BalkinJ. (2010). Forward. In RizkN.ShaverL. (Eds.), Access to knowledge in Egypt (pp. xix–xxi). Bloomsbury Academic.
4.
EriksenT. M.BrevikL. M. (2023). Developing a “research literacy way of thinking” in initial teacher education: Students as co-researchers. In MenterI. (Ed.), The Palgrave handbook of teacher education research (pp. 231–256). Springer.
5.
GuzzoR. A.SchneiderB.NalbantianH. R. (2022). Open Science, closed doors: The perils and potential of Open Science for research in practice. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 15(4), 495–515. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2022.61
6.
IsbellD. R.KremmelB. (2024a). Open Science and the next generation of language testing research. Language Testing, 41(4), 898–908. https://doi.org/10.1177/02655322241264082
7.
IsbellD. RKremmelB. (2024b). Open Science practices in language assessment: Introducing the special issue. Language Testing, 41(4), 697–702. https://doi.org/10.1177/02655322241264092
8.
LiuM.Al-HoorieA. H.HiverP. V. (2024). Open access in language testing and assessment: The case of two flagship journals. Language Testing, 41(4), 703–728. https://doi.org/10.1177/02655322241261417
9.
MarsdenE.AlferinkI.AndringaS.BolibaughC.CollinsLJacksonC.KasprowiczR.O’ReillyD.PlonskyL. (2018). Open Accessible Summaries in Language Studies (OASIS) [Database]. https://www.oasis-database.org
10.
Ministry of Education and Technical Education. (n.d.). Egyptian Knowledge Bank. https://lms.ekb.eg/
11.
WinkeP. (2024). Sharing, collaborating, and building trust: How Open Science advances language testing. Language Testing, 41(4), 845–859. https://doi.org/10.1177/02655322231211159