Restricted accessIntroductionFirst published online 2021-10
Responsibilities and opportunities in language testing with respect to historicized forms of socio-political discrimination: A matter of academic citizenship
LeungC.MohanB. (2004). Teacher formative assessment and talk in classroom contexts: Assessment as discourse and assessment of discourse. Language Testing, 21(3), 335–359. https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532204lt287oa
MacqueenS.KnochU.WigglesworthG.NordlingerR.SingerR.McNamaraT.BrickleR. (2019). The impact of national standardized literacy and numeracy testing on children and teaching staff in remote Australian Indigenous communities. Language Testing, 36(2), 265–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532218775758
4.
Rea-DickinsP. (1997). So, why do we need relationships with stakeholders in language testing? A view from the UK. Language Testing, 14(3), 304–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229701400307
MacfarlaneB. (2007). Defining and rewarding academic citizenship: The implications for university promotions policy. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 29(3), 261–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600800701457863
15.
McNamaraT.RoeverC. (2006). Language testing: The social dimension. Blackwell.
RobinsonO. E.HennerJ. (2017). The personal is political in The Deaf Mute Howls: Deaf epistemology seeks disability justice. Disability and Society, 32(9), 1416–1436. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2017.1313723
21.
SchisselJ. L. (2019). Social consequences of testing for language-minoritized bilinguals in the United States. Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/SCHISS2708
22.
ShohamyE. G. (2001). The power of tests: A critical perspective on the uses of language tests. Pearson Education.