ByrnesH.MaximH.NorrisJ. M. (2010). Realizing advanced FL writing development in collegiate education: Curricular design, pedagogy, assessment. Modern Language Journal, 94(s1), 1–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2010.01136.x
5.
DavisL.NorrisJ. M. (2021). Developing an innovative Elicited Imitation Task for efficient English proficiency assessment. TOEFL Research Report RR-96. Educational Testing Service. https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12338
6.
DeygersB. (2019). Fairness and social justice in English language assessment. In GaoX. (Ed.), Second handbook of English language teaching (pp. 541–569). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02899-2_30
7.
DeygersB.Van den BrandenK.Van GorpK. (2018). University entrance language tests: A matter of justice. Language Testing, 35(4), 449–476. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532217706196
8.
EastM. (2012). Task-based language teaching from the teachers’ perspective: Insights from New Zealand. John Benjamins Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.3
9.
FairbairnJ.SpibyR. (2019). Towards a framework of inclusion: Developing accessibility in tests at the British Council. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 34(2), 236–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2019.1581404
10.
FanJ.JinY. (2013). A survey of English language testing practice in China: The case of six examination boards. Language Testing in Asia, 3(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/2229-0443-3-7
11.
FoxJ.ArtemevaN. (2022). Reconsidering context in language assessment: Transdisciplinary perspectives, social theories, and validity. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351184571
Guzman-OrthD.LaitusisC.ThurlowM.ChristensenL. (2016). Conceptualizing accessibility for English language proficiency assessments. ETS Research Report Series, 2016(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12093
14.
Guzman-OrthD.SovaL.AlbeeT. (2020). Accessibility considerations for English learners with disabilities in English language proficiency assessments. In. Assessing English Language Proficiency in US K–12 schools (pp. 185–204), Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429491689-10
15.
HamidM. O.HardyI.ReyesV. (2019). Test-takers’ perspectives on a global test of English: Questions of fairness, justice and validity. Language Testing in Asia, 9(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-019-0092-9
16.
HardingL.BrunfautT.UngerJ. W. (2020). Language testing in the “hostile environment”: The discursive construction of “secure English language testing” in the UK. Applied Linguistics, 41(5), 662–687. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amz017
17.
KremmelB. (2017). Development and initial validation of a diagnostic computer-adaptive profiler of vocabulary knowledge [Unpublished PhD thesis]. University of Nottingham.
18.
MacGregorD.YenS. J.YuX. (2022). Using multistage testing to enhance measurement of an English language proficiency test. Language Assessment Quarterly, 19(1), 54–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2021.1988953
MorrisonK. M.EmbretsonS. (2018). Item generation. In The Wiley handbook of psychometric testing: A multidisciplinary reference on survey, scale and test development (pp. 75–94). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118489772.ch3
NorrisJ. M. (2009). Task-based teaching and testing. In LongM.DoughtyC. (Eds.), Handbook of language teaching (pp. 578–594). Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444315783.ch30
23.
NorrisJ. M.EastM. (2021). Task-based language assessment. In AhmadianM.LongM. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of task-based language teaching (pp. 505–528). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108868327.029
24.
NorrisJ. M.RaishM. (2017). Arabic language assessment. In WahbaK.EnglandL.TahaZ. (Eds.), Handbook for Arabic language teaching professionals in the 21st century (Vol. 2, pp. 255–268). Routledge.
25.
PapageorgiouS.DavisL.NorrisJ. M.Garcia GomezP.MannaV. F.MonfilsL. (2021). Design framework for the TOEFL Essentials test 2021. Research Memorandum No. RM-21-03). Educational Testing Service. https://www.ets.org/content/dam/ets-org/pdfs/toefl/RM-21-03.pdf
26.
ParkM. (2018). Innovative assessment of aviation English in a virtual world: Windows into cognitive and metacognitive strategies. Recall, 30(2), 196–213. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344017000362
27.
ParkM. (2020). Investigating target tasks, task phases, and indigenous criteria for military aviation English assessment. Language Assessment Quarterly, 17(4), 337–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2020.1799221
28.
PillJ.HardingL. (2013). Defining the language assessment literacy gap: Evidence from a parliamentary inquiry. Language Testing, 30(3), 381–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532213480337
29.
RafatbakhshE.AhmadiA.MoloodiA.MehrpourS. (2021). Development and validation of an automatic item generation system for English idioms. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 40(2), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12401
SchmittN.NationP.KremmelB. (2020). Moving the field of vocabulary assessment forward: The need for more rigorous test development and validation. Language Teaching, 53(1), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444819000326
32.
ShohamyE.MenkenK. (2015). Language assessment: Past to present misuses and future possibilities. In WrightW. E.BounS.GarcíaO. (Eds.), The Handbook of Bilingual and Multilingual Education. (pp. 253–269) https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118533406.ch15
33.
TaguchiN.KimY. (Eds.) (2018). Task-based approaches to teaching and assessing pragmatics. Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.10