Traditional reading tests have been subject to mounting criticism of various kinds. This article discusses some of these criticisms and the ways in which an alternative approach - namely, the short-context technique - avoids these defects. It then reports on an attempt to construct a short-context test and the examination of its validity. The results show sufficient evidence substantiating the short-context test as an authentic measure of reading ability.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alderson, J.C.1981: Report of the discussion on communicative language testing . In Alderson, J.C. and Hughes, A., editors, ELT documents III - issues in language testing, London: The British Council.
2.
— 1983: The cloze procedure and proficiency in English as a foreign language. In Oller, J.W. Jr., editor, Issues in language testing, Rowley: Newbury House.
3.
Alderson, J.C. and Urquhart, A.H.1983: The effect of student background discipline and comprehension: a pilot study. In Hughes, A. and Porter, D., editors, Current developments in language testing, London: Academic Press.
4.
— 1985: The effect of students' academic discipline on their performance on ESP reading tests. Language Testing2, 192-204.
Anderson, J.1976: Psycholinguistic experiments in foreign language testing . Queensland: University of Queensland Press.
7.
Angelis, P.J.1977: Language testing and intelligence testing: friends or foes? In Redden, J., editor, Proceedings of the first international conference on frontiers in language proficiency and dominance testing, Carbondale : Southern Illinois University.
8.
Aron, H.1986: The influence of background knowledge on memory for reading passages by native and nonnative readers. TESOL Quarterly20, 136-40.
9.
Baudoin, L., Margaret, E., Bober, E.S., Clarke, M.A., Dobson, B.K. and Silberstein, S.1977: Reader's choice: a reading skills textbook for students of English as a second language. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
10.
Bensoussan, M.1984: A comparison of cloze and multiple-choice reading comprehension tests of English as a foreign language. Language Testing1, 101-104.
11.
Bickley, A.C., Weaver, W.W. and Ford, F.G.1968: Information removed from multiple-choice item responses by selected grammatical categories. Psychological Reports23, 613-14.
12.
Carrell, P.L.1984: The effects of rhetorical organization on ESL readers . TESOL Quarterly18, 441-69.
13.
— 1985: Facilitating ESL reading by teaching text structure. TESOL Quarterly19, 727-52.
14.
Carrell, P.L. and Eisterhold, J.C.1983. Schema theory and ESL reading pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly17, 553-73.
15.
Carroll, J.B.1971: Development of native language skills beyond the early years. In Read, C.E., editor, The learning of language, New York: Appleton Century Crofts.
16.
— 1972: Defining language comprehension: some speculations. In Carroll, J.B. and Freedle, R.O., editors, Language comprehension and the acquisition of knowledge, Washington, D.C.: Winston & Sons.
17.
— 1983: Psychometric theory and language testing. In Oller, J.W. Jr., editor, Issues in language testing research, Rowley: Newbury House.
18.
Carver, R.P.1973: Reading as reasoning: implications for measurement. In MacGinitie, W.H., editor, Assessment problems in reading, Newark: International Reading Association.
19.
CEEB (College Entrance Examination Board) 1977:5 descriptive tests of language skills. New Jersey: Educational Testing Service.
20.
Chen, Z. and Henning, G.1985. Linguistic and cultural bias in language proficiency tests . Language Testing2, 155-63.
21.
Corrigan, A. et al. 1978. English placement test, Forms A, B, and C. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.
22.
Cronbach, L.J. and Meehl, P.E.1955: Construct validity in psychological tests. PsychologicalBulletin52, 281-302.
23.
Davis, F.B.1971: Psychometric research on comprehension in reading. In Davis, F.B., editor, The literature of research in reading with emphasis on models: final report. New Brunswick: The State University.
24.
Derville, L.M.T.1966: The use of psychology in teaching. Longmans.
25.
Farr, R.1969: Reading: what can be measured?Newark : International Reading Association.
26.
Goodman, K.S.1973: Testing in reading: a general critique. In Ruddell, R.B., editor, Accountability and reading instruction: current issues. Urbana: National Council Teachers of English.
27.
Harris, D.P.1965. A vocabulary and reading test for students of English as a second language, Form A, revised edition. Washington, D.C.: American Language Institute, Georgetown University.
28.
— 1975: Testing reading comprehension in ESL: background and current state of the art. In Morley, J., editor, Papers in ESL: selected conference papers of the Association of Teachers of English as a second language. Washington, D.C.: NAFSA.
29.
Hunt, L.C.1957: Can we measure specific factors associated with reading comprehension?Journal of Educational Research51, 161-71.
30.
Jafarpur, A.1980: An analysis of a standard ESOL reading test, including consideration of alternative test procedures. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation . Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University .
31.
Kelly, F.J.1916: The Kansas silent reading tests, Journal of Educational Psychology7, 63-80.
32.
Kretschmer, J.C.1972. Subject matter as a factor in testing comprehension. Reading World11, 275-85.
33.
Lado, R.1986: Analysis of native speaker performance on a cloze test . Language Testing3, 130-46.
34.
Lee, Y.P.1985: Investigating the validity of the cloze score. In Lee, Y.P. et al., editors, New directions in language testing. Pergamon Press.
35.
Markham, P.L.1985: The rational deletion cloze and global comprehension in German. Language Learning35, 423-30.
36.
Meyer, B.J.F.1977: What is remembered from prose: a function of passage structure . In Freedle, R.O., editor, Discourse production and comprehension. New Jersey: Albex Publishing Cor.
37.
— 1982: Reading comprehension and the composition teacher: the importance of plans. College composition and communication33, 37-49.
38.
Meyer, B.J.F. and Freedle, R.O.1984: Effects of discourse type on recall. American Educational Research Journal21, 121-43.
39.
Mitchell, A.S.1968: Value and limitation of standardized reading tests. In Figurel, J.A., editor, Forging ahead in reading. Newark: International Reading Association.
40.
Motta, J., Narano, V. and Bouchard, D.1974: Reading evaluation for adult non-English students. ERIC ED 089-513.
41.
Muggleston, P.1979: Some reading tasks facing the student in an English speaking community. English Language Teaching Journal33, 139-42.
42.
Oller, J.W. Jr.1979: Language tests at school. London: Longman.
43.
Pauk, W.1969: What should reading tests for high school and college fresh-men measure?Journal of the Reading Specialist1, 2-4.
44.
Perkins, K. and Jones, B.1985: Measuring passage contribution in ESL reading comprehension . TESOL Quarterly19, 137-53.
45.
Phillips, J.K.1978: Reading is communication, too?Foreign Language Annals11, 281-87.
46.
Porter, D.1978. Cloze procedure and equivalence. Language Learning28, 333-41.
47.
— 1983: The effect of quantity of context on the ability to make linguistic predictions: a flaw in a measure of general proficiency. In Hughes, A. and Porter, D., editors, Current developments in language testing . London: Academic Press.
48.
Pyrczak, F.1974: Passage-dependence of items designed to measure the ability to identify the main ideas of paragraphs: implications for validity. Educational and Psychological Measurement34, 343-48.
49.
Pyrczak, F. and Axelrod, J.1976: Determining the passage dependence of reading comprehension exercises: a call for replication. Journal of Reading19, 279-83.
50.
Raatz, U. and Klein-Braley, C.1981: The C-Test - a modification of the cloze procedure. In Culhane, T., Klein-Braley, C., and Stevenson, D.K., editors, Occasional papers: practice and problems in language testing. Colchester: University of Essex.
51.
Raygor, A.L.1970: Reading for significant facts. McGraw-Hill .
Taylor, W.L.1953: Cloze procedure: a new tool for measuring readability . Journalism Quarterly30, 415-33.
54.
Thorndike, E.L.1914: The measurement of ability in reading: preliminary scales and tests. Teachers College Record15, 207-77.
55.
Thurston, L.L.1946. Note on a reanalysis of Davis' reading tests. Psychometrika11, 249-55.
56.
Traxler, A.L.1941. A study of the Van Wagenen-Dvorak diagnostic examination of silent reading abilities. Educational RecordsBulletin31, 33-44.
57.
Tuinman, J.J.1973-74: Determining the passage dependency of comprehension questions in 5 major tests. Reading Research Quarterly9, 206-23.
58.
Upshur, J., Corrigan, A., Dobson, B., Spaan, M. and Strowe, L.1975: Michigan test of English language proficiency, Form O . Ann Arbor: University of Michigan .
59.
Wanat, S.1977: Evaluating reading: an introduction. In Wanat, S.F., editor, Papers in applied linguistics and reading: series 1. Arlington: Center for Applied Linguistics.
