Alderman, D.L. and Holland, P.W.1981: Item performance across native language groups on the Test of English as a Foreign LanguagePrinceton: Educational Testing Service.
2.
Alderson, J.C. and Urquhart, A.H.1985: The effect of students' academic discipline on their performance on ESP reading testsLanguage Testing2, 192-204.
3.
Angoff, W.1989: Context bias in the Test of English as a Foreign LanguagePrinceton: Educational Testing Service.
4.
Bachman, L.F.1990: Fundamental considerations in language testingOxford: Oxford University Press.
5.
Bachman, L.F. , Davidson, F., Ryan , K. and Choi, I.-C. . forthcoming: The Cambridge-TOEFL comparability study: final reportCambridge: University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate.
6.
Bachman, L.F. , Kunnan, A., Vanniarajan , S. and Lynch, B.1988 : Task and ability analysis as a basis for examining content and construct comparability in two EFL proficiency test batteriesLanguage Testing5, 128-59.
7.
Briere, E.1968: Testing ESL among Navajo children In Upshur, J.A. and Fata, J., editors, Problems in foreign language testing. Language Learning Special Issue No. 3. Ann Arbor : Research Club in Language Learning.
8.
Erickson, J. and Molloy, J.1983: ESP test development for engineering students In Oller, J.W., editor, Issues in language testing research.Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 280-88.
9.
Farhady, H.1982: Justification, development and validation of functional language tests. Unpublished PhD. dissertation, UCLA.
10.
Hale, G.A.1988: The interaction of student major-field group and text content in TOEFL reading comprehensionPrinceton : Educational Testing Service.
11.
Henning, G.1990: National issues in individual assessment: the consideration of specialization bias in university language screening tests In de Jong, J.H.A.L. and Stevenson, D.K., editors, Individualizing the assessment of language abilities.Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 38-50.
12.
Holland, P.W.1985: On the study of differential item difficulty without IR TProceedings of the Military Testing Association, October 1985.
13.
Holland, P.W. and Thayer, D.1986: Differential item performance and the Mantel-Haenszel procedure ETS Research Report No. 86-31. Princeton : Educational Testing Service.
14.
Holland, P.W. and Thayer, D.1988: Differential item performance and the Mantel-Haenszel procedure In Wainer, H. and Braun, H.I., editors, Test Validity. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15.
Linn, R.L. and Harnisch, D.1984: Interactions between item content and group membership on achievement test itemsJournal of Educational Measurement18, 108-18.
16.
Linn, R.L. , Levin, M., Hastings , C.N. and Wardrop, J.L.1981: Item bias in a test of reading comprehensionApplied Psychological Measurement5, 159-73.
17.
Mantel, N. and Haenszel, W.1959: Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of diseaseJournal of the National Cancer Institute22, 719-48.
18.
McPeek, W.M. and Wild, C.1986: Performance of the Mantel-Haenszel statistic in a variety of situationsPaper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, April, 1986.
19.
Oltman, P.K. , Stricker, L.J. and Barrows , T.1988: Native language, English proficiency and the structure of the Test of English as a Foreign LanguagePrinceton: Educational Testing Service.
20.
Phillips, A. and Holland, P.1987: Estimators of the variance of the Mantel-Haenszel logs-odds-ratio estimateBiometrics43, 425-31.
21.
Politzer, R.L. and McGroarty, M.1985: An exploratory study of learning behaviors and their relationship to gains in linguistic and communicative competenceTESOL Quarterly19, 103-23.
22.
Ryan, K.1990: The performance of the Mantel-Haenszel procedurePaper given at the American Educational Research Association , Boston, April 1990.
23.
SAS Institute Incorporated1988: SAS language guide for personal computers, version 6.03 editionCary, NC: SAS, Inc.
24.
Schmitt, A.1988: Language and cultural characteristics that explain differential item functioningJournal of Educational Measurement25, 1-13.
25.
Scheuneman, J.D. and Gerritz , K.1990: Using differential item functioning procedures to explore sources of item difficulty and group performance characteristicsJournal of Educational Measurement27, 109-31.
26.
Spurling, S. and Ilyin, D.1985: The impact of learner variables on language test performanceTESOL Quarterly19, 283-301.
27.
Swaminathan, H. and Rogers, J.1990: Detecting differential item functioning using logistic regression proceduresJournal of Educational Measurement27, 361-70.
28.
Swinton, S. and Powers, D.1980: Factor Analysis of the Test of English as a Foreign Language for Several GroupsPrinceton: Educational Testing Service.
29.
Zwick, R. and Ercikan, K.1989: Analysis of differential item functioning in the NAEP history assessmentJournal of Educational Measurement26, 55-66.