Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In most Western European countries, aspiring citizens must pass both a second language (L2) test and a knowledge of society (KoS) test, often administered in the L2. While several studies highlighted the social inequalities such tests may create, few have quantified these disparities. This study, anchored in the IMPECT project, analyses the test results of 79,794 migrants in Norway to explore the implications of these requirements, particularly for adult L2 learners with limited formal education in their first language (L1). Logistic regression analyses reveal that (1) learners with limited formal L1 education have significantly lower probabilities of passing the tests compared to those with higher education; (2) disparities are greater for KoS tests than for the oral A2 language test; (3) L2 scores strongly predict the likelihood of passing KoS tests, substantiating the assumption that KoS tests are implicit language tests; and (4) the impact of language skills on passing KoS tests varies by schooling level, with L2 scores being a stronger predictor for learners with limited education than for those with tertiary degrees. These findings highlight barriers faced by learners with limited L1 schooling in the citizenship acquisition process and underscore the need for targeted policy and support mechanisms.

Keywords

Adult literacy citizenship requirements knowledge of society L2 test performance LESLLA migration multilevel logistic regression

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abadzi

(2003). Improving adult literacy outcomes: Lessons from cognitive research for developing countries. Operations Evaluation Department. World Bank.

Allemano

(2013). Testing the reading ability of low educated ESOL learners. Apples—Journal of Applied Language Studies, 7(1), 67–81.

Altherr Flores

J. A

. (2021). The interplay of text and image on the meaning-making processes of adult L2 learners with emerging literacy: Implications for test design and evaluation frameworks. Language Assessment Quarterly, 18(5), 508–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2021.1984491

Andringa

Godfroid

(2020). Sampling bias and the problem of generalizability in applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 40, 134–142. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190520000033

Bassel

Khan

(2021). Migrant women becoming British citizens: Care and coloniality. Citizenship Studies, 25(4), 583–601. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2021.1926075

Bassel

Monforte

Bartram

Khan

(2021). Naturalization policies, citizenship regimes, and the regulation of belonging in anxious societies. Ethnicities, 21(2), 259–270. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27036071

Bates

Maechler

Bolker

Walker

(2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01

Bigelow

Delmas

Hansen

Tarone

(2006). Literacy and the processing of oral recasts in SLA. TESOL Quarterly, 40(4), 665–689. https://doi.org/10.2307/40264303

Blackmore

Boyle

J. A.

Fazel

Ranasinha

Gray

K. M.

Fitzgerald

Misso

Gibson-Helm

(2020). The prevalence of mental illness in refugees and asylum seekers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Medicine, 17(9), e1003337. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003337

10.

Brinch

Olseth

von Mehren

L. S.

Larsen

I. A.

Cej

Winsnes

(2020). Utredning av hvilke personlige forutsetninger som kan være avgjørende for at en person ikke klarer å bestå prøve i norsk muntlig på nivå B1 [Investigation of which personal conditions that may determine that a person will not be able to pass the oral Norwegian test at the level B1]. Kompetanse Norge.

11.

Carlsen

C. H.

(2017). Giving LESLLA learners a fair chance in testing. LESLLA Symposium Proceedings, 12(1), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8058941

12.

Carlsen

C. H.

(2024). Language testing for residence and citizenship in Europe: Justifications, consequences and debates. In Kunnan

A. J.

(Ed.), The concise companion to language assessment (pp. 401–416). Wiley-Blackwell.

13.

Carlsen

C. H.

Hamidi

(2023). Språklig rasialisering—språk og språkkravs rolle i strukturell rasisme [Linguistic racialisation—language and language requirements in structural racism]. In Bugge

Carlsen

C. H.

(Eds.), Norsk som andrespråk—voksne innvandrere som utvikler skriftkyndighet på et andrespråk [Norwegian as a second language—adult migrants who develop literacy in a second language] (pp. 74–96). Cappelen Damm Akademisk.

14.

Carlsen

C. H.

Rocca

(2021). Language test misuse. Language Assessment Quarterly, 18(5), 477–491. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2021.1947288

15.

Carlsen

C. H.

Rocca

(2023, October 18). Language policy index for migrants (LAPIM) [Paper presentation]. Joint European Association of Language Testing and Assessment (EALTA) and Association of Language Testers in Europe (ALTE) event on Migration, Online.

16.

Carlsen

C. H.

Rocca

Sheils

(2023). Education for integration—the case of adult migrants. In Byram

Fleming

Sheils

(Eds.), Quality and equity in education: Council of Europe policy and implications for teaching for plurilingual, intercultural and democratic citizenship (pp. 180–202). Multilingual Matters.

17.

Chen

Zhang

J. M.

Hort

Harman

Sarro

(2024). Fairness testing: A comprehensive survey and analysis of trends. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 33(5), 1–59. https://doi.org/10.1145/3652155

18.

Council of Europe. (2024, December 18). Global scale—Common reference levels. Council of Europe. https://www.coe.int/en/web/common-european-framework-reference-languages/table-1-cefr-3.3-common-reference-levels-global-scale

19.

Cronbach

L. J.

(1984). Essentials of psychological testing (4th ed.). Harper & Row.

20.

Danish Ministry of Immigration and Integration. (2024). Report to OECD on International Migration (Report to OECD). Ministry of Immigration and Integration. https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/document/download/5abab43c-4667-4938-a3f1-0bbcd0c686e0_en?filename=Report%20to%20OECD%20on%20International%20Migration_en.pdf

21.

Deygers

(2017). Just testing: Applying theories of justice to high-stakes language tests. ITL—International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 168(2), 143–163. https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.00001.dey

22.

Deygers

(in press). Fairness and justice in language assessment. In Chapelle

(Ed.), The encyclopedia of language assessment. Wiley.

23.

Deygers

Bigelow

Lo Bianco

Nadarajan

Tani

(2021). Low print literacy and its representation in research and policy. Language Assessment Quarterly, 18(5), 463–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2021.1903471/FORMAT/EPUB

24.

Duong

P.-T.

Montero Perez

Nguyen

L.-Q.

Desmet

Peters

(2023). The impact of input, input repetition, and task repetition on L2 lexical use and fluency in speaking. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 13(1), 101–124. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.29727

25.

Flege

J. E.

(2018). A non-critical period for second-language learning. In Nyvad

A. M.

Hejná

Højen

Jespersen

A. B.

Sørensen

M. H.

(Eds.), A sound approach to language matters: In honor of Ocke-Schwen Bohn (pp. 501–542). AU Library Scholarly Publishing Services. https://ebooks.au.dk/aul/catalog/book/322

26.

Fortier

A.-M.

(2021). Uncertain citizenship. Manchester University Press.

27.

Frost

McNamara

(2018). Language tests, language policy, and citizenship. In Tollefson

J. W.

Pérez-Milans

(Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language policy and planning (pp. 280–298). Oxford University Press.

28.

Goodman

S. W.

(2011). Controlling immigration through language and country knowledge requirements. West European Politics, 34(2), 235–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2011.546569

29.

Gujord

A.-K. H.

(2023). Who succeeds and who fails? Exploring the role of background variables in explaining the outcomes of L2 language tests. Language Testing, 40(2), 227–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/02655322221100115

30.

Gujord

A.-K. H.

Olsen

A.-M. K.

(2021). Andrespråkslæring kontra framandspråkslæring—framleis eit relevant skilje? [Second language acquisition versus foreign language acquisition—is it still a relevant distinction?]. Norsk pedagogisk tidsskrift, 105(4), 385–396.

31.

Havron

Arnon

(2017). Minding the gaps: Literacy enhances lexical segmentation in children learning to read. Journal of Child Language, 44(6), 1516–1538. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000916000623

32.

Hox

(2010). Multilevel analysis. Techniques and applications (2nd ed.). Routledge.

33.

Huettig

Mishra

R. K.

(2014). How literacy acquisition affects the illiterate mind—A critical examination of theories and evidence. Language and Linguistics Compass, 8(10), 401–427. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12092

34.

Iranpour

Wells

Berle

Saniee

Rostami

Iranpour

Steel

(2024). Effect of traumatic experiences and future threats on executive functioning and verbal fluency amongst Farsi-Dari speaking immigrants, refugees, and asylum seekers. Psychiatry Research Communications, 3(4), 100146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psycom.2023.100146

35.

Jasemi

Gottardo

(2023). Second language acquisition and acculturation: Similarities and differences between immigrants and refugees. Frontiers in Communication, 8, 1159026. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2023.1159026

36.

Juff

(2005). Working memory, second language acquisition and low educated second language and literacy learners. LESLLA Symposium Proceedings, 1(1), 89–104.

37.

Karim

S. A.

(2024). The symbolic violence of citizenship tests: Low-schooled refugees narrate their experience. Citizenship Studies, 28(7), 728–744. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2025.2463659

38.

Khan

(2022). The securitisation of language borders and the (re)production of inequalities. TESOL Quarterly, 56(4), 1458–1470. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3186

39.

Kormos

Košak Babuder

Pižorn

(2019). The role of low-level first language skills in second language reading, reading-while-listening and listening performance: A study of young dyslexic and non-dyslexic language learners. Applied Linguistics, 40(5), 834–858. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy028

40.

Kolinsky

(2014). How learning to read in cognition. In Pollatsek

Treiman

(Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 377–394). Oxford Academic.

41.

Kormos

Smith

(2024). Teaching languages to students with specific learning differences. Multilingual Matters.

42.

Kunnan

A. J.

(2000). Fairness and validation in language assessment: Selected papers from the 19th Language Testing Research Colloquium, Orlando, FL. Cambridge University Press.

43.

Kurvers

van de Craats

van Hout

(2015). Footprints for the future: Cognition, literacy and second language learning by adults. LESLLA Symposium Proceedings, 10(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8024359

44.

Literacy Education and Second Language Learning for Adults (LESLLA). (n.d.). Our vision and mission. https://www.leslla.org/our-vision-and-mission

45.

Marrapodi

(2013). What doesn’t work for the lowest level literacy learners and why? Apples—Journal of Applied Language Studies, 7(1), 7–23. https://apples.journal.fi/article/view/97845

46.

McNamara

Roever

(2006). Psychometric approaches to fairness: Bias and DIF. Language Learning, 56(2), 81–128. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.00381.x

47.

McNamara

(2009). Language tests and social policy. A commentary. In Hogan-Brun

Mar-Molinero

Stevenson

(Eds.). Discourses on language and integration. Critical perspectives on language testing regimes in Europe (pp. 153–164). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.33.12nam

48.

McNamara

Ryan

(2011). Fairness versus justice in language testing: The place of English literacy in the Australian citizenship test. Language Assessment Quarterly, 8(2), 161–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2011.565438

49.

McNamara

(2012). Language assessments as shibboleths: A poststructuralist perspective. Applied Linguistics, 33(5), 564–581, https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ams052

50.

Messick

(1989). Validity. In Linn

R. L.

(Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13–103). American Council on Education.

51.

Mouti

Rocca

(2023). Linguistic integration of adult migrants in Greece and Italy: Language requirements and learning opportunities in L2 Greek and L2 Italian. Social Sciences, 12(12), 668. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12120668

52.

Nordanger

Bugge

(2025). Language learning in liminal spaces: Low literate migrants’ narratives of formal requirements for legal integration. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 46(4), 526–545. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2025.2482061

53.

Nordanger

Egeland

B. L.

(2024). Between a rock and a hard place: Introduction Program teachers’ narrated experiences of residency and citizenship language requirements in Scandinavia. Linguistics & Education, 83, 101332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2024.101332

54.

Norwegian Directorate of Higher Education and Skills. (2025a). Read about the oral communication test. https://prove.hkdir.no/en/norwegian-language-test-a1-b2/read-about-the-test-norwegian-A1-B2/about-the-oral-communication-test

55.

Norwegian Directorate of Higher Education and Skills. (2025b). Read about the test citizenship. https://prove.hkdir.no/en/norwegian-citizenship-test/read-about-the-test-citizenship-test

56.

Norwegian Directorate of Higher Education and Skills. (2025c). Read about the test social studies. https://prove.hkdir.no/en/social-studies-test/read-about-the-test-social-studies

57.

OECD. (2018). Skills on the move: Migrants in the survey of adult skills. https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/skills-on-the-move_9789264307353-en

58.

Pfenninger

S. E.

Singleton

(2019). A critical review of research relating to the learning, use and effects of additional and multiple languages in later life. Language Teaching, 52(4), 419–449. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444819000235

59.

Pochon-Berger

Lenz

(2014). Language requirements and language testing for immigration and integration purposes. A synthesis of academic literature. Research Centre on Multilingualism.

60.

Pruim

Kaplan

D. T.

Horton

N. J.

(2017). The mosaic package: Helping students to “think with data” using R. The R Journal, 9(1), 77–102. https://journal.r-project.org/articles/RJ-2017-024/RJ-2017-024.pdf

61.

Randall

Poe

Slomp

Oliveri

M. E.

(2024). Our validity looks like justice. Does yours? Language Testing, 41(1), 203–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/02655322231202947

62.

Rawls

(2001). Justice as fairness: A restatement ( Kelly

, Ed.). Harvard University Press.

63.

R Core Team. (2024). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/

64.

Rocca

Hamnes Carlsen

Deygers

(2020). Linguistic integration of adult migrants: Requirements and learning opportunities: Report on the 2018 Council of Europe and ALTE survey on language and knowledge of society policies for migrants. Council of Europe. http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-8645967

65.

Rüsseler

Arendt

Münte

T. F.

Mohammadi

Boltzmann

(2021). Literacy affects brain structure-What can we learn for language assessment in low literates? Language Assessment Quarterly, 18(5), 492–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2021.1931231

66.

Ryan

Foster

Fester

Wang

Field

Kearney

Yap

J.R.

(2023). First language literacy and second language oracy: A partial replication of Foster and Skehan (1996). Language Learning, 73(4), 1003–1038. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12557

67.

Sadeghi

Pourhaji

(2021). The contributions of working memory and pre-task explicit instruction to L2 oral performance. System, 96, 102409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102409

68.

Saville

(2009). Language assessment in the management of international migration: A framework for considering the issues. Language Assessment Quarterly, 6(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434300802606499

69.

Schepens

J. J.

Van Hout

R. W. N. M.

Van Der Slik

F. W. P.

(2023). Linguistic dissimilarity increases age-related decline in adult language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 45(1), 167–188. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263122000067

70.

Schildt

(2025). The policy web: A multi-layered analysis of language testing for migration [Doctoral dissertation, Ghent University]. UGent Repository.

71.

Serrano

(2011). The time factor in EFL classroom practice. Language Learning, 61(1), 117–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00591.x

72.

Shohamy

(2001). The power of tests: A critical perspective on the uses of language tests. Routledge.

73.

Shohamy

(2009). Language tests for immigrants. Why language? Why tests? Why citizenship? In Hogan-Brun

Mar-Molinero

Stevenson

(Eds.), Discourses on language and integration: Critical perspectives on language testing regimes in Europe (pp. 45–60). John Benjamins Publishing.

74.

Shohamy

(2022). Critical language testing, multilingualism and social justice. TESOL Quarterly, 56(4), 1445–1457. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3185

75.

Shohamy

McNamara

(2009). Language tests for citizenship, immigration, and asylum. Language Assessment Quarterly, 6(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434300802606440

76.

Strik

Böcker

Luiten

van Oers

(2010). The INTEC project: Synthesis report. Integration and naturalisation tests: The new way to European citizenship. Radboud University.

77.

Strube

van de Craats

van Hout

(2013). Grappling with the oral skills: The learning processes of the low-educated adult second language and literacy learner. Apples—Journal of Applied Language Studies, 7(1), 45–65.

78.

Udlændinge-og Integrationsministeriet. (2022). Infødsretsprøven af 2021: Prøvedeltagere og resultater, November 2021 [The naturalization test of 2021: Test takers and results, November 2021]. Integrationsbarometer.dk

79.

Udlændinge- og Integrationsministeriet. (2024). Infødsretsprøven, November 2023: Prøvedeltagere og beståelsesprocent [The naturalization test. November 2023: Test takers and pass rates]. Integrationsbarometer.dk

80.

UNESCO. (2017). Literacy rates continue to rise from one generation to the next.

81.

UNESCO. (2024). Global education monitoring report 2024/5: Leadership in education—Lead for learning.

82.

UNHRC. (2017). Turn the tide. Refugee education in crisis.

83.

United Nations Department of Economics and Social Affairs. (2021). Classification of countries by region, income group and subregion of the world. In World Population Prospects 2017—Volume I: Comprehensive Tables (pp ix–xvii). United Nations. https://doi.org/10.18356/9789210001014c003

84.

Van Avermaet

Pulinx

. (2014). Language testing for immigration to Europe. In Kunnan

(Ed.), The companion to language assessment (pp. 1–14). John Wiley & Sons.

85.

Vanbuel

Bugge

(2025, December 22). IMPECT. osf.io/dv75p

86.

Vanbuel

Deygers

(2024). Assessing receptive skills in an adult L2 learner population with diverse educational backgrounds. Language Assessment Quarterly, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2024.2438151

87.

van Oers

. (2014). Deserving citizenship. Brill. https://brill.com/display/title/24075

88.

Vogl

(2017). Cultural dissonance of elder learners in beginning literacy and language classrooms. (School of Education and Leadership Student Capstone Theses and Dissertations 4335). https://digitalcommons.hamline.edu/hse_all/433

89.

World Health Organisation (WHO). (2025, September 1). Refugee and migrant mental health. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/refugee-and-migrant-mental-health

How test-taker level of schooling interacts with pass probability on high-stakes tests for citizenship

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References