This paper briefly reviews two earlier studies of the effect of student background knowledge on reading comprehension, then goes on to report a third study into the same effect. The paper draws the conclusion that the test results obtained in the study can be accounted for in terms of an interaction between background knowledge and linguistic proficiency. The paper closes with some observations on the broad concepts 'linguistic proficiency' and 'background knowledge'.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alderson, J.C. and Urquhart, A.H.1983: The effect of student background discipline on comprehension: a pilot study. In Hughes, A. and Porter, D., editors, Current developments in language testing, London: Academic Press.
2.
1984 : Student discipline and reading comprehension. In Culhane, T., editor, Practice and problems in language testing, University of Essex Occasional Papers.
3.
forthcoming: 'This test is unfair: I'm not an economist.' In Hauptman, P., LeBlanc, R. and Wesche, M.B., editors, Second language performance testing/Le testing de performance en langue seconde, Ottawa : University of Ottawa Press.
4.
British Council and University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate1980: English Language Testing Service (ELTS). Cambridge and London.
5.
Gregory, D.P.1972: Fuel cells. London: Mills and Boon.
6.
Hulme, B.G.1981: Development of off-shore gas-turbine packages for power generation and mechanical drive. GECJournal of Science and Technology47.
7.
Ingram, E.1967: English language battery. Department of Linguistics, University of Edinburgh.
8.
Latham, A.J.H.1978: The international economy and the underdeveloped world, 1864-1914. London: Croom Helm.
9.
Science Research Associates1963: SRA reading laboratory. Chicago: Science Research Associates Inc.
