The Test of English for International Communication (TOEIC ® )

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

Booth D. K. (2012). Exploring the washback of the TOEIC in South Korea: A sociocultural perspective on student test activity. Unpublished doctoral thesis, The University of Auckland, New Zealand.

Chapman M. Newfields T. (2008). The ‘new’ TOEIC. Shiken: JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter, 12, 32–37. Retrieved from www.tnewfields.info/Articles/PDF/newTOEIC.pdf.

Choi I.-C. (2008). The impact of EFL testing on EFL education in Korea. Language Testing, 25, 39–62.

Cohen J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Educational Testing Service. (2010). User guide – Speaking & writing. Retrieved from www.ets.org/s/toeic/pdf/toeic_sw_score_user_guide.pdf.

Educational Testing Service. (2013). User guide – Listening and reading. Retrieved from www.ets.org/Media/Tests/Test_of_English_for_International_Communication/TOEIC_User_Gd.pdf.

Educational Testing Service. (2015a). Examinee handbook – Listening & reading. Retrieved from www.ets.org/Media/Tests/TOEIC/pdf/TOEIC_LR_examinee_handbook.pdf.

Educational Testing Service. (2015b). Sample questions of reading comprehension. Retrieved from http://exam.ybmnet.co.kr/toeic/info/sample_rc5.asp.

Educational Testing Service. (2015c, November 5). Sinthoik, 2016nyen 5wuel 29il siayng [Released an updated version of the TOEIC on May 29, 2016]. Retrieved from www.toeicstory.co.kr/102.

Educational Testing Service. (2016a). Examinee handbook– Speaking & writing. Retrieved from www.ets.org/Media/Tests/TOEIC/pdf/TOEIC_Speaking_and_Writing_Examinee_Handbook.pdf.

Education Testing Service (2016b). Examinee handbook– Listening & reading. Retrieved from www.etsglobal.org/content/download/15388/261514/version/5/file/TOEIC+LR+and+SW+Examinee+Handbooks.pdf.

Educational Testing Service. (2016c). The TOEIC^® tests – The global standard for assessing English proficiency for business. Retrieved from www.ets.org/toeic/succeed.

Educational Testing Service. (2017). Examinee handbook – For the updated version of the TOEIC^® listening and reading test. Retrieved from www.ets.org/s/toeic/pdf/examinee-handbook-for-toeic-listening-reading-test-updated.pdf.

Educational Testing Service. (n.d.). The purpose, structure and utility of an assessment use argument (AUA). Retrieved from www.ets.org/toeic/research/theory/.

Elder C. Harding L. (2008). Language testing and English as an international language: Constraint and contributions. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 34.1–34.11.

Everson P. Hines S. (2010). TOEIC^® speaking and writing test responses (TOEIC Compendium TC-10-08). Retrieved from www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/TC-10-08.pdf.

Hines S. (2010). Evidence-centered design: The TOEIC speaking and writing test (TOEIC Compendium TC-10-07). Retrieved from www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/TC-10-07.pdf.

Hsieh C.-N. (2017). The case of Taiwan: Perceptions of college students about the use of the TOEIC^® tests as a condition of graduation (Research Report No. RR-17-45). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12179.

Im G.-H. McNamara T. (2017). Legitimate or illegitimate uses of test scores in contexts unrelated to test purposes. English Teaching, 72, 71–99. doi: 10.15858/engtea.72.2.201706.71

Institute for International Business Communication. (2014). TOEIC program data & analysis 2014. Retrieved from www.toeic.or.jp/library/toeic_data/toeic_en/pdf/data/TOEIC_Program_DAA.pdf.

Jung H. (2010). Kaycengtwoyn thoiki hankwuktayhaksayngtuluy yengekyoswu∙haksupey michinun yeklywuhyokwa [Washback effects of new TOEIC on Korean college students’ English teaching and learning]. English21, 23, 183–207.

Kane M. T. (2013). Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores. Journal of Educational Measurement, 50, 1–73.

Kankaanranta A. Louhiala-Salminen L. (2013). What language does global business speak? – The concept and development of BELF, Ibérica, 26, 17–34.

Korea TOEIC Council (2013, April). Yenge malhaki sihemuy kullobel kicwun TOEIC speaking [Global standard of English speaking test: the TOEIC speaking]. TOEIC newsletter, 75. Retrieved from http://upsisa.ybmsisa.com/si/exam_ybmsisa_com/newsletter/pdffile/75.pdf.

Liao C.-w. Hatrak N Yu F. (2010). Comparison of content, item statistics and test-taker performance for the redesigned and classic TOEIC listening and reading tests (TOEIC Compendium TC-10-04). Retrieved from www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/TC-10-04.pdf.

Liao C.-w. Qu Y. (2010). Alternate forms test–retest reliability and test score changes for the TOEIC^® speaking and writing tests (TOEIC Compendium TC-10-10). Retrieved from www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/TC-10-10.pdf.

Liao C.-w. Wei Y. (2010). Statistical analyses for the TOEIC^® speaking and writing pilot study (TOEIC Compendium TC-10-09). Retrieved from www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/TC-10-09.pdf.

Liu J. Costanzo K. (2013). The relationship among TOEIC listening, reading, speaking, and writing skills. In Powers D. E. (Ed.), The research foundation for the TOEIC tests: A compendium of studies (Vol. II, pp. 2.1–2.25). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Louhiala-Salminen L. Charles M. Kankaanranta A. (2005). English as a lingua franca in Nordic corporate mergers: Two case companies. English for Specific Purpose, 24, 401–421. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2005.02.003.

Louhiala-Salminen L. Kankaanranta A. (2011). Professional communication in a global business context: The notion of global communicative competence. IEEE Transactions of Professional Communication, 54, 244–262.

Mislevy R. J. Steinberg L. S. Almond R. G. (2002). Design and analysis in task-based language assessment. Language Testing, 19, 477–496.

Mislevy R. J. Steinberg L. S. Almond R. G. (2003). On the structure of assessment arguments. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 1, 3–62.

Newfields T. (2005). TOEIC^® washback effects on teachers: A pilot study at one university faculty. Toyo University Keizai Ronshu, 31, 83–106.

Newton P. E. (2010). The multiple purposes of assessment. In Peterson P. Baker E. McGaw B. (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (3rd ed.) (pp. 392–396). doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00355-9.

Powers D. E. Kim H.-J. Weng V. X. (2010). The redesigned TOEIC^® (listening and reading) test: Relations to test-taker perceptions of proficiency in English (TOEIC Compendium TC-10-06). Retrieved from www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/TC-10-06.pdf.

Powers D. E. Kim H.-J. Yu F. Weng V. Z. VanWinkle W. (2010). The TOEIC^® speaking and writing tests: Relations to test-takers perceptions of proficiency in English (TOEIC Compendium TC-10-11). Retrieved from www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/TC-10-11.pdf.

Powers D. E. Powers A. (2015). The incremental contribution of TOEIC^® listening, reading, speaking, and writing tests to predicting performance on real-life English language tasks. Language Testing, 32, 151–167.

Qu Y. Ricker-Pedley K. L. (2013). Monitoring individual rater performance for the TOEIC speaking and writing tests. In Powers D. E. (Ed.), The research foundation for the TOEIC tests: A compendium of studies (Vol. II, pp. 9.1–9.9). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Toulmin S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Toulmin S. (2003). The uses of argument (Updated ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Yoo H. Manna V. F. (2017). Measuring English language workplace proficiency across subgroups: Using CFA models to validate test score interpretation. Language Testing, 34, 101–126. doi: 10.1177/0265532215618987.