A report written by J.O. Roach in 1945 for the University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate appears to have been one of the first discussions in print of the problems of reliability and validity in the testing of oral proficiency in a second language. It describes a number of experiments in improving consistency in examiner's rating by joint examining and by the use of recorded samples, considers the problems of establishing valid standards in subjective testing, and proposes the development of what is now the standard form of listening comprehension test.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Clark, J.L.D., editor, 1978: Direct testing of speaking proficiency: theory and application. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
2.
Dyer, H.S.1954: Testing by ear. The College Board Review . (May 1954).
3.
Hartog, P. and Rhodes, E.C.1935: An examination of examinations, being a summary of investigations on comparison of marks allotted to examination scripts by independent examiners and boards of examiners, together with a section of viva voce examinations . London: Macmillan.
4.
Hughes, A., 1989: Testing for language teachers. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
5.
Jones, R.L.1979: The Oral Interview of the Foreign Service Institute. In Spolsky, B. editor: Some major tests: Advances in Language Testing Series: 1. Arlington, VA.: Center for Applied Linguistics.
6.
Lowe, Jr, P.1988: The unassimilated history. In Lowe, Jr., P., and Stansfield, C.W. editors: Second language proficiency assessment: current issues. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents.
7.
Pennycook, A.1989: The concept of method, interested knowledge, and the politics of language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 23: 589-618.
8.
Phillipson, R.1990: English language teaching and imperialism. Tronninge, Denmark: Transcultura.
9.
Richards, J.C.1984: The secret life of methods. TESOL Quarterly , 18: 7-23.
10.
Raatz, U.1981: Are oral tests tests? In Klein-Braley, C. and Stevenson, D. editors: Practice and problems in language testing. Frankfurt-am-Main: Verlag Peter D. Lang.
11.
Rice, F.1959: The Foreign Service Institute tests language proficiency . Linguistic Reporter, 1: 2,4.
12.
Roach, J.O.1936: The reliability of school certificate results. Oversea Education: a Journal of Educational Experiment and Research in Tropical and Subtropical Areas. 7: 113-8.
13.
Roach, J.O.1945. Some problems of oral examinations in modern languages: an experimental approach based on the Cambridge Examinations in English for foreign students, being a report circulated to oral examiners and local examiners for those examinations. Cambridge: Local Examinations Syndicate.
14.
Roach, J.O.1971: Public examinations in England 1850-1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Sollenberger, H.1978: Development and current use of the FSI Oral Interview Test. In ClarkL.D. editor: Direct testing of speaking proficiency, theory and application. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
16.
Spolsky, B.1977: 'Language testing: art or science' in Nickel, G. editor: Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress of Applied Linguistics. Stuttgart: Hochschulverlag. Volume 3.
17.
Spolsky, B.1981: Some ethical questions about language testing. In Klein-Braley, C. and Stevenson, D., editors: Practice and problems in language testing. Frankfurt-am-Main: Verlag Peter D. Lang.
18.
Spolsky, B.1990: The Prehistory of TOEFL. Language Testing , 7: 98-118.
19.
Strevens, P. 1989: Comments on Bachman, L. et al., Final report of the Cambridge-TOEFL Comparability Study. Mimeo.
20.
Wilds, C.P.1975: The Oral Interview Test. In Jones, R.L. and Spolsky, B. editors: Testing language proficiency. Arlington, VA: Center for Applied Linguistics.
