Diagnostic English Language Needs Assessment (DELNA)

Alderson J. C. (2000). Assessing reading. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Alderson J. C. (2005). Diagnosing foreign language proficiency: The interface between learning and assessment. London: Continuum.

Black P. William D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1): 7–71.

Chapelle C. A. Enright M. A. Jamieson J. M. (2007). Building a validity argument for the test of English as a foreign language. New York: Routledge.

Davies A. (1975). Two tests of speeded reading. In Jones R. L. Spolsky B. (Eds.), Testing language proficiency. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.

Davies A. Elder C. (2005). Validity and validation in language testing. In Hinkel E. (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 795–813). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Dunworth K. (2009). An investigation into post-entry English language assessment in Australian universities. Journal of Academic Language & Learning, 3: A1–A13.

Elder C. Erlam R. (2001). Development and validation of the Diagnostic English Language Needs Assessment (DELNA). Auckland: University of Auckland.

Elder C. von Randow J. (2002). Report on the 2002 pilot of DELNA at the University of Auckland. Auckland, New Zealand: University of Auckland.

Elder C. von Randow J. (2008). Exploring the utility of a web-based English language screening tool. Language Assessment Quarterly, 5(3): 173–194.

Haladyna T. M. Downing S. M. (2004). Construct-irrelevant variance in high-stakes testing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 23(1): 17–24.

Hill K. McNamara T. (2012). Developing a comprehensive, empirically based research framework for classroom-based assessment. Language Testing, 29(3): 395–420.

Jang E. E. (2008). A framework for cognitive diagnostic assessment. In Chapelle C. A. Chung Y. R. Xu I. (Eds.), Towards adaptive CALL: Natural language processing for diagnostic language assessment (pp. 117–131). Paper presented at Fifth Annual Conference on Technology for Second Language Learning, University of Iowa.

Jang E. E. (2009). Cognitive diagnostic assessment of L2 reading comprehension ability: Validity arguments for fusion model application to LanguEdge assessment. Language Testing, 26(1): 31–73.

Knoch U. (2009). Diagnostic assessment of writing: A comparison of two rating scales. Language Testing, 26(2): 275–304.

Knoch U. Read J. von Randow J. (2007). Re-training writing raters online: How does it compare with face-to-face training? Assessing Writing, 12: 26–43.

Manning W. H. (1987). Development of cloze-elide tests of English as a second language (TOEFL Research Rep. No. RR-87–18). Princeton, NJ: ETS.

McNamara T. Roever C. (2006). Language testing: The social dimension. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Murray N. (2010). Considerations in the post-enrolment assessment of English language proficiency: Reflections from the Australian context. Language Assessment Quarterly, 7(4): 343–358.

Read J. (2008). Identifying language needs through diagnostic assessment. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(3): 180–190.

Read J. (2013). Issues in post-entry language assessment in English-medium universities. Language Teaching, Firstview article, 1–8.

Read J. von Randow J. (2013). A university post-entry English language assessment: Charting the changes. International Journal of English Studies, 13(2): 89–110.

Rea-Dickins P. (2008). Classroom-based language assessment. In Shohamy E. Hornberger N. H. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Language and Education (2nd ed., pp. 257–271). New York: Springer Science.

Shohamy E. (2001). Democratic assessment as an alternative. Language Testing, 18(4): 373–391.

UniversityofAuckland. (n.d). DELNA for students. Retrieved from www.delna.auckland.ac.nz/en/delna-for-students.html

University of Auckland. (2010). Annual Report 2010: DELNA. Auckland, NZ: University of Auckland.

University of Auckland. (2006). Annual Report 2006: DELNA. Auckland, NZ: University of Auckland.

Xue G. Nation I. S. P. (1984). A university word list. Language Learning and Communication, 3(2): 215–229.