Adams, R.J. , Griffin, P.E. and Martin , L.1987: A latent trait method for measuring a dimension in second language proficiencyLanguage Testing4, 9-27.
2.
Alderson, J.C.1986: Computers in language testing In Leech, G. and Candlin, C., editors, Computers in English language teaching and research, London: Longman.
3.
Bachman, L.F.1990: Fundamental considerations in language testingOxford: Oxford University Press.
4.
Bachman, L.F. , Davidson, F. and Foulkes , J.1990: A comparison of the abilities measured by the Cambridge and Educational Testing Service EFL Test BatteriesIssues in Applied Linguistics1, 30-55.
5.
Bachman, L.F. , Davidson, F., Ryan , K. and Choi, I-C.forthcoming: An investigation into the comparability of two tests of English as a foreign language: the Cambridge-TOEFL comparability study: final reportCambridge: University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate.
6.
Bachman, L.F. and Palmer, A.S.1981: The construct validation of the FSI oral interviewLanguage Learning31, 67-86.
7.
Bachman, L.F. and Palmer, A.S.1982: The construct validation of some components of communicative proficiencyTESOL Quarterly16, 449-65.
8.
Bejar, I.I.1980: A procedure for investigating the unidimensionality of achievement tests based on item parameter estimatesJournal of Educational Measurement17, 283-96.
9.
— 1988: An approach to assessing unidimensionality revisitedApplied Psychological Measurement12, 377-79.
10.
Canale, M.1983: On some dimensions of language proficiency In Oller, J.W. Jr., editor, Issues in language testing research.Rowley, MA: Newbury House , 333-42.
11.
Canale, M. . and Swain, M.1980: Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testingApplied Linguistics1, 1-47.
12.
Carroll, J.B.1983: Psychometric theory and language testing In Oller, J.W. Jr., editor, Issues in Language Testing Research.Rowley, MA: Newbury House , 80-107.
13.
Chen, Z. and Henning, G.1985: Linguistic and cultural bias in language proficiency testsLanguage Testing2, 155-63.
14.
Choi, I-C.1992: Theoretical studies in second language acquisition: an application of item response theory to language testingNew York: Peter Lang Publishing.
15.
Cowell, W.R.1982: Item-response theory pre-equating in the TOEFL testing program In Holland, P.W. and Rubin, D.B., editors, Test equating.New York: Academic Press, 149-61.
16.
Davidson, F.1988: An exploratory modeling survey of the trait structures of some existing language test data sets. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertationDepartment of Applied Linguistics, University of California , Los Angeles.
17.
Davidson, F. and Henning, G.1985: A self-rating scale of English proficiency: Rasch scalar analysis of items and rating categoriesLanguage Testing2, 164-79.
18.
de Jong, J.H.A.L.1986: Item selection from pretests in mixed ability groups In Stansfield, C.W., editor, Technology and language testing.Washington, DC: TESOL, 91-108.
19.
de Jong, J.H.A.L. and Glas, C.A.W.1987: Validation of listening comprehension tests using item response theoryLanguage Testing4, 170-94.
20.
Drasgow, F. . and Parsons, C.K.1983: Application of unidimensional psychological item response theory models to multidimensional dataApplied Psychological Measurement7, 189-99.
21.
Goldestein, H. and Blinkhorn, S.1977: Monitoring educational standards-an inappropriate modelBulletin of the British Psychological Society30, 309-11.
22.
Griffin, P.1985: The use of latent trait models in the calibration of tests of spoken language in large-scale selection-placement programs In Lee, Y.P., Fok, A.C.Y.Y., Lord, R. and Low, G., editors, New directions in language testing.Oxford: Pergamon Press, 149-61.
23.
Gustafsson, J.E.1980: Testing and obtaining fit of data to the Rasch modelBritish Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology33, 205-33.
24.
Hambleton, R.K. and Swaminathan, H.1985: Item response theory: principles and applicationsBoston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.
25.
Hambleton, R.K. and Murray, L.1983: Some goodness of fit investigations for item response models In Hambleton, R.K., editor, Applications of item response theory.Vancouver: Educational Research Institute of British Columbia.
26.
Harley, B. , Allen, J.B., Cummins , J. and Swain, M.1987 : The development of bilingual proficiency: final reportToronto: Modern Language Centre , Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
27.
Hattie, J.A.1985: Methodology review: Assessing unidimensionality of test and itemsApplied Psychological Measurement9, 139-64.
28.
Henning, G.1984: Advantages of latent trait measurement in language testingLanguage Testing1, 237-41.
29.
1986 : Item Banking via DBASE II: The UCLA ESL Proficiency Examination Experience In Stansfield, C.W., editor, Technology and Language Testing.Washington, DC: TESOL, 69-77.
30.
— 1987a: A guide to language testingCambridge, MA: Newbury House.
31.
1987b: Is the Bejar test of unidimensionality appropriate? A response to SpurlingLanguage Testing4, 96-98.
32.
1988: The influence of test and sample dimensionalityLanguage Testing5, 83-99.
33.
1989: Meanings and implications of the principle of local independenceLanguage Testing6, 95-108.
34.
Henning, G.T. and Davidson, F.1987: Scalar analysis of composition ratings In Bailey, K.M., Dale, T.L. and Clifford, R.T., editors, Language Testing Research: Selected Papers from the 1986 Colloquium.Monterey: Defense Language Institute , 24-38.
35.
Henning, G.T. , Hudson, T. and Turner , J.1985: Item response theory and the assumption of unidimensionalityLanguage Testing2, 141-54.
36.
Hicks, Marilyn M.1984: A comparative study of methods of equating TOEFL test scoresPrinceton: Educational Testing Service.
37.
Hulin, C.L. , Drasgow, F. and Parsons , C.K.1983: Item response theory: application to psychological measurementHomewood, IL: Dow Jones-Irwin.
38.
Humphreys, L.G.1952: Individaul differences In Stone, C.P. and Taylor, D., editors, Annual Review of Psychology 3, 131-47.
39.
1962: The organization of human abilitiesAmerican Psychologist17, 475-83.
40.
1970 : A skeptical look at the factor pure test In Lunneborg, C.E., editor, Current problems and techniques in multivariate psychology: proceedings of a conference honoring Professor Paul Horst.Seattle: University of Washington.
41.
Junker, B.1988: Users' Guide to Computer Programs for Stout's Unidimensionality Statistic. MonographUrbana, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
42.
Larson, J.W.1987: Computerized adaptive language testing: a Spanish placement exam In Bailey, K.M., Dale, T.L. and Clifford, R.T., editors, Language testing research: selected papers from the 1986 colloquium.Monterey: Defense Language Institute, 1-10.
43.
Lord, F.M. and Novick, M.R.1968: Statistical theories of mental test scoresReading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
44.
Madsen, H.S. and Larson, J.W.1986: Computerized Rasch analysis of item bias in ESL tests In Stansfield, C.W., editor, Technology and language testing.Washington, DC: Teachers of English to speakers of other languages, 47-67.
45.
McNamara, T.F.1990: Item response theory and the validation of an ESP test for health professionalsLanguage Testing7, 52-76.
46.
Mislevy, R.J. and Bock, R.D.1990: BILOG: item analyses and test scoring with binary logistic models, Version 3Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software, Inc.
47.
Mislevy, R.J. and Stocking, M.L.1989: A consumer guide to LOGIST and BILOGApplied Psychological Measurement13, 57-75.
48.
Perkins, K. and Miller, L.D.1984: Comparative analyses of English as a second language reading comprehension data: classical test theory and IRTLanguage Testing1, 21-32.
49.
Pollitt, A. and Hutchinson , C.1987: Calibrating graded assessments: Rasch partial credit analysis of performance in writingLanguage Testing4, 71-92.
50.
Reckase, M.D.1979: Unifactor latent trait models applied to multifactor tests: Results and implicationsJournal of Educational Statistics4, 207-30.
51.
Sang, F. , Schmitz, B., Vollmer , J.J., Baumert, J. and Roeder, P.M.1986: Models of second language competence: a structural equation approachLanguage Testing3, 54-79.
52.
Spurling, S.1987a: Questioning the use of the Bejar method to determine unidimensionalityLanguage Testing4, 93-95.
53.
— 1987b: The Bejar method with an example: a comment on Henning's 'Response to Spurling'Language Testing4, 221-24.
54.
Stout, William.1987: A nonparametric approach for assessing latent trait unidimensionalityPsychometrika52, 589-617.
55.
Tatsuoka, K.K.1990: Toward an integration of item-response theory and cognitive error diagnoses In Fredericksen, Glaser, Lesgold and Shafto, editors, Diagnostic monitoring of skill and knowledge acquisition , Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
56.
Theunissen, T.J.J.M.1987: Text banking and test designLanguage Testing4, 1-8.
57.
Tung, P.1986: Computerized adaptive testing: implications for language test developers In Stansfield, C.W., editor, Technology and language testing, 11-28.
58.
Whitely, S.E.1977: Models, meanings and misunderstandings: some issues in applying Rasch's theoryJournal of Educational Measurement14, 227-35.
59.
Wingersky, M.S.1983: LOGIST: A program for computing maximum likelihood procedures for logistic test models In Hambleton, R.K., editor, Applications of item response theory. Vancouver : Educational Research Institute of British Columbia , 45-56.
60.
Wood, R.1978: Fitting the Rasch model-A heady taleBritish Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology31, 27-32.