London: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
21.
Henderson, A., Goldman-Eisler, F. and Skarbek, A.1966: Sequential temporal patterns in spontaneous speech. Language and Speech9, 207-16.
22.
Hitchman, PJ1965: The testing of spoken English: a review of research. Educational Research7, 55-72.
23.
Jöreskog, K.G. and Sörbom, D.G.1986: Lisrel VI: analysis of linear structural relationships by the method of maximum likelihood, instrumental variables and least squares methods. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.
24.
Kowal, S., O'Connell, D.C. and Sabin, E.J.1975: Development of temporal patterning and vocal hesitations in spontaneous narratives. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research4, 195-207.
25.
Ladd, D.R.1986: Intonational phrasing: the case for recursive prosodic structure. Phonology Yearbook3, 311-40.
26.
Lashbrook, W.B.1968: The effects of training and proficiency in public speaking on the dimensionality of speech evaluation. Speech Communication Research Laboratory, Department of Speech, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan (ERIC Document Reproduction Service, ED 021842).
27.
Levelt, W.1983: Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition14, 41-104.
28.
— 1989: Speaking: from intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29.
MacLure, M. and Hargreaves, M.1986: Speaking and listening: assessment at age 11. Windsor: NFER-NELSON.
30.
Massachusetts State Department of Education1980: Massachusetts assessment of basic skills 1979-1980: technical report listening, speaking (ERIC Document Reproduction Service, ED 197402).
31.
Nunnally, J.C.1967: Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
32.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. and Svartik, J.1972: A grammar of contemporary English. London: Longman.
33.
Redeker, G.1986: Language use in informal narratives: effects of social distance and listener involvement. Dissertation, Catholic University Brabant.
34.
Riggenbach, H.1991: Toward an understanding of fluency: a micro-analysis of nonnative speaker conversations. Discourse Processes14, 423-41.
35.
Rijlaarsdam, G.C.W. and Bronkhorst, H.1983: Judging classroom speeches: construction and test of analytic schemes for rating classroom speeches (SCO report 21). Amsterdam: SCO (in Dutch).
36.
Rubin, R.1982: Assessing speaking and listening competence at the college level: the communication competence assessment instrument. Communication Education31, 19-32.
37.
Rubin, D.L., Daly, J., McCroskey, J.C. and Mead, N.A.1982: A review and critique of procedures for assessing speaking and listening skills among preschool through grade twelve students. Communication Education31, 285-303.
38.
Saal, F.E., Downey, R.G. and Lahey, M.A.1980: Rating the ratings: assessing the psychometric quality of rating data. Psychological Bulletin88, 413-28.
39.
Schiffrin, D.1987: Discourse markers. New York: Cambridge University Press.
40.
Segal, E.M., Duchan, J.F. and Scott, P.J.1991: The role of interclausal connectives in narrative structuring: evidence from adult's interpretations of simple stories. Discourse Processes14, 27-54.
41.
Selkirk, E.O.1984: Phonology and syntax: the relation between sound and structure . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
42.
Son, R.J.J.H. van1992: Form, documentation (report 118). Amsterdam: Institute of Phonetic Sciences, University of Amsterdam.
43.
Temple, J.M. de, Wu, H.-F. and Snow, C.E. (1991). Papa pig just left for pigtown: children's oral and written picture descriptions under varying instructions. Discourse Processes14, 469-95.
44.
Tielen, M.T.J.1992: Male and female speech: an experimental study on sex-related voice and pronunciation characteristics. Dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
45.
Vogten, L.L.M.1985: LVS - speech processing programs on IPO-VAX 11/780 (manual 67). Eindhoven: Institute for Perception Research.
46.
Wesdorp, H.1981: Evaluation techniques for mothertongue education. Den Haag: Staatsuitgeverij, RITP, SVO (in Dutch).
47.
Wilkinson, A. and Stratta, L.1969: The evaluation of spoken language. Educational Review21, 183-95.